Zhenrong Yang , Jingfu Ye , Shiliang Qu , Jinjian Li , Weijiang Xu
{"title":"不同目标下可编程多模干涉仪平台的反设计性能差异","authors":"Zhenrong Yang , Jingfu Ye , Shiliang Qu , Jinjian Li , Weijiang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, researchers have proposed a kind of programmable multimode interferometer (MMI) platform. By leveraging the inverse design, this kind of compact device is very promising for next generation of silicon-based photonic processors. However, the design capabilities of the programmable MMI have not yet been investigated. On the other hand, the optical performance of the inverse-designed device is usually determined by both the optimization algorithm and the platform itself, and one may wonder how much the algorithm or the platform affects the design results. In this paper, we distinguish between algorithm optimization capability and platform capability by introducing the random structure targets and the random function targets. The results show that for optical field amplitude targets, the device performance in inverse design is excellent, largely due to the algorithm's optimization, which has a more significant impact. However, for transmission matrix targets, the MMI platform itself becomes the primary limiting factor. This work provides a unique way to investigate the design capabilities of the programmable MMI, and, to some extent, also provides guidance for the further development of the programmable MMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19586,"journal":{"name":"Optics Communications","volume":"586 ","pages":"Article 131906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance differences of programmable multimode interferometer platform for different targets in inverse design\",\"authors\":\"Zhenrong Yang , Jingfu Ye , Shiliang Qu , Jinjian Li , Weijiang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recently, researchers have proposed a kind of programmable multimode interferometer (MMI) platform. By leveraging the inverse design, this kind of compact device is very promising for next generation of silicon-based photonic processors. However, the design capabilities of the programmable MMI have not yet been investigated. On the other hand, the optical performance of the inverse-designed device is usually determined by both the optimization algorithm and the platform itself, and one may wonder how much the algorithm or the platform affects the design results. In this paper, we distinguish between algorithm optimization capability and platform capability by introducing the random structure targets and the random function targets. The results show that for optical field amplitude targets, the device performance in inverse design is excellent, largely due to the algorithm's optimization, which has a more significant impact. However, for transmission matrix targets, the MMI platform itself becomes the primary limiting factor. This work provides a unique way to investigate the design capabilities of the programmable MMI, and, to some extent, also provides guidance for the further development of the programmable MMI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optics Communications\",\"volume\":\"586 \",\"pages\":\"Article 131906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optics Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401825004341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401825004341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance differences of programmable multimode interferometer platform for different targets in inverse design
Recently, researchers have proposed a kind of programmable multimode interferometer (MMI) platform. By leveraging the inverse design, this kind of compact device is very promising for next generation of silicon-based photonic processors. However, the design capabilities of the programmable MMI have not yet been investigated. On the other hand, the optical performance of the inverse-designed device is usually determined by both the optimization algorithm and the platform itself, and one may wonder how much the algorithm or the platform affects the design results. In this paper, we distinguish between algorithm optimization capability and platform capability by introducing the random structure targets and the random function targets. The results show that for optical field amplitude targets, the device performance in inverse design is excellent, largely due to the algorithm's optimization, which has a more significant impact. However, for transmission matrix targets, the MMI platform itself becomes the primary limiting factor. This work provides a unique way to investigate the design capabilities of the programmable MMI, and, to some extent, also provides guidance for the further development of the programmable MMI.
期刊介绍:
Optics Communications invites original and timely contributions containing new results in various fields of optics and photonics. The journal considers theoretical and experimental research in areas ranging from the fundamental properties of light to technological applications. Topics covered include classical and quantum optics, optical physics and light-matter interactions, lasers, imaging, guided-wave optics and optical information processing. Manuscripts should offer clear evidence of novelty and significance. Papers concentrating on mathematical and computational issues, with limited connection to optics, are not suitable for publication in the Journal. Similarly, small technical advances, or papers concerned only with engineering applications or issues of materials science fall outside the journal scope.