Leela Dilkes-Hoffman , Helen Ross , Bronwyn Laycock , Paul Lant , Steven Pratt
{"title":"在一个不断变化的世界里,澳大利亚公众对塑料的态度出人意料地保持不变","authors":"Leela Dilkes-Hoffman , Helen Ross , Bronwyn Laycock , Paul Lant , Steven Pratt","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work investigates whether the Australian public still view plastics as a serious environmental issue and how perceptions of alternative materials may have shifted over time. Results were gathered through a survey of 1003 representative Australians. The results show that attitudes have remained constant, with some strengthening of original positions. This is made more noteworthy given the significant shifts in context that occurred during the five-year interval (including the COVID-19 pandemic). Plastics are still viewed as the key environmental concern and 85 % of respondents express a desire to reduce use of disposable plastics. All alternative materials are viewed positively, and 80 % percent of respondents agree they would like more of the plastic items they use to be biodegradable. This is despite understanding of biodegradable plastics decreasing. Combined, these results show policymakers that there is a high degree of public support for action on plastics and the development of alternative materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108329"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public attitudes towards plastics in Australia are surprisingly constant in a changing world\",\"authors\":\"Leela Dilkes-Hoffman , Helen Ross , Bronwyn Laycock , Paul Lant , Steven Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work investigates whether the Australian public still view plastics as a serious environmental issue and how perceptions of alternative materials may have shifted over time. Results were gathered through a survey of 1003 representative Australians. The results show that attitudes have remained constant, with some strengthening of original positions. This is made more noteworthy given the significant shifts in context that occurred during the five-year interval (including the COVID-19 pandemic). Plastics are still viewed as the key environmental concern and 85 % of respondents express a desire to reduce use of disposable plastics. All alternative materials are viewed positively, and 80 % percent of respondents agree they would like more of the plastic items they use to be biodegradable. This is despite understanding of biodegradable plastics decreasing. Combined, these results show policymakers that there is a high degree of public support for action on plastics and the development of alternative materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public attitudes towards plastics in Australia are surprisingly constant in a changing world
This work investigates whether the Australian public still view plastics as a serious environmental issue and how perceptions of alternative materials may have shifted over time. Results were gathered through a survey of 1003 representative Australians. The results show that attitudes have remained constant, with some strengthening of original positions. This is made more noteworthy given the significant shifts in context that occurred during the five-year interval (including the COVID-19 pandemic). Plastics are still viewed as the key environmental concern and 85 % of respondents express a desire to reduce use of disposable plastics. All alternative materials are viewed positively, and 80 % percent of respondents agree they would like more of the plastic items they use to be biodegradable. This is despite understanding of biodegradable plastics decreasing. Combined, these results show policymakers that there is a high degree of public support for action on plastics and the development of alternative materials.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.