{"title":"基于整合利益相关者视角的社会生态系统框架理解水治理——以太湖水产养殖污染治理为例","authors":"Liting Xu , Sophia Shuang Chen , Zheng Guo , Yuke Yuan , Yu Xu , Jiaqi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying the mechanisms behind interactions within the social-ecological system (SES) of the environmental micro-governance process is crucial for promoting sustainable environmental improvement. To illustrate the operational logic and the SES interaction mechanisms of water governance, a representative area of aquaculture pollution governance (APG) in Yixing City, China, was selected as a case study. In this study, the SES theory was integrated with stakeholders' perceptions, and a modified framework for APG was constructed. Key variables, SES action situations, social-ecological benefits, aquaculturists' perceptions of governance, and its influencing factors were analyzed through interviews, questionnaires, field surveys and an ordered logit model. Results reveal that the implementation of APG involved a complex SES interaction process, in which ecological performance is prioritized over social performance. In this collective action, aquaculturists' perceptions shifted in response to policy implementation, with the reported support and satisfaction degrees being lower than response degree. Additionally, the three dimensions of policy perception were influenced by different SES variables. A central role was played by the government in promoting collective action for APG, with fair compensation for aquaculturists identified as a crucial factor. The dynamic interactions within the SES of water governance were revealed, and aquaculturists' perceptions of governance in improving the lake's ecological environment, along with the factors shaping their perceptions, were clarified. The findings provide insights for addressing complex water governance issues. Understanding the SES dynamics and stakeholders' perceptions can offer valuable references for policymakers to improve the sustainability and socio-ecological benefits of water governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 107951"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding water governance based on the social-ecological system framework integrating stakeholder perspective: A case study of aquaculture pollution governance in Taihu Lake, China\",\"authors\":\"Liting Xu , Sophia Shuang Chen , Zheng Guo , Yuke Yuan , Yu Xu , Jiaqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying the mechanisms behind interactions within the social-ecological system (SES) of the environmental micro-governance process is crucial for promoting sustainable environmental improvement. To illustrate the operational logic and the SES interaction mechanisms of water governance, a representative area of aquaculture pollution governance (APG) in Yixing City, China, was selected as a case study. In this study, the SES theory was integrated with stakeholders' perceptions, and a modified framework for APG was constructed. Key variables, SES action situations, social-ecological benefits, aquaculturists' perceptions of governance, and its influencing factors were analyzed through interviews, questionnaires, field surveys and an ordered logit model. Results reveal that the implementation of APG involved a complex SES interaction process, in which ecological performance is prioritized over social performance. In this collective action, aquaculturists' perceptions shifted in response to policy implementation, with the reported support and satisfaction degrees being lower than response degree. Additionally, the three dimensions of policy perception were influenced by different SES variables. A central role was played by the government in promoting collective action for APG, with fair compensation for aquaculturists identified as a crucial factor. The dynamic interactions within the SES of water governance were revealed, and aquaculturists' perceptions of governance in improving the lake's ecological environment, along with the factors shaping their perceptions, were clarified. The findings provide insights for addressing complex water governance issues. Understanding the SES dynamics and stakeholders' perceptions can offer valuable references for policymakers to improve the sustainability and socio-ecological benefits of water governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001489\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding water governance based on the social-ecological system framework integrating stakeholder perspective: A case study of aquaculture pollution governance in Taihu Lake, China
Identifying the mechanisms behind interactions within the social-ecological system (SES) of the environmental micro-governance process is crucial for promoting sustainable environmental improvement. To illustrate the operational logic and the SES interaction mechanisms of water governance, a representative area of aquaculture pollution governance (APG) in Yixing City, China, was selected as a case study. In this study, the SES theory was integrated with stakeholders' perceptions, and a modified framework for APG was constructed. Key variables, SES action situations, social-ecological benefits, aquaculturists' perceptions of governance, and its influencing factors were analyzed through interviews, questionnaires, field surveys and an ordered logit model. Results reveal that the implementation of APG involved a complex SES interaction process, in which ecological performance is prioritized over social performance. In this collective action, aquaculturists' perceptions shifted in response to policy implementation, with the reported support and satisfaction degrees being lower than response degree. Additionally, the three dimensions of policy perception were influenced by different SES variables. A central role was played by the government in promoting collective action for APG, with fair compensation for aquaculturists identified as a crucial factor. The dynamic interactions within the SES of water governance were revealed, and aquaculturists' perceptions of governance in improving the lake's ecological environment, along with the factors shaping their perceptions, were clarified. The findings provide insights for addressing complex water governance issues. Understanding the SES dynamics and stakeholders' perceptions can offer valuable references for policymakers to improve the sustainability and socio-ecological benefits of water governance.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.