分子相互作用的综合生物物理表征:sfgfp -纳米体复合物的案例研究

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Aysha K. Demeler , James Bosco , Matthew J. Sydor , Michelle Nemetchek , Saeed Mortezazadeh , Liam Kerr , Sophia Bird , Roza Gabdullina , Cindee Yates-Hansen , Levi J. McClelland , Ekaterina Voronina , Trushar R. Patel , Borries Demeler
{"title":"分子相互作用的综合生物物理表征:sfgfp -纳米体复合物的案例研究","authors":"Aysha K. Demeler ,&nbsp;James Bosco ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Sydor ,&nbsp;Michelle Nemetchek ,&nbsp;Saeed Mortezazadeh ,&nbsp;Liam Kerr ,&nbsp;Sophia Bird ,&nbsp;Roza Gabdullina ,&nbsp;Cindee Yates-Hansen ,&nbsp;Levi J. McClelland ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Voronina ,&nbsp;Trushar R. Patel ,&nbsp;Borries Demeler","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compares several analytical biophysical methods for investigating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in solution, using the interaction between superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) and its anti-sfGFP nanobody enhancer as a model system. Techniques evaluated include microscale thermophoresis, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation with multi-wavelength and fluorescence detection, isothermal titration calorimetry, and analytical size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle static light scattering and dynamic light scattering. Each method was assessed for information content, dynamic range, precision, and complementarity. The results consistently indicate a single-digit nanomolar dissociation constant and 1:1 stoichiometry for the interaction. While each technique offers unique insights into binding affinity, thermodynamics, and stoichiometry of the interaction, the multi-method approach provides a more complete and reliable characterization of PPIs. The study demonstrates how combining multiple complementary techniques enhances the robustness of PPI analysis in solution-phase conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"703 ","pages":"Article 115859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative biophysical characterization of molecular interactions: A case study with the sfGFP–nanobody complex\",\"authors\":\"Aysha K. Demeler ,&nbsp;James Bosco ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Sydor ,&nbsp;Michelle Nemetchek ,&nbsp;Saeed Mortezazadeh ,&nbsp;Liam Kerr ,&nbsp;Sophia Bird ,&nbsp;Roza Gabdullina ,&nbsp;Cindee Yates-Hansen ,&nbsp;Levi J. McClelland ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Voronina ,&nbsp;Trushar R. Patel ,&nbsp;Borries Demeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study compares several analytical biophysical methods for investigating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in solution, using the interaction between superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) and its anti-sfGFP nanobody enhancer as a model system. Techniques evaluated include microscale thermophoresis, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation with multi-wavelength and fluorescence detection, isothermal titration calorimetry, and analytical size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle static light scattering and dynamic light scattering. Each method was assessed for information content, dynamic range, precision, and complementarity. The results consistently indicate a single-digit nanomolar dissociation constant and 1:1 stoichiometry for the interaction. While each technique offers unique insights into binding affinity, thermodynamics, and stoichiometry of the interaction, the multi-method approach provides a more complete and reliable characterization of PPIs. The study demonstrates how combining multiple complementary techniques enhances the robustness of PPI analysis in solution-phase conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"703 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725000971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725000971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以超级文件夹绿色荧光蛋白(sfGFP)及其抗sfGFP纳米体增强剂之间的相互作用为模型系统,比较了几种用于研究溶液中蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)的分析生物物理方法。评估的技术包括微尺度热泳、荧光相关光谱、多波长和荧光检测的分析性超离心、等温滴定量热法、多角度静态光散射和动态光散射的分析性粒径排除色谱。评估了每种方法的信息含量、动态范围、精度和互补性。结果一致表明,一个个位数的纳摩尔解离常数和1:1的化学计量的相互作用。虽然每种技术都对相互作用的结合亲和力、热力学和化学计量学提供了独特的见解,但多方法方法提供了更完整、更可靠的PPIs表征。该研究展示了如何结合多种互补技术提高了溶液相条件下PPI分析的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrative biophysical characterization of molecular interactions: A case study with the sfGFP–nanobody complex

Integrative biophysical characterization of molecular interactions: A case study with the sfGFP–nanobody complex
This study compares several analytical biophysical methods for investigating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in solution, using the interaction between superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) and its anti-sfGFP nanobody enhancer as a model system. Techniques evaluated include microscale thermophoresis, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation with multi-wavelength and fluorescence detection, isothermal titration calorimetry, and analytical size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle static light scattering and dynamic light scattering. Each method was assessed for information content, dynamic range, precision, and complementarity. The results consistently indicate a single-digit nanomolar dissociation constant and 1:1 stoichiometry for the interaction. While each technique offers unique insights into binding affinity, thermodynamics, and stoichiometry of the interaction, the multi-method approach provides a more complete and reliable characterization of PPIs. The study demonstrates how combining multiple complementary techniques enhances the robustness of PPI analysis in solution-phase conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical biochemistry
Analytical biochemistry 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field. The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology. The journal has been particularly active in: -Analytical techniques for biological molecules- Aptamer selection and utilization- Biosensors- Chromatography- Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis- Electrochemical methods- Electrophoresis- Enzyme characterization methods- Immunological approaches- Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids- Metabolomics- Nano level techniques- Optical spectroscopy in all its forms. The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信