使用3D技术保护和延续土著遗产的伦理考虑

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Medeia Csoba DeHass, Lori Collins, Alexandra Taitt, Julie Raymond-Yakoubian, Travis Doering, Lisa Navraq Ellanna, Eric Hollinger, Jorge Gonzalez, Edwell John Jr., Desireé Martinez, Meghan Sigvanna Tapqaq
{"title":"使用3D技术保护和延续土著遗产的伦理考虑","authors":"Medeia Csoba DeHass, Lori Collins, Alexandra Taitt, Julie Raymond-Yakoubian, Travis Doering, Lisa Navraq Ellanna, Eric Hollinger, Jorge Gonzalez, Edwell John Jr., Desireé Martinez, Meghan Sigvanna Tapqaq","doi":"10.1017/aaq.2024.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The past decade saw the proliferation of projects that use 3D and related technologies to engage with Indigenous heritage through museum collections and cultural heritage site digitization projects involving the documentation and sometimes physical replication of objects and landscapes; some of these projects involved Indigenous origin communities. Although 3D technologies have become more widespread and accessible, ethical considerations in practice lag behind. The “Ethical Considerations in Three-Dimensional Digitization of Indigenous Heritage” project unites researchers, members of Indigenous communities, and 3D heritage specialists to develop a set of best practices for the responsible conduct of research (RCR). These practices promote ethical cultures in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, recognizing Indigenous heritage 3D modeling as a critical part of the broader conversation around decolonization and core methodologies. This article proposes incorporating best practices developed from the RCR findings for 3D digitization projects of Indigenous cultural heritage. We suggest utilizing <span>C</span>ollective benefit, <span>A</span>uthority to control, <span>R</span>esponsibility, and <span>E</span>thics (CARE) principles, Indigenous Data Sovereignty, and a co-production of knowledge (CPK) framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":7424,"journal":{"name":"American Antiquity","volume":"260 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Considerations in the Use of 3D Technologies to Preserve and Perpetuate Indigenous Heritage\",\"authors\":\"Medeia Csoba DeHass, Lori Collins, Alexandra Taitt, Julie Raymond-Yakoubian, Travis Doering, Lisa Navraq Ellanna, Eric Hollinger, Jorge Gonzalez, Edwell John Jr., Desireé Martinez, Meghan Sigvanna Tapqaq\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aaq.2024.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The past decade saw the proliferation of projects that use 3D and related technologies to engage with Indigenous heritage through museum collections and cultural heritage site digitization projects involving the documentation and sometimes physical replication of objects and landscapes; some of these projects involved Indigenous origin communities. Although 3D technologies have become more widespread and accessible, ethical considerations in practice lag behind. The “Ethical Considerations in Three-Dimensional Digitization of Indigenous Heritage” project unites researchers, members of Indigenous communities, and 3D heritage specialists to develop a set of best practices for the responsible conduct of research (RCR). These practices promote ethical cultures in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, recognizing Indigenous heritage 3D modeling as a critical part of the broader conversation around decolonization and core methodologies. This article proposes incorporating best practices developed from the RCR findings for 3D digitization projects of Indigenous cultural heritage. We suggest utilizing <span>C</span>ollective benefit, <span>A</span>uthority to control, <span>R</span>esponsibility, and <span>E</span>thics (CARE) principles, Indigenous Data Sovereignty, and a co-production of knowledge (CPK) framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Antiquity\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Antiquity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2024.82\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2024.82","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,通过博物馆收藏和文化遗产数字化项目,使用3D和相关技术与土著遗产接触的项目激增,这些项目涉及物体和景观的文件记录,有时还包括实物复制;其中一些项目涉及土著社区。虽然3D技术已经变得更加广泛和容易获得,但实践中的道德考虑滞后。“土著遗产三维数字化中的伦理考虑”项目将研究人员、土著社区成员和三维遗产专家联合起来,为负责任的研究行为(RCR)制定一套最佳实践。这些实践促进了科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的伦理文化,认识到土著遗产3D建模是围绕非殖民化和核心方法的更广泛对话的关键部分。本文建议将RCR发现的最佳实践纳入土著文化遗产的3D数字化项目。我们建议利用集体利益、权力控制、责任和道德(CARE)原则、本土数据主权和知识共同生产(CPK)框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Considerations in the Use of 3D Technologies to Preserve and Perpetuate Indigenous Heritage

The past decade saw the proliferation of projects that use 3D and related technologies to engage with Indigenous heritage through museum collections and cultural heritage site digitization projects involving the documentation and sometimes physical replication of objects and landscapes; some of these projects involved Indigenous origin communities. Although 3D technologies have become more widespread and accessible, ethical considerations in practice lag behind. The “Ethical Considerations in Three-Dimensional Digitization of Indigenous Heritage” project unites researchers, members of Indigenous communities, and 3D heritage specialists to develop a set of best practices for the responsible conduct of research (RCR). These practices promote ethical cultures in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, recognizing Indigenous heritage 3D modeling as a critical part of the broader conversation around decolonization and core methodologies. This article proposes incorporating best practices developed from the RCR findings for 3D digitization projects of Indigenous cultural heritage. We suggest utilizing Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics (CARE) principles, Indigenous Data Sovereignty, and a co-production of knowledge (CPK) framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Antiquity
American Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
95
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信