整合地热发电厂、水处理厂、AWE 和 PEM 电解槽,实现绿色制氢:技术经济研究

Muhammad Alwi Husaini , Prihadi Setyo Darmanto , Firman Bagja Juangsa
{"title":"整合地热发电厂、水处理厂、AWE 和 PEM 电解槽,实现绿色制氢:技术经济研究","authors":"Muhammad Alwi Husaini ,&nbsp;Prihadi Setyo Darmanto ,&nbsp;Firman Bagja Juangsa","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen production plays a crucial role in the global shift toward sustainable energy, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, large-scale adoption is often limited by high production costs and the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Geothermal energy offers a promising solution by providing a stable and continuous power supply for water electrolysis. This study explores the integration of geothermal power with water treatment and electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. Cooling tower basin water from a geothermal power plant is treated using an ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis-ion exchange mixed bed system to meet the purity requirements for electrolysis. The treated water achieves a conductivity of 1–2 μS/cm for alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and 0.05–0.08 μS/cm for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. A 10 MW AWE and PEM electrolyzer are modeled to produce 181.03 kg/h and 191.26 kg/h of hydrogen, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen is estimated at 6.52 $/kg for AWE and 6.67 $/kg for PEM, with electricity costs contributing over 64% of the total. AWE electrolysis at 10 MW requires 1616 kg/h of feed water, while PEM electrolysis requires 1709 kg/h, both supplied by the water treatment plant. Despite higher capital costs and shorter lifespans of PEM electrolyzers, water treatment costs remain minimal at 0.17% of total production costs. The findings demonstrate geothermal energy as a viable alternative to intermittent renewables for continuous hydrogen production. This study offers a techno-economic evaluation of geothermal-based hydrogen production, supporting its role in the global energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of geothermal power plant, water treatment plant, AWE, and PEM electrolyzer for green hydrogen production: A techno-economic study\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Alwi Husaini ,&nbsp;Prihadi Setyo Darmanto ,&nbsp;Firman Bagja Juangsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green hydrogen production plays a crucial role in the global shift toward sustainable energy, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, large-scale adoption is often limited by high production costs and the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Geothermal energy offers a promising solution by providing a stable and continuous power supply for water electrolysis. This study explores the integration of geothermal power with water treatment and electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. Cooling tower basin water from a geothermal power plant is treated using an ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis-ion exchange mixed bed system to meet the purity requirements for electrolysis. The treated water achieves a conductivity of 1–2 μS/cm for alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and 0.05–0.08 μS/cm for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. A 10 MW AWE and PEM electrolyzer are modeled to produce 181.03 kg/h and 191.26 kg/h of hydrogen, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen is estimated at 6.52 $/kg for AWE and 6.67 $/kg for PEM, with electricity costs contributing over 64% of the total. AWE electrolysis at 10 MW requires 1616 kg/h of feed water, while PEM electrolysis requires 1709 kg/h, both supplied by the water treatment plant. Despite higher capital costs and shorter lifespans of PEM electrolyzers, water treatment costs remain minimal at 0.17% of total production costs. The findings demonstrate geothermal energy as a viable alternative to intermittent renewables for continuous hydrogen production. This study offers a techno-economic evaluation of geothermal-based hydrogen production, supporting its role in the global energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Next Energy\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Next Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25000511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of geothermal power plant, water treatment plant, AWE, and PEM electrolyzer for green hydrogen production: A techno-economic study
Green hydrogen production plays a crucial role in the global shift toward sustainable energy, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, large-scale adoption is often limited by high production costs and the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Geothermal energy offers a promising solution by providing a stable and continuous power supply for water electrolysis. This study explores the integration of geothermal power with water treatment and electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. Cooling tower basin water from a geothermal power plant is treated using an ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis-ion exchange mixed bed system to meet the purity requirements for electrolysis. The treated water achieves a conductivity of 1–2 μS/cm for alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and 0.05–0.08 μS/cm for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. A 10 MW AWE and PEM electrolyzer are modeled to produce 181.03 kg/h and 191.26 kg/h of hydrogen, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen is estimated at 6.52 $/kg for AWE and 6.67 $/kg for PEM, with electricity costs contributing over 64% of the total. AWE electrolysis at 10 MW requires 1616 kg/h of feed water, while PEM electrolysis requires 1709 kg/h, both supplied by the water treatment plant. Despite higher capital costs and shorter lifespans of PEM electrolyzers, water treatment costs remain minimal at 0.17% of total production costs. The findings demonstrate geothermal energy as a viable alternative to intermittent renewables for continuous hydrogen production. This study offers a techno-economic evaluation of geothermal-based hydrogen production, supporting its role in the global energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信