Jason Dellai , Martine A. Gilles , Isabelle Clerc-Urmès , Laurent Claudon , Gilles Dietrich
{"title":"基于美发师新工具整合过程中的平滑度评估运动技能进步","authors":"Jason Dellai , Martine A. Gilles , Isabelle Clerc-Urmès , Laurent Claudon , Gilles Dietrich","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Skill acquisition is traditionally assessed based on productivity measures, such as Movement Time (MT), which reflect task execution speed. However, movement smoothness may provide additional insights into skill progression by assessing improvements in movement execution. This study evaluated the evolution of both smoothness and productivity in hairdressing following a change of tool. Kinematic recordings of 14 professional hairdressers, novice users of Ringless Scissors [RS], were taken in the laboratory over four half-days of initiation and after 4.5 months of use in the hair salon. Three types of cuts were performed with Traditional Scissors [TS], then with RS. Smoothness [Number of Peaks (NoP); Log DimensionLess Jerk (LDLJ); SPectral ARC length (SPARC)] was assessed for an elementary movement sequence, spanning tool transport to the start of cutting. MT, representing the duration of these sequences, was assessed as a measure of productivity. After introduction of the RS, smoothness decreased and MT increased. With practice, both characteristics improved. After training, SPARC showed comparable smoothness between RS and TS for two of three cutting movements, while LDLJ and NoP remained higher with TS. After 4.5 months, smoothness improved further, with LDLJ and NoP approaching TS values. Although MT was significantly reduced, it remained higher with RS than TS after 4.5 months use in the salon. These results suggest that introduction of a new tool affects not only productivity – MT – but also movement quality – smoothness. The results presented highlight the relevance of smoothness measures in occupational contexts involving motor learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104531"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing motor skill progression based on smoothness during integration of a new tool among hairdressers\",\"authors\":\"Jason Dellai , Martine A. Gilles , Isabelle Clerc-Urmès , Laurent Claudon , Gilles Dietrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Skill acquisition is traditionally assessed based on productivity measures, such as Movement Time (MT), which reflect task execution speed. However, movement smoothness may provide additional insights into skill progression by assessing improvements in movement execution. This study evaluated the evolution of both smoothness and productivity in hairdressing following a change of tool. Kinematic recordings of 14 professional hairdressers, novice users of Ringless Scissors [RS], were taken in the laboratory over four half-days of initiation and after 4.5 months of use in the hair salon. Three types of cuts were performed with Traditional Scissors [TS], then with RS. Smoothness [Number of Peaks (NoP); Log DimensionLess Jerk (LDLJ); SPectral ARC length (SPARC)] was assessed for an elementary movement sequence, spanning tool transport to the start of cutting. MT, representing the duration of these sequences, was assessed as a measure of productivity. After introduction of the RS, smoothness decreased and MT increased. With practice, both characteristics improved. After training, SPARC showed comparable smoothness between RS and TS for two of three cutting movements, while LDLJ and NoP remained higher with TS. After 4.5 months, smoothness improved further, with LDLJ and NoP approaching TS values. Although MT was significantly reduced, it remained higher with RS than TS after 4.5 months use in the salon. These results suggest that introduction of a new tool affects not only productivity – MT – but also movement quality – smoothness. The results presented highlight the relevance of smoothness measures in occupational contexts involving motor learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000675\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing motor skill progression based on smoothness during integration of a new tool among hairdressers
Skill acquisition is traditionally assessed based on productivity measures, such as Movement Time (MT), which reflect task execution speed. However, movement smoothness may provide additional insights into skill progression by assessing improvements in movement execution. This study evaluated the evolution of both smoothness and productivity in hairdressing following a change of tool. Kinematic recordings of 14 professional hairdressers, novice users of Ringless Scissors [RS], were taken in the laboratory over four half-days of initiation and after 4.5 months of use in the hair salon. Three types of cuts were performed with Traditional Scissors [TS], then with RS. Smoothness [Number of Peaks (NoP); Log DimensionLess Jerk (LDLJ); SPectral ARC length (SPARC)] was assessed for an elementary movement sequence, spanning tool transport to the start of cutting. MT, representing the duration of these sequences, was assessed as a measure of productivity. After introduction of the RS, smoothness decreased and MT increased. With practice, both characteristics improved. After training, SPARC showed comparable smoothness between RS and TS for two of three cutting movements, while LDLJ and NoP remained higher with TS. After 4.5 months, smoothness improved further, with LDLJ and NoP approaching TS values. Although MT was significantly reduced, it remained higher with RS than TS after 4.5 months use in the salon. These results suggest that introduction of a new tool affects not only productivity – MT – but also movement quality – smoothness. The results presented highlight the relevance of smoothness measures in occupational contexts involving motor learning.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.