{"title":"在生命周期模型中通过碳捕获和利用评估蓝氨对气候变化的影响","authors":"Mutaz Chahrour, Christina Wulf, Petra Zapp","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ammonia production represents a fundamental aspect of the global chemical industry. It is a significant contributor to carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, and it is necessary that innovative methods be developed to reduce its climate impact. This study assesses the environmental impact of blue ammonia production incorporating carbon capture and utilization (CCU) through a novel Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, based on the latest guidelines from the Together for Sustainability (TfS) initiative. This analysis is centred on three systems: grey ammonia (System A), blue ammonia with in-process carbon capture (System B), and blue ammonia utilizing system expansion via direct air capture (DAC) (System C). The results demonstrate that the production of grey ammonia in Germany generates 3.12 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> per kg of ammonia, predominantly due to emissions from steam methane reforming (SMR). The incorporation of in-process CO<sub>2</sub> capture in blue ammonia (System B) results in a climate impact of 1.79 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> for the functional unit of 1 kg ammonia plus 1.85 kg of succesfully captured CO<sub>2</sub>. The implementation of system expansion via DAC (System C), as recommended by the TfS guidelines, results in a further reduction of ammonia emissions to 2.64 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>, in comparison to System A. This approach also yields a net negative impact of −0.85 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> for the captured CO<sub>2</sub> co-product, enabling the realization of the shared incentivization objective articulated in the suggested guideline. The regional scenarios convincingly demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves varying levels of success, often leading to more polarized incentivization. The future scenario will significantly enhance the benefits of CCU and the utilization of CO<sub>2</sub> as a co-product. However, this will be at the expense of incentivizing the production of blue ammonia. This work advances the methodologies for LCA of multi-functional CCU systems, demonstrating the potential for shared incentives in the transition to a new ammonia generation system as a prime example. Nonetheless, it also highlights limitations in regions where the energy source is dominated by fossil fuels or where the energy source is fully renewable. The current TfS framework methodology proposition is therefore a short-term solution to promote the sustainable production of blue ammonia with CCU applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 125438"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing climate change impact of blue ammonia via carbon capture and utilization in life cycle modelling\",\"authors\":\"Mutaz Chahrour, Christina Wulf, Petra Zapp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ammonia production represents a fundamental aspect of the global chemical industry. It is a significant contributor to carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, and it is necessary that innovative methods be developed to reduce its climate impact. This study assesses the environmental impact of blue ammonia production incorporating carbon capture and utilization (CCU) through a novel Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, based on the latest guidelines from the Together for Sustainability (TfS) initiative. This analysis is centred on three systems: grey ammonia (System A), blue ammonia with in-process carbon capture (System B), and blue ammonia utilizing system expansion via direct air capture (DAC) (System C). The results demonstrate that the production of grey ammonia in Germany generates 3.12 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> per kg of ammonia, predominantly due to emissions from steam methane reforming (SMR). The incorporation of in-process CO<sub>2</sub> capture in blue ammonia (System B) results in a climate impact of 1.79 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> for the functional unit of 1 kg ammonia plus 1.85 kg of succesfully captured CO<sub>2</sub>. The implementation of system expansion via DAC (System C), as recommended by the TfS guidelines, results in a further reduction of ammonia emissions to 2.64 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>, in comparison to System A. This approach also yields