了解澳大利亚的听力保健服务:用户的观点

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Shermin Lim, Jessica Turner, Diana Tang, Kerry Sherman, Kompal Sinha, Sharad Chawla, Simon Carney, Giriraj Singh Shekhawat, Bamini Gopinath
{"title":"了解澳大利亚的听力保健服务:用户的观点","authors":"Shermin Lim,&nbsp;Jessica Turner,&nbsp;Diana Tang,&nbsp;Kerry Sherman,&nbsp;Kompal Sinha,&nbsp;Sharad Chawla,&nbsp;Simon Carney,&nbsp;Giriraj Singh Shekhawat,&nbsp;Bamini Gopinath","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate the barriers and enablers to current hearing health-care services in Australia for middle-aged and older adults who use cochlear implants (CI) and/or hearing aids.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults aged 40 years and older from the Hearing impairment Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS), with adequate English language skills, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their hearing intervention journey. A thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts via inductive coding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-one hearing device users (15 hearing aid users, 9 CI users and 7 bimodal users) across Australia enrolled in the interview. Themes identified include hearing care management, alternative support services, patient self-management and accessibility to hearing services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings indicated the need for primary health and hearing care professionals to reconsider their clinical approach with individuals with hearing loss. Rehabilitation, primary health and hearing care services ought to work together to create an integrated hearing care journey for patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding hearing health-care access in Australia: Users' perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Shermin Lim,&nbsp;Jessica Turner,&nbsp;Diana Tang,&nbsp;Kerry Sherman,&nbsp;Kompal Sinha,&nbsp;Sharad Chawla,&nbsp;Simon Carney,&nbsp;Giriraj Singh Shekhawat,&nbsp;Bamini Gopinath\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajag.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate the barriers and enablers to current hearing health-care services in Australia for middle-aged and older adults who use cochlear implants (CI) and/or hearing aids.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults aged 40 years and older from the Hearing impairment Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS), with adequate English language skills, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their hearing intervention journey. A thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts via inductive coding.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-one hearing device users (15 hearing aid users, 9 CI users and 7 bimodal users) across Australia enrolled in the interview. Themes identified include hearing care management, alternative support services, patient self-management and accessibility to hearing services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings indicated the need for primary health and hearing care professionals to reconsider their clinical approach with individuals with hearing loss. Rehabilitation, primary health and hearing care services ought to work together to create an integrated hearing care journey for patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本定性研究旨在评估澳大利亚目前为使用人工耳蜗(CI)和/或助听器的中老年人提供听力保健服务的障碍和促进因素。 方法 邀请来自 "听力障碍成人:纵向结果研究"(HALOS)的 40 岁及以上、具有适当英语语言能力的成人参加半结构式访谈,了解他们的听力干预历程。通过归纳编码对访谈记录进行了主题分析。 结果 澳大利亚有 31 名听力设备用户(15 名助听器用户、9 名 CI 用户和 7 名双模用户)参加了访谈。确定的主题包括听力保健管理、替代性支持服务、患者自我管理和听力服务的可及性。 结论 研究结果表明,初级保健和听力保健专业人员需要重新考虑他们对听力损失患者的临床治疗方法。康复、初级保健和听力保健服务应携手合作,为患者提供综合听力保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding hearing health-care access in Australia: Users' perspectives

Objective

The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate the barriers and enablers to current hearing health-care services in Australia for middle-aged and older adults who use cochlear implants (CI) and/or hearing aids.

Methods

Adults aged 40 years and older from the Hearing impairment Adults: a Longitudinal Outcomes Study (HALOS), with adequate English language skills, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their hearing intervention journey. A thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts via inductive coding.

Results

Thirty-one hearing device users (15 hearing aid users, 9 CI users and 7 bimodal users) across Australia enrolled in the interview. Themes identified include hearing care management, alternative support services, patient self-management and accessibility to hearing services.

Conclusions

Findings indicated the need for primary health and hearing care professionals to reconsider their clinical approach with individuals with hearing loss. Rehabilitation, primary health and hearing care services ought to work together to create an integrated hearing care journey for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信