基于核主成分分析和梯度增强决策树的大溪河污染源识别

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ying Liu, Nairui Zheng, Shuhan Yang, Fangfei Liu, Miaohan Liu, Yu Chen
{"title":"基于核主成分分析和梯度增强决策树的大溪河污染源识别","authors":"Ying Liu,&nbsp;Nairui Zheng,&nbsp;Shuhan Yang,&nbsp;Fangfei Liu,&nbsp;Miaohan Liu,&nbsp;Yu Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12241-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study focused on the Daluxi River, a small watershed and a primary tributary of the Yangtze River. Based on the nonlinear characteristics of water quality parameters and environmental factors such as meteorological and hydrological influences, a comparative analysis was conducted using Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). KPCA extracted four potential sources for both the upstream and downstream sections, accounting for 79% of the total variance in each case—an increase of 7% and 6% compared to PCA, respectively. To address the limitation of KPCA in directly revealing the relationship between principal components and the original water quality data, six machine learning algorithms—Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT)—were employed to perform regression analysis between the kernel principal components and the original water quality parameters, thereby elucidating source characteristics. The results indicated that GBDT exhibited the best fitting performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.988, MAE = 0.05, RMSE = 7.13%). Based on the extracted KPC, the Absolute Principal Component Score-Multiple Linear Regression (APCS-MLR) model was used to calculate the contribution rates of various pollution sources in the Wandang and Siming areas. The results indicate that combining KPCA with GBDT and APCS-MLR can effectively uncover the complex relationships among water quality, meteorological, and hydrological factors, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of pollution source analysis. This study advances research by using KPCA to capture nonlinear relationships and integrating machine learning for enhanced pollution source analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of water pollution sources in the Daluxi River using kernel principal component analysis and gradient boosting decision tree\",\"authors\":\"Ying Liu,&nbsp;Nairui Zheng,&nbsp;Shuhan Yang,&nbsp;Fangfei Liu,&nbsp;Miaohan Liu,&nbsp;Yu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12241-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study focused on the Daluxi River, a small watershed and a primary tributary of the Yangtze River. Based on the nonlinear characteristics of water quality parameters and environmental factors such as meteorological and hydrological influences, a comparative analysis was conducted using Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). KPCA extracted four potential sources for both the upstream and downstream sections, accounting for 79% of the total variance in each case—an increase of 7% and 6% compared to PCA, respectively. To address the limitation of KPCA in directly revealing the relationship between principal components and the original water quality data, six machine learning algorithms—Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT)—were employed to perform regression analysis between the kernel principal components and the original water quality parameters, thereby elucidating source characteristics. The results indicated that GBDT exhibited the best fitting performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.988, MAE = 0.05, RMSE = 7.13%). Based on the extracted KPC, the Absolute Principal Component Score-Multiple Linear Regression (APCS-MLR) model was used to calculate the contribution rates of various pollution sources in the Wandang and Siming areas. The results indicate that combining KPCA with GBDT and APCS-MLR can effectively uncover the complex relationships among water quality, meteorological, and hydrological factors, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of pollution source analysis. This study advances research by using KPCA to capture nonlinear relationships and integrating machine learning for enhanced pollution source analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12241-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12241-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以长江主要支流、小流域大溪河为研究对象。基于水质参数与气象、水文等环境因子的非线性特征,采用核主成分分析(KPCA)和主成分分析(PCA)进行对比分析。KPCA分别为上游和下游剖面提取了4个潜在来源,占每种情况下总方差的79%,与PCA相比分别增加了7%和6%。为了解决KPCA不能直接揭示主成分与原始水质数据之间关系的局限性,采用极限学习机(ELM)、反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、支持向量回归(SVR)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)和梯度增强决策树(GBDT) 6种机器学习算法对核主成分与原始水质参数进行回归分析。从而阐明了源特性。结果表明,GBDT的拟合效果最佳(R2 = 0.988, MAE = 0.05, RMSE = 7.13%)。基于提取的KPC,采用绝对主成分得分-多元线性回归(APCS-MLR)模型计算了万唐和思明地区各污染源的贡献率。结果表明,KPCA与GBDT、APCS-MLR相结合可以有效揭示水质、气象、水文因素之间的复杂关系,从而提高污染源分析的准确性和可靠性。本研究通过使用KPCA捕获非线性关系和集成机器学习来增强污染源分析,从而推进了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of water pollution sources in the Daluxi River using kernel principal component analysis and gradient boosting decision tree

This study focused on the Daluxi River, a small watershed and a primary tributary of the Yangtze River. Based on the nonlinear characteristics of water quality parameters and environmental factors such as meteorological and hydrological influences, a comparative analysis was conducted using Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). KPCA extracted four potential sources for both the upstream and downstream sections, accounting for 79% of the total variance in each case—an increase of 7% and 6% compared to PCA, respectively. To address the limitation of KPCA in directly revealing the relationship between principal components and the original water quality data, six machine learning algorithms—Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT)—were employed to perform regression analysis between the kernel principal components and the original water quality parameters, thereby elucidating source characteristics. The results indicated that GBDT exhibited the best fitting performance (R2 = 0.988, MAE = 0.05, RMSE = 7.13%). Based on the extracted KPC, the Absolute Principal Component Score-Multiple Linear Regression (APCS-MLR) model was used to calculate the contribution rates of various pollution sources in the Wandang and Siming areas. The results indicate that combining KPCA with GBDT and APCS-MLR can effectively uncover the complex relationships among water quality, meteorological, and hydrological factors, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of pollution source analysis. This study advances research by using KPCA to capture nonlinear relationships and integrating machine learning for enhanced pollution source analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信