a net negative impact of −0.85 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> for the captured CO<sub>2</sub> co-product, enabling the realization of the shared incentivization objective articulated in the suggested guideline. The regional scenarios convincingly demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves varying levels of success, often leading to more polarized incentivization. The future scenario will significantly enhance the benefits of CCU and the utilization of CO<sub>2</sub> as a co-product. However, this will be at the expense of incentivizing the production of blue ammonia. This work advances the methodologies for LCA of multi-functional CCU systems, demonstrating the potential for shared incentives in the transition to a new ammonia generation system as a prime example. Nonetheless, it also highlights limitations in regions where the energy source is dominated by fossil fuels or where the energy source is fully renewable. The current TfS framework methodology proposition is therefore a short-term solution to promote the sustainable production of blue ammonia with CCU applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"383 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725014148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725014148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
氨生产是全球化学工业的一个基本方面。它是二氧化碳(CO2)排放的重要来源,因此有必要开发创新方法来减少其对气候的影响。本研究以 "携手实现可持续发展"(TfS)倡议的最新指导方针为基础,通过新颖的生命周期评估(LCA)方法,评估了结合碳捕集与利用(CCU)的蓝色氨生产对环境的影响。该分析以三个系统为中心:灰氨(系统 A)、带过程中碳捕集的蓝氨(系统 B)和通过直接空气捕集(DAC)进行系统扩展的蓝氨(系统 C)。结果表明,在德国生产灰氨每千克氨产生 3.12 千克二氧化碳当量,主要是由于蒸汽甲烷转化(SMR)产生的排放。在蓝色氨水(系统 B)中加入过程中二氧化碳捕集,以 1 千克氨水加 1.85 千克成功捕集的二氧化碳为功能单位,对气候的影响为 1.79 千克 CO2eq。根据 TfS 指南的建议,通过 DAC(系统 C)实施系统扩展,与系统 A 相比,氨的排放量进一步减少至 2.64 kgCO2eq。这种方法还产生了捕获的二氧化碳副产品-0.85 kgCO2eq 的净负面影响,实现了建议指南中阐述的共同激励目标。区域方案令人信服地表明,建议的方法取得了不同程度的成功,往往导致激励措施更加两极分化。未来方案将显著提高 CCU 的效益和二氧化碳作为副产品的利用率。然而,这将以激励蓝氨生产为代价。这项工作推进了多功能 CCU 系统的生命周期评估方法,并以过渡到新型合成氨生产系统为例,展示了共享激励措施的潜力。尽管如此,它也凸显了在能源以化石燃料为主或能源完全可再生的地区的局限性。因此,目前的 TfS 框架方法建议是促进利用 CCU 应用可持续生产蓝色氨的短期解决方案。
Assessing climate change impact of blue ammonia via carbon capture and utilization in life cycle modelling
Ammonia production represents a fundamental aspect of the global chemical industry. It is a significant contributor to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and it is necessary that innovative methods be developed to reduce its climate impact. This study assesses the environmental impact of blue ammonia production incorporating carbon capture and utilization (CCU) through a novel Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, based on the latest guidelines from the Together for Sustainability (TfS) initiative. This analysis is centred on three systems: grey ammonia (System A), blue ammonia with in-process carbon capture (System B), and blue ammonia utilizing system expansion via direct air capture (DAC) (System C). The results demonstrate that the production of grey ammonia in Germany generates 3.12 kgCO2eq per kg of ammonia, predominantly due to emissions from steam methane reforming (SMR). The incorporation of in-process CO2 capture in blue ammonia (System B) results in a climate impact of 1.79 kgCO2eq for the functional unit of 1 kg ammonia plus 1.85 kg of succesfully captured CO2. The implementation of system expansion via DAC (System C), as recommended by the TfS guidelines, results in a further reduction of ammonia emissions to 2.64 kgCO2eq, in comparison to System A. This approach also yields a net negative impact of −0.85 kgCO2eq for the captured CO2 co-product, enabling the realization of the shared incentivization objective articulated in the suggested guideline. The regional scenarios convincingly demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves varying levels of success, often leading to more polarized incentivization. The future scenario will significantly enhance the benefits of CCU and the utilization of CO2 as a co-product. However, this will be at the expense of incentivizing the production of blue ammonia. This work advances the methodologies for LCA of multi-functional CCU systems, demonstrating the potential for shared incentives in the transition to a new ammonia generation system as a prime example. Nonetheless, it also highlights limitations in regions where the energy source is dominated by fossil fuels or where the energy source is fully renewable. The current TfS framework methodology proposition is therefore a short-term solution to promote the sustainable production of blue ammonia with CCU applications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.