PMA-qPCR定量消毒剂处理后多物种口腔生物膜活菌

IF 5.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Sybille Schwendener, Manuela Flury, Joël Jenzer, Thomas Thurnheer, Lamprini Karygianni
{"title":"PMA-qPCR定量消毒剂处理后多物种口腔生物膜活菌","authors":"Sybille Schwendener,&nbsp;Manuela Flury,&nbsp;Joël Jenzer,&nbsp;Thomas Thurnheer,&nbsp;Lamprini Karygianni","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) amplifies DNA from viable and dead cells, which can lead to an overestimation of live bacteria. Viability qPCR aims to eliminate DNA from membrane-compromised cells through treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA).</div><div>Here, we evaluated PMA-qPCR to enumerate viable cells of <em>Actinomyces oris</em>, <em>Fusobacterium nucleatum</em>, <em>Streptococcus oralis</em>, <em>Streptococcus mutans,</em> and <em>Veillonella dispar</em>. Five-species oral biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 h. The biofilms were exposed to 0.2 % chlorhexidine (CHX) or 3 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 2 min, either once before cell harvest at 64 h or six times during biofilm growth. The total and single species cells were quantified by culture (CFU) and qPCR from samples with and without PMA treatment before DNA extraction. For species-specific qPCR, TaqMan assays were applied. To determine total bacteria counts, a SYBR green qPCR was established using universal degenerative primers for the conserved <em>dnaK</em> gene.</div><div>For biofilms treated once with CHX, the addition of PMA led to a 1 to 1.6 log<sub>10</sub> reduction in PCR counts. This closely matched CFU and PMA-qPCR counts for total bacteria and all single species, except for <em>F. nucleatum</em>, where PMA-qPCR detected significantly more bacteria than culture. NaOCl treatment directly affected DNA and inhibited subsequent PCR amplification, even in samples without PMA. Single treatment of biofilms with 3 % NaOCl and six-fold exposure of biofilms to disinfectants resulted in no viable cell detection by culture. However, PMA did not completely prevent PCR amplification, indicating that disinfectant efficacy measured by viability PCR could be underestimated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PMA-qPCR to quantify viable cells in multispecies oral biofilm after disinfectant treatments\",\"authors\":\"Sybille Schwendener,&nbsp;Manuela Flury,&nbsp;Joël Jenzer,&nbsp;Thomas Thurnheer,&nbsp;Lamprini Karygianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conventional quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) amplifies DNA from viable and dead cells, which can lead to an overestimation of live bacteria. Viability qPCR aims to eliminate DNA from membrane-compromised cells through treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA).</div><div>Here, we evaluated PMA-qPCR to enumerate viable cells of <em>Actinomyces oris</em>, <em>Fusobacterium nucleatum</em>, <em>Streptococcus oralis</em>, <em>Streptococcus mutans,</em> and <em>Veillonella dispar</em>. Five-species oral biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 h. The biofilms were exposed to 0.2 % chlorhexidine (CHX) or 3 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 2 min, either once before cell harvest at 64 h or six times during biofilm growth. The total and single species cells were quantified by culture (CFU) and qPCR from samples with and without PMA treatment before DNA extraction. For species-specific qPCR, TaqMan assays were applied. To determine total bacteria counts, a SYBR green qPCR was established using universal degenerative primers for the conserved <em>dnaK</em> gene.</div><div>For biofilms treated once with CHX, the addition of PMA led to a 1 to 1.6 log<sub>10</sub> reduction in PCR counts. This closely matched CFU and PMA-qPCR counts for total bacteria and all single species, except for <em>F. nucleatum</em>, where PMA-qPCR detected significantly more bacteria than culture. NaOCl treatment directly affected DNA and inhibited subsequent PCR amplification, even in samples without PMA. Single treatment of biofilms with 3 % NaOCl and six-fold exposure of biofilms to disinfectants resulted in no viable cell detection by culture. However, PMA did not completely prevent PCR amplification, indicating that disinfectant efficacy measured by viability PCR could be underestimated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biofilm\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biofilm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的实时定量PCR (qPCR)扩增来自活细胞和死细胞的DNA,这可能导致对活细菌的高估。活力qPCR旨在通过单叠氮丙啶(PMA)处理消除膜受损细胞的DNA。本研究采用PMA-qPCR技术对口放线菌、核梭菌、口腔链球菌、变形链球菌和异细孔菌进行活菌计数。五种口腔生物膜在羟基磷灰石盘上培养64小时。将生物膜暴露于0.2%氯己定(CHX)或3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)中2分钟,在64小时收获细胞前1次或在生物膜生长过程中6次。提取DNA前,分别用培养(CFU)和qPCR对加PMA和不加PMA的样品进行总细胞和单种细胞的定量。对于物种特异性qPCR,采用TaqMan法。为了确定细菌总数,使用通用退行性引物建立了SYBR绿色qPCR,用于保守的dnaK基因。对于用CHX处理过一次的生物膜,添加PMA导致PCR计数减少1至1.6 log10。这与CFU和PMA-qPCR对总细菌和所有单一物种的计数密切匹配,除了具核梭菌,其中PMA-qPCR检测到的细菌明显多于培养。NaOCl处理直接影响DNA并抑制随后的PCR扩增,即使在没有PMA的样品中也是如此。用3% NaOCl对生物膜进行单次处理,并用消毒剂对生物膜进行6次处理,结果没有发现培养的活细胞。然而,PMA并不能完全阻止PCR扩增,表明用活力PCR测定的消毒效果可能被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PMA-qPCR to quantify viable cells in multispecies oral biofilm after disinfectant treatments
Conventional quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) amplifies DNA from viable and dead cells, which can lead to an overestimation of live bacteria. Viability qPCR aims to eliminate DNA from membrane-compromised cells through treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA).
Here, we evaluated PMA-qPCR to enumerate viable cells of Actinomyces oris, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mutans, and Veillonella dispar. Five-species oral biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 h. The biofilms were exposed to 0.2 % chlorhexidine (CHX) or 3 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 2 min, either once before cell harvest at 64 h or six times during biofilm growth. The total and single species cells were quantified by culture (CFU) and qPCR from samples with and without PMA treatment before DNA extraction. For species-specific qPCR, TaqMan assays were applied. To determine total bacteria counts, a SYBR green qPCR was established using universal degenerative primers for the conserved dnaK gene.
For biofilms treated once with CHX, the addition of PMA led to a 1 to 1.6 log10 reduction in PCR counts. This closely matched CFU and PMA-qPCR counts for total bacteria and all single species, except for F. nucleatum, where PMA-qPCR detected significantly more bacteria than culture. NaOCl treatment directly affected DNA and inhibited subsequent PCR amplification, even in samples without PMA. Single treatment of biofilms with 3 % NaOCl and six-fold exposure of biofilms to disinfectants resulted in no viable cell detection by culture. However, PMA did not completely prevent PCR amplification, indicating that disinfectant efficacy measured by viability PCR could be underestimated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信