老年高血压患者的额外非药物干预

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tomoyuki Kawada
{"title":"老年高血压患者的额外非药物干预","authors":"Tomoyuki Kawada","doi":"10.1111/jch.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the Editor,</p><p>I read with interest the article by Xu and colleagues [<span>1</span>]. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP) intervention model for elderly patients with hypertension. They compared the change of blood pressure before and after the KAP intervention for a period of 1 year. The blood pressure control rate and the mean values of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) improved significantly, and they concluded that the community physician-led KAP intervention model was effective in the management of hypertension in the elderly. I have some concerns about their study.</p><p>Loucks and colleague [<span>2</span>] conducted a 2-year follow-up study to investigate the effect of the Mindfulness-Based Blood Pressure Reduction (MB-BP) program on SBP, regardless of whether they were prescribed antihypertensive medications. MB-BP was significantly associated with a reduction in SB. Although KAP and MB-BP are different concepts, a non-pharmacological approach to blood pressure management may contribute to reducing the risk of hypertension. Medical treatment and non-pharmacological approaches such as KAP and MB-BP would integrate the efficacy of reducing blood pressure.</p><p>I think that elderly hypertensive patients should pay attention to emotional disorders such as depression. Regarding the effect of mental disorder on hypertension, Jeon and colleagues [<span>3</span>] reported that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of moderate and severe depressive symptoms for incident hypertension were 1.12 (1.02–1.24) and 1.29 (1.10–1.50). They also clarified that high blood pressure was associated with a decreased risk of developing depressive symptoms. This means that depressive status would affect subsequent increase in blood pressure, and mental care is important to prevent hypertension.</p><p>Finally, Mir and colleagues [<span>4</span>] reviewed the effect of mindfulness-based meditation (MBM) on blood pressure among adults with elevated blood pressure and hypertension. MBM interventions are effective for preventing hypertension and reducing elevated blood pressure. According to a meta-analysis by Chen and colleagues [<span>5</span>], significant reductions in SBP and DBP were observed by MB interventions regardless of gender and baseline blood pressure. I suppose that KAP would become a fundamental basis to improve the efficacy of MB-BP intervention. A randomized control trial with sufficient statistical power and long-term follow-up is needed to understand the combined effect of KAP and MBM intervention on subsequent advantages for controlling hypertension.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Elderly Patients With Hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Tomoyuki Kawada\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To the Editor,</p><p>I read with interest the article by Xu and colleagues [<span>1</span>]. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP) intervention model for elderly patients with hypertension. They compared the change of blood pressure before and after the KAP intervention for a period of 1 year. The blood pressure control rate and the mean values of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) improved significantly, and they concluded that the community physician-led KAP intervention model was effective in the management of hypertension in the elderly. I have some concerns about their study.</p><p>Loucks and colleague [<span>2</span>] conducted a 2-year follow-up study to investigate the effect of the Mindfulness-Based Blood Pressure Reduction (MB-BP) program on SBP, regardless of whether they were prescribed antihypertensive medications. MB-BP was significantly associated with a reduction in SB. Although KAP and MB-BP are different concepts, a non-pharmacological approach to blood pressure management may contribute to reducing the risk of hypertension. Medical treatment and non-pharmacological approaches such as KAP and MB-BP would integrate the efficacy of reducing blood pressure.</p><p>I think that elderly hypertensive patients should pay attention to emotional disorders such as depression. Regarding the effect of mental disorder on hypertension, Jeon and colleagues [<span>3</span>] reported that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of moderate and severe depressive symptoms for incident hypertension were 1.12 (1.02–1.24) and 1.29 (1.10–1.50). They also clarified that high blood pressure was associated with a decreased risk of developing depressive symptoms. This means that depressive status would affect subsequent increase in blood pressure, and mental care is important to prevent hypertension.</p><p>Finally, Mir and colleagues [<span>4</span>] reviewed the effect of mindfulness-based meditation (MBM) on blood pressure among adults with elevated blood pressure and hypertension. MBM interventions are effective for preventing hypertension and reducing elevated blood pressure. According to a meta-analysis by Chen and colleagues [<span>5</span>], significant reductions in SBP and DBP were observed by MB interventions regardless of gender and baseline blood pressure. I suppose that KAP would become a fundamental basis to improve the efficacy of MB-BP intervention. A randomized control trial with sufficient statistical power and long-term follow-up is needed to understand the combined effect of KAP and MBM intervention on subsequent advantages for controlling hypertension.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70054\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑,我饶有兴趣地阅读了徐和他的同事[1]的文章。评价知识、态度、实践(knowledge, attitude, practice, KAP)干预模式在老年高血压患者中的效果。他们比较了KAP干预前后1年的血压变化。血压控制率和收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)均值均有明显改善,表明社区医生主导的KAP干预模式在老年高血压患者的管理中是有效的。我对他们的学习有些担心。Loucks和他的同事[2]进行了一项为期2年的随访研究,以调查基于正念的血压降低(MB-BP)计划对收缩压的影响,无论他们是否开了抗高血压药物。MB-BP与SB的降低显著相关。虽然KAP和MB-BP是不同的概念,但非药物的血压管理方法可能有助于降低高血压的风险。药物治疗和非药物方法,如KAP和MB-BP,将整合降低血压的功效。我认为老年高血压患者应该注意抑郁等情绪障碍。关于精神障碍对高血压的影响,Jeon等[3]报道,中度和重度抑郁症状对高血压的校正风险比(95%可信区间)分别为1.12(1.02-1.24)和1.29(1.10-1.50)。他们还澄清说,高血压与患抑郁症状的风险降低有关。这意味着抑郁状态会影响随后的血压升高,精神护理对预防高血压很重要。最后,Mir和他的同事回顾了正念冥想(MBM)对高血压和高血压患者血压的影响。MBM干预对预防高血压和降低血压升高是有效的。根据Chen及其同事的荟萃分析,无论性别和基线血压如何,MB干预均可显著降低收缩压和舒张压。我认为KAP将成为提高MB-BP干预疗效的根本依据。需要一项具有足够统计能力和长期随访的随机对照试验来了解KAP和MBM联合干预对控制高血压的后续优势的影响。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Additional Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Elderly Patients With Hypertension

