评估贸易效率:来自贸易优先、环境优先和平衡战略的见解

IF 6.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yu Zhu , Dawei Wang
{"title":"评估贸易效率:来自贸易优先、环境优先和平衡战略的见解","authors":"Yu Zhu ,&nbsp;Dawei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.seps.2025.102223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess international trade efficiency, incorporating carbon dioxide emissions as an undesirable output and addressing biases in previous assessments that overlooked emissions embodied in trade. The model introduces three distinct strategic objectives: a trade priority, an environmental priority, and a balanced approach between trade and environmental concerns. The proposed framework is then applied to a sample of 42 economies.</div><div>Trade efficiency is a crucial economic measure, as it reflects an economy's capacity to maximize productive output while minimizing environmental and resource costs, thereby fostering sustainable economic growth and enhancing global competitiveness. The findings demonstrate that while the Trade Priority Strategy (TPS) yields the lowest overall average efficiency under both constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions, the optimal strategy for maximizing efficiency varies significantly across individual economies. Although significant efficiency differences exist across the 42 economies, within each economy, the differences in efficiency values and rankings across the three strategies are relatively minor. A comparison between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD economies reveals that the OECD group demonstrates higher efficiency under all strategies. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to align trade and environmental policies in pursuit of sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22033,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing trade Efficiency: Insights from trade priority, environmental priority, and balanced strategies\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhu ,&nbsp;Dawei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seps.2025.102223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess international trade efficiency, incorporating carbon dioxide emissions as an undesirable output and addressing biases in previous assessments that overlooked emissions embodied in trade. The model introduces three distinct strategic objectives: a trade priority, an environmental priority, and a balanced approach between trade and environmental concerns. The proposed framework is then applied to a sample of 42 economies.</div><div>Trade efficiency is a crucial economic measure, as it reflects an economy's capacity to maximize productive output while minimizing environmental and resource costs, thereby fostering sustainable economic growth and enhancing global competitiveness. The findings demonstrate that while the Trade Priority Strategy (TPS) yields the lowest overall average efficiency under both constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions, the optimal strategy for maximizing efficiency varies significantly across individual economies. Although significant efficiency differences exist across the 42 economies, within each economy, the differences in efficiency values and rankings across the three strategies are relatively minor. A comparison between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD economies reveals that the OECD group demonstrates higher efficiency under all strategies. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to align trade and environmental policies in pursuit of sustainable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-economic Planning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-economic Planning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000722\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用数据包络分析(DEA)来评估国际贸易效率,将二氧化碳排放纳入不受欢迎的产出,并解决了以往评估中忽视贸易中体现的排放的偏见。该模式引入了三个不同的战略目标:贸易优先、环境优先以及贸易与环境关切之间的平衡方法。然后将提议的框架应用于42个经济体的样本。贸易效率是一项至关重要的经济指标,因为它反映了一个经济体在最大限度地提高生产产出的同时,将环境和资源成本降至最低的能力,从而促进可持续的经济增长,增强全球竞争力。研究结果表明,尽管在恒定规模回报(CRS)和可变规模回报(VRS)假设下,贸易优先战略(TPS)产生的总体平均效率最低,但在各个经济体中,效率最大化的最佳策略差异很大。尽管42个经济体之间存在显著的效率差异,但在每个经济体内部,三种战略之间的效率值和排名差异相对较小。经济合作与发展组织(OECD)与非经合组织经济体的比较表明,经合组织集团在所有战略下都表现出更高的效率。这些结果为寻求协调贸易和环境政策以实现可持续发展的政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing trade Efficiency: Insights from trade priority, environmental priority, and balanced strategies
This study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess international trade efficiency, incorporating carbon dioxide emissions as an undesirable output and addressing biases in previous assessments that overlooked emissions embodied in trade. The model introduces three distinct strategic objectives: a trade priority, an environmental priority, and a balanced approach between trade and environmental concerns. The proposed framework is then applied to a sample of 42 economies.
Trade efficiency is a crucial economic measure, as it reflects an economy's capacity to maximize productive output while minimizing environmental and resource costs, thereby fostering sustainable economic growth and enhancing global competitiveness. The findings demonstrate that while the Trade Priority Strategy (TPS) yields the lowest overall average efficiency under both constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions, the optimal strategy for maximizing efficiency varies significantly across individual economies. Although significant efficiency differences exist across the 42 economies, within each economy, the differences in efficiency values and rankings across the three strategies are relatively minor. A comparison between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD economies reveals that the OECD group demonstrates higher efficiency under all strategies. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to align trade and environmental policies in pursuit of sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socio-economic Planning Sciences
Socio-economic Planning Sciences OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
13.10%
发文量
294
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Studies directed toward the more effective utilization of existing resources, e.g. mathematical programming models of health care delivery systems with relevance to more effective program design; systems analysis of fire outbreaks and its relevance to the location of fire stations; statistical analysis of the efficiency of a developing country economy or industry. Studies relating to the interaction of various segments of society and technology, e.g. the effects of government health policies on the utilization and design of hospital facilities; the relationship between housing density and the demands on public transportation or other service facilities: patterns and implications of urban development and air or water pollution. Studies devoted to the anticipations of and response to future needs for social, health and other human services, e.g. the relationship between industrial growth and the development of educational resources in affected areas; investigation of future demands for material and child health resources in a developing country; design of effective recycling in an urban setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信