迈向土壤安全:了解新南威尔士州土壤侵蚀足迹及其影响

Anilkumar Hunakunti, Alex McBratney, Budiman Minasny
{"title":"迈向土壤安全:了解新南威尔士州土壤侵蚀足迹及其影响","authors":"Anilkumar Hunakunti,&nbsp;Alex McBratney,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A key challenge in maintaining soil security is assessing and mitigating soil degradation. The soil footprint is a promising indicator for quantifying degradation impacts, yet it remains underdeveloped, lacking a standardized definition and a comprehensive calculation framework. This study introduces a generalized soil footprint framework, integrating three key components: (1) Threat to soil, representing degradation processes such as soil water erosion or salinization; (2) Soil service ratio, which quantifies changes in soil services such as crop yield or Available Water Capacity relative to their natural state; and (3) Inherent mitigation capability, reflecting the soil's resilience to degradation. Applied in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, we calculated two soil erosion footprints using crop yield and Available Water Capacity (AWC) as indicators of soil services. In both cases, soil erosion rate, specifically water erosion, was used as the threat to soil, while erosion risk capability represented the soil's intrinsic mitigation capacity. Results show that oats had the highest soil erosion footprint due to lower yields, whereas wheat, barley, sorghum, and grain legumes had smaller footprints. An inverse relationship between soil erosion footprint and crop receipts (i.e., farm revenue from crop production) highlights the economic risks of soil erosion, particularly in high-revenue regions like the Northwest Slopes and Plains and the Riverina. AWC-based soil erosion footprints were highest in coastal and dryland cropping areas, indicating greater erosion stress, while irrigated systems, plantation forests, and managed resource protection areas showed lower footprints, reflecting better resilience. Modified pastures, native forests, nature conservation areas, and minimal-use lands had higher footprints. This study highlights the need to integrate soil service ratios and erosion risk capability alongside erosion rates for a more comprehensive approach to soil sustainability and mitigation strategies. The proposed soil footprint framework provides a valuable tool for evaluating human impacts on soil services, guiding targeted soil conservation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards soil security: Understanding soil erosion footprints and their implications in NSW\",\"authors\":\"Anilkumar Hunakunti,&nbsp;Alex McBratney,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A key challenge in maintaining soil security is assessing and mitigating soil degradation. The soil footprint is a promising indicator for quantifying degradation impacts, yet it remains underdeveloped, lacking a standardized definition and a comprehensive calculation framework. This study introduces a generalized soil footprint framework, integrating three key components: (1) Threat to soil, representing degradation processes such as soil water erosion or salinization; (2) Soil service ratio, which quantifies changes in soil services such as crop yield or Available Water Capacity relative to their natural state; and (3) Inherent mitigation capability, reflecting the soil's resilience to degradation. Applied in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, we calculated two soil erosion footprints using crop yield and Available Water Capacity (AWC) as indicators of soil services. In both cases, soil erosion rate, specifically water erosion, was used as the threat to soil, while erosion risk capability represented the soil's intrinsic mitigation capacity. Results show that oats had the highest soil erosion footprint due to lower yields, whereas wheat, barley, sorghum, and grain legumes had smaller footprints. An inverse relationship between soil erosion footprint and crop receipts (i.e., farm revenue from crop production) highlights the economic risks of soil erosion, particularly in high-revenue regions like the Northwest Slopes and Plains and the Riverina. AWC-based soil erosion footprints were highest in coastal and dryland cropping areas, indicating greater erosion stress, while irrigated systems, plantation forests, and managed resource protection areas showed lower footprints, reflecting better resilience. Modified pastures, native forests, nature conservation areas, and minimal-use lands had higher footprints. This study highlights the need to integrate soil service ratios and erosion risk capability alongside erosion rates for a more comprehensive approach to soil sustainability and mitigation strategies. The proposed soil footprint framework provides a valuable tool for evaluating human impacts on soil services, guiding targeted soil conservation efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006225000097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006225000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维持土壤安全的一个关键挑战是评估和减轻土壤退化。土壤足迹是一种很有前景的量化退化影响的指标,但目前还不发达,缺乏标准化的定义和综合的计算框架。本研究引入了一个广义的土壤足迹框架,该框架整合了三个关键组成部分:(1)对土壤的威胁,代表土壤水分侵蚀或盐碱化等退化过程;(2)土壤服务比,量化作物产量或有效水量等土壤服务相对于自然状态的变化;(3)内在缓解能力,反映土壤对退化的恢复能力。应用于澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW),我们使用作物产量和有效水分容量(AWC)作为土壤服务指标计算了两个土壤侵蚀足迹。在这两种情况下,土壤侵蚀速率,特别是水侵蚀被用作对土壤的威胁,而侵蚀风险能力代表土壤的内在缓解能力。结果表明,由于产量较低,燕麦的土壤侵蚀足迹最高,而小麦、大麦、高粱和谷物豆类的足迹较小。土壤侵蚀足迹与作物收入(即来自作物生产的农业收入)之间的反比关系凸显了土壤侵蚀的经济风险,特别是在西北斜坡和平原等高收入地区以及Riverina地区。基于awc的土壤侵蚀足迹在沿海和旱地种植区最高,表明侵蚀压力更大,而灌溉系统、人工林和管理资源保护区的足迹较低,反映出更好的恢复能力。改良牧场、原生林、自然保护区和最小利用地的足迹较高。本研究强调需要将土壤服务比率和侵蚀风险能力与侵蚀率结合起来,以便对土壤可持续性和缓解战略采取更全面的方法。提出的土壤足迹框架为评估人类对土壤服务的影响,指导有针对性的土壤保持工作提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards soil security: Understanding soil erosion footprints and their implications in NSW
A key challenge in maintaining soil security is assessing and mitigating soil degradation. The soil footprint is a promising indicator for quantifying degradation impacts, yet it remains underdeveloped, lacking a standardized definition and a comprehensive calculation framework. This study introduces a generalized soil footprint framework, integrating three key components: (1) Threat to soil, representing degradation processes such as soil water erosion or salinization; (2) Soil service ratio, which quantifies changes in soil services such as crop yield or Available Water Capacity relative to their natural state; and (3) Inherent mitigation capability, reflecting the soil's resilience to degradation. Applied in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, we calculated two soil erosion footprints using crop yield and Available Water Capacity (AWC) as indicators of soil services. In both cases, soil erosion rate, specifically water erosion, was used as the threat to soil, while erosion risk capability represented the soil's intrinsic mitigation capacity. Results show that oats had the highest soil erosion footprint due to lower yields, whereas wheat, barley, sorghum, and grain legumes had smaller footprints. An inverse relationship between soil erosion footprint and crop receipts (i.e., farm revenue from crop production) highlights the economic risks of soil erosion, particularly in high-revenue regions like the Northwest Slopes and Plains and the Riverina. AWC-based soil erosion footprints were highest in coastal and dryland cropping areas, indicating greater erosion stress, while irrigated systems, plantation forests, and managed resource protection areas showed lower footprints, reflecting better resilience. Modified pastures, native forests, nature conservation areas, and minimal-use lands had higher footprints. This study highlights the need to integrate soil service ratios and erosion risk capability alongside erosion rates for a more comprehensive approach to soil sustainability and mitigation strategies. The proposed soil footprint framework provides a valuable tool for evaluating human impacts on soil services, guiding targeted soil conservation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信