To the Editor,

I read with interest the article by Xu and colleagues [1]. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP) intervention model for elderly patients with hypertension. They compared the change of blood pressure before and after the KAP intervention for a period of 1 year. The blood pressure control rate and the mean values of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) improved significantly, and they concluded that the community physician-led KAP intervention model was effective in the management of hypertension in the elderly. I have some concerns about their study.

Loucks and colleague [2] conducted a 2-year follow-up study to investigate the effect of the Mindfulness-Based Blood Pressure Reduction (MB-BP) program on SBP, regardless of whether they were prescribed antihypertensive medications. MB-BP was significantly associated with a reduction in SB. Although KAP and MB-BP are different concepts, a non-pharmacological approach to blood pressure management may contribute to reducing the risk of hypertension. Medical treatment and non-pharmacological approaches such as KAP and MB-BP would integrate the efficacy of reducing blood pressure.

I think that elderly hypertensive patients should pay attention to emotional disorders such as depression. Regarding the effect of mental disorder on hypertension, Jeon and colleagues [3] reported that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of moderate and severe depressive symptoms for incident hypertension were 1.12 (1.02–1.24) and 1.29 (1.10–1.50). They also clarified that high blood pressure was associated with a decreased risk of developing depressive symptoms. This means that depressive status would affect subsequent increase in blood pressure, and mental care is important to prevent hypertension.

Finally, Mir and colleagues [4] reviewed the effect of mindfulness-based meditation (MBM) on blood pressure among adults with elevated blood pressure and hypertension. MBM interventions are effective for preventing hypertension and reducing elevated blood pressure. According to a meta-analysis by Chen and colleagues [5], significant reductions in SBP and DBP were observed by MB interventions regardless of gender and baseline blood pressure. I suppose that KAP would become a fundamental basis to improve the efficacy of MB-BP intervention. A randomized control trial with sufficient statistical power and long-term follow-up is needed to understand the combined effect of KAP and MBM intervention on subsequent advantages for controlling hypertension.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信