柬埔寨种族灭绝后三代人的长期情感和非情感大脑变化

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Emilie A. Caspar , Guillaume P. Pech , Pheak Ros
{"title":"柬埔寨种族灭绝后三代人的长期情感和非情感大脑变化","authors":"Emilie A. Caspar ,&nbsp;Guillaume P. Pech ,&nbsp;Pheak Ros","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature has largely indicated that trauma can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alterations in brain functioning. However, to what extent these alterations remain present decades after the traumatic event, and how the next generations may also suffer from them, remains unclear, especially in a non-Western culture. Uniquely, the present project focused on survivors of the Cambodian genocide and the subsequent two generations to determine whether brain alterations are observable approximately five decades after the traumatic event and in subsequent generations from the same society. Using portable electroencephalography (EEG), we used four experimental tasks—two targeting non-affective processing (i.e., sensory gating, oddball) and two targeting affective processing (i.e., emotion recognition, threat processing). Results indicated that although the rate of PTSD symptoms was similar across generations, the affective reaction to threat for the LPP and FMθ was primarily observed or intensified in the directly affected generation (i.e., G0), regardless of the presence of PTSD. We also observed that G0 exhibited reduced attenuation over standard tones in the oddball task for the N100 and a reduced sensory gating effect on the auditory P200. The present study underscores that affective and non-affective alterