FRC抗压和抗弯强度的精细预测模型:对合成纤维和混杂纤维的综合研究

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yassir M. Abbas, Mohammad Iqbal Khan
{"title":"FRC抗压和抗弯强度的精细预测模型:对合成纤维和混杂纤维的综合研究","authors":"Yassir M. Abbas,&nbsp;Mohammad Iqbal Khan","doi":"10.1007/s43452-025-01200-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current research on synthetic and hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is extensive; nevertheless, there is a need for robust models to assess their mechanical strength. This study comprehensively evaluates test results from 192 FRC specimens, focusing on compressive and flexural strengths. This investigation thoroughly analyzed a range of diverse concrete formulations, incorporating two types of steel fibers, polypropylene, and polyvinyl alcohol fibers, in various configurations (mono-fiber and hybrid systems). This approach aims to investigate the impact of different fiber combinations on the mechanical properties of FRC, providing insights into their synergistic effects. Additionally, the research studied several available models for predicting compressive and flexural strengths. Moreover, the study proposes a refined model employing a multiple-regression analysis approach. The findings suggest that the inclusion of hybrid steel fibrous systems notably improves compressive strength (3.4–8.2%). Hybrid steel-synthetic fibers in FRC also have positive effects (+ 2.2–4.6%), while a mono-synthetic fibrous system shows a potentially negative impact. Significant enhancements in flexural strength (up to 103.4%) were observed in hybrid steel fiber-based SFRC. However, certain mixtures in the synthetic-steel fiber series displayed insignificant strength gains, emphasizing the necessity for an optimized hybrid fibrous system. The study reveals the varying predictive capabilities of the studied available models for compressive strength, with clear limitations in accurately predicting flexural strength for synthetic-based FRC. The proposed flexural strength model exhibits significant concordance with test data, with predicted-tested value ratios within the range of 0.89–1.16. Moreover, these models exhibited high predictive accuracy for compressive strength across 53 concrete mixtures from various independent studies, achieving an average predicted-to-actual ratio of 1.0 and a notably low coefficient of variation (CV) of 14.7%. Conversely, the predictions for flexural strength were more variable, with an average ratio of 1.14 and a higher CV of 30.1%. The precision and reliability of the proposed flexural strength model underscore its efficacy for diverse fibrous systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55474,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refined predictive models for compressive and flexural strengths of FRC: a comprehensive study on synthetic and hybrid fibers\",\"authors\":\"Yassir M. Abbas,&nbsp;Mohammad Iqbal Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43452-025-01200-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The current research on synthetic and hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is extensive; nevertheless, there is a need for robust models to assess their mechanical strength. This study comprehensively evaluates test results from 192 FRC specimens, focusing on compressive and flexural strengths. This investigation thoroughly analyzed a range of diverse concrete formulations, incorporating two types of steel fibers, polypropylene, and polyvinyl alcohol fibers, in various configurations (mono-fiber and hybrid systems). This approach aims to investigate the impact of different fiber combinations on the mechanical properties of FRC, providing insights into their synergistic effects. Additionally, the research studied several available models for predicting compressive and flexural strengths. Moreover, the study proposes a refined model employing a multiple-regression analysis approach. The findings suggest that the inclusion of hybrid steel fibrous systems notably improves compressive strength (3.4–8.2%). Hybrid steel-synthetic fibers in FRC also have positive effects (+ 2.2–4.6%), while a mono-synthetic fibrous system shows a potentially negative impact. Significant enhancements in flexural strength (up to 103.4%) were observed in hybrid steel fiber-based SFRC. However, certain mixtures in the synthetic-steel fiber series displayed insignificant strength gains, emphasizing the necessity for an optimized hybrid fibrous system. The study reveals the varying predictive capabilities of the studied available models for compressive strength, with clear limitations in accurately predicting flexural strength for synthetic-based FRC. The proposed flexural strength model exhibits significant concordance with test data, with predicted-tested value ratios within the range of 0.89–1.16. Moreover, these models exhibited high predictive accuracy for compressive strength across 53 concrete mixtures from various independent studies, achieving an average predicted-to-actual ratio of 1.0 and a notably low coefficient of variation (CV) of 14.7%. Conversely, the predictions for flexural strength were more variable, with an average ratio of 1.14 and a higher CV of 30.1%. The precision and reliability of the proposed flexural strength model underscore its efficacy for diverse fibrous systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-025-01200-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-025-01200-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前对合成纤维和混杂纤维混凝土(FRC)的研究非常广泛;然而,需要一个可靠的模型来评估它们的机械强度。本研究综合评价了192个FRC试件的试验结果,重点是抗压和抗弯强度。这项研究彻底分析了一系列不同的混凝土配方,包括两种类型的钢纤维,聚丙烯和聚乙烯醇纤维,在不同的配置(单纤维和混合系统)。该方法旨在研究不同纤维组合对FRC力学性能的影响,从而深入了解其协同效应。此外,研究还研究了几种可用的预测抗压和抗弯强度的模型。此外,研究还提出了一个采用多元回归分析方法的改进模型。研究结果表明,混杂钢纤维体系的加入显著提高了抗压强度(3.4-8.2%)。混合钢-合成纤维在FRC中也有积极的影响(+ 2.2-4.6%),而单一合成纤维体系则有潜在的负面影响。混合钢纤维基SFRC的抗弯强度显著增强(高达103.4%)。然而,合成钢纤维系列中的某些混合物显示出微不足道的强度增益,强调了优化混杂纤维体系的必要性。该研究揭示了所研究的可用模型对抗压强度的不同预测能力,在准确预测合成基FRC的弯曲强度方面存在明显的局限性。所建立的抗弯强度模型与试验数据具有较好的一致性,预测值与试验值之比在0.89 ~ 1.16之间。此外,这些模型对来自各种独立研究的53种混凝土混合物的抗压强度表现出很高的预测精度,平均预测与实际比为1.0,变异系数(CV)显著低至14.7%。相反,对抗弯强度的预测变化更大,平均比率为1.14,CV值为30.1%。所提出的抗弯强度模型的精度和可靠性强调了它对不同纤维体系的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refined predictive models for compressive and flexural strengths of FRC: a comprehensive study on synthetic and hybrid fibers

The current research on synthetic and hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is extensive; nevertheless, there is a need for robust models to assess their mechanical strength. This study comprehensively evaluates test results from 192 FRC specimens, focusing on compressive and flexural strengths. This investigation thoroughly analyzed a range of diverse concrete formulations, incorporating two types of steel fibers, polypropylene, and polyvinyl alcohol fibers, in various configurations (mono-fiber and hybrid systems). This approach aims to investigate the impact of different fiber combinations on the mechanical properties of FRC, providing insights into their synergistic effects. Additionally, the research studied several available models for predicting compressive and flexural strengths. Moreover, the study proposes a refined model employing a multiple-regression analysis approach. The findings suggest that the inclusion of hybrid steel fibrous systems notably improves compressive strength (3.4–8.2%). Hybrid steel-synthetic fibers in FRC also have positive effects (+ 2.2–4.6%), while a mono-synthetic fibrous system shows a potentially negative impact. Significant enhancements in flexural strength (up to 103.4%) were observed in hybrid steel fiber-based SFRC. However, certain mixtures in the synthetic-steel fiber series displayed insignificant strength gains, emphasizing the necessity for an optimized hybrid fibrous system. The study reveals the varying predictive capabilities of the studied available models for compressive strength, with clear limitations in accurately predicting flexural strength for synthetic-based FRC. The proposed flexural strength model exhibits significant concordance with test data, with predicted-tested value ratios within the range of 0.89–1.16. Moreover, these models exhibited high predictive accuracy for compressive strength across 53 concrete mixtures from various independent studies, achieving an average predicted-to-actual ratio of 1.0 and a notably low coefficient of variation (CV) of 14.7%. Conversely, the predictions for flexural strength were more variable, with an average ratio of 1.14 and a higher CV of 30.1%. The precision and reliability of the proposed flexural strength model underscore its efficacy for diverse fibrous systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
201
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ACME) publishes both theoretical and experimental original research articles which explore or exploit new ideas and techniques in three main areas: structural engineering, mechanics of materials and materials science. The aim of the journal is to advance science related to structural engineering focusing on structures, machines and mechanical systems. The journal also promotes advancement in the area of mechanics of materials, by publishing most recent findings in elasticity, plasticity, rheology, fatigue and fracture mechanics. The third area the journal is concentrating on is materials science, with emphasis on metals, composites, etc., their structures and properties as well as methods of evaluation. In addition to research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes state-of-the-art reviews on specialized topics. All such articles have to be sent to the Editor-in-Chief before submission for pre-submission review process. Only articles approved by the Editor-in-Chief in pre-submission process can be submitted to the journal for further processing. Approval in pre-submission stage doesn''t guarantee acceptance for publication as all papers are subject to a regular referee procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信