{"title":"纳米塑料和微塑料聚苯乙烯颗粒对阿兹特克透明菌的生态毒理学效应:物理和化学表面性质影响的综合研究","authors":"Agnieszka Dąbrowska , Evita Strode , Łukasz Kurach , Marcin Stachowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ecotoxicological effects of nanoplastic (NPs) and microplastic (MPs) polystyrene particles' (PS) on <em>Hyalella azteca</em> were studied in three tests designed to investigate various hypotheses and explore potential mechanisms of interaction between MPs, NPs and this species. The following materials were used: fluorescent nanoplastic nanoPS of 15–18 nm diameter, non-modified nanoPS 25 nm, and functionalized (aminometyl)polystyrene (PS-NH<sub>2</sub>). Short-term exposure of 7 and 14 days, and long-term exposure of 42 days, were conducted using three different types of PS at varying concentrations (0.01, 0.18, 1, 18, 180 mg L<sup>−1</sup>). The experiments were carried out through two methods: PS introduced via food and PS dispersed in the environment (referred to as the “medium”). The effects were comprehensively assessed by measuring the activity of selected oxidative stress biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase AChE, catalase CAT, and glutathione s-transferase GST), and monitoring parameters such as size, growth, reproduction rate, and the presence of possible malformations. The statistically significant effect was observed with PS-NH<sub>2</sub> (37–74 μm) and fluorescent nanoPS (15–18 nm), whereas nanoPS of 25 nm were nearly inert. The discussion is focused on four observed aspects: (i) the impact of the surface characteristics and functional group modifications of PS particles on their overall effect on biota, (ii) the limitations of using a typical concentration parameter for tests comparison, with a proposal to adopt total surface area of MPs and NPs instead – reflecting the overall surface exposed to the environment, rather than solely relying on the mass or volume, (iii) the influence of feeding regimen (exposure at varying concentrations in food or medium compared to no exposure) on the ecotoxicological effect, and (iv) the potential of <em>Hyalella azteca</em> as a sentinel species for monitoring microplastic transport in both freshwater and brackish waters environments. Finally, the physical and chemical properties of all three PS types were characterized to better understand their mutual interaction with biota from the material perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contaminant hydrology","volume":"272 ","pages":"Article 104574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecotoxicological Effects of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Polystyrene Particles on Hyalella azteca: A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Physical and Chemical Surface Properties\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Dąbrowska , Evita Strode , Łukasz Kurach , Marcin Stachowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ecotoxicological effects of nanoplastic (NPs) and microplastic (MPs) polystyrene particles' (PS) on <em>Hyalella azteca</em> were studied in three tests designed to investigate various hypotheses and explore potential mechanisms of interaction between MPs, NPs and this species. The following materials were used: fluorescent nanoplastic nanoPS of 15–18 nm diameter, non-modified nanoPS 25 nm, and functionalized (aminometyl)polystyrene (PS-NH<sub>2</sub>). Short-term exposure of 7 and 14 days, and long-term exposure of 42 days, were conducted using three different types of PS at varying concentrations (0.01, 0.18, 1, 18, 180 mg L<sup>−1</sup>). The experiments were carried out through two methods: PS introduced via food and PS dispersed in the environment (referred to as the “medium”). The effects were comprehensively assessed by measuring the activity of selected oxidative stress biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase AChE, catalase CAT, and glutathione s-transferase GST), and monitoring parameters such as size, growth, reproduction rate, and the presence of possible malformations. The statistically significant effect was observed with PS-NH<sub>2</sub> (37–74 μm) and fluorescent nanoPS (15–18 nm), whereas nanoPS of 25 nm were nearly inert. The discussion is focused on four observed aspects: (i) the impact of the surface characteristics and functional group modifications of PS particles on their overall effect on biota, (ii) the limitations of using a typical concentration parameter for tests comparison, with a proposal to adopt total surface area of MPs and NPs instead – reflecting the overall surface exposed to the environment, rather than solely relying on the mass or volume, (iii) the influence of feeding regimen (exposure at varying concentrations in food or medium compared to no exposure) on the ecotoxicological effect, and (iv) the potential of <em>Hyalella azteca</em> as a sentinel species for monitoring microplastic transport in both freshwater and brackish waters environments. Finally, the physical and chemical properties of all three PS types were characterized to better understand their mutual interaction with biota from the material perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contaminant hydrology\",\"volume\":\"272 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contaminant hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169772225000798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contaminant hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169772225000798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ecotoxicological Effects of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Polystyrene Particles on Hyalella azteca: A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Physical and Chemical Surface Properties
The ecotoxicological effects of nanoplastic (NPs) and microplastic (MPs) polystyrene particles' (PS) on Hyalella azteca were studied in three tests designed to investigate various hypotheses and explore potential mechanisms of interaction between MPs, NPs and this species. The following materials were used: fluorescent nanoplastic nanoPS of 15–18 nm diameter, non-modified nanoPS 25 nm, and functionalized (aminometyl)polystyrene (PS-NH2). Short-term exposure of 7 and 14 days, and long-term exposure of 42 days, were conducted using three different types of PS at varying concentrations (0.01, 0.18, 1, 18, 180 mg L−1). The experiments were carried out through two methods: PS introduced via food and PS dispersed in the environment (referred to as the “medium”). The effects were comprehensively assessed by measuring the activity of selected oxidative stress biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase AChE, catalase CAT, and glutathione s-transferase GST), and monitoring parameters such as size, growth, reproduction rate, and the presence of possible malformations. The statistically significant effect was observed with PS-NH2 (37–74 μm) and fluorescent nanoPS (15–18 nm), whereas nanoPS of 25 nm were nearly inert. The discussion is focused on four observed aspects: (i) the impact of the surface characteristics and functional group modifications of PS particles on their overall effect on biota, (ii) the limitations of using a typical concentration parameter for tests comparison, with a proposal to adopt total surface area of MPs and NPs instead – reflecting the overall surface exposed to the environment, rather than solely relying on the mass or volume, (iii) the influence of feeding regimen (exposure at varying concentrations in food or medium compared to no exposure) on the ecotoxicological effect, and (iv) the potential of Hyalella azteca as a sentinel species for monitoring microplastic transport in both freshwater and brackish waters environments. Finally, the physical and chemical properties of all three PS types were characterized to better understand their mutual interaction with biota from the material perspective.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contaminant Hydrology is an international journal publishing scientific articles pertaining to the contamination of subsurface water resources. Emphasis is placed on investigations of the physical, chemical, and biological processes influencing the behavior and fate of organic and inorganic contaminants in the unsaturated (vadose) and saturated (groundwater) zones, as well as at groundwater-surface water interfaces. The ecological impacts of contaminants transported both from and to aquifers are of interest. Articles on contamination of surface water only, without a link to groundwater, are out of the scope. Broad latitude is allowed in identifying contaminants of interest, and include legacy and emerging pollutants, nutrients, nanoparticles, pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses, protozoa), microplastics, and various constituents associated with energy production (e.g., methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide).
The journal''s scope embraces a wide range of topics including: experimental investigations of contaminant sorption, diffusion, transformation, volatilization and transport in the surface and subsurface; characterization of soil and aquifer properties only as they influence contaminant behavior; development and testing of mathematical models of contaminant behaviour; innovative techniques for restoration of contaminated sites; development of new tools or techniques for monitoring the extent of soil and groundwater contamination; transformation of contaminants in the hyporheic zone; effects of contaminants traversing the hyporheic zone on surface water and groundwater ecosystems; subsurface carbon sequestration and/or turnover; and migration of fluids associated with energy production into groundwater.