{"title":"行政垄断规制与债务融资成本:来自中国的证据","authors":"Shuxun Cai , Xiaoran Ni","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102777"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Shuxun Cai , Xiaoran Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China
Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊介绍:
The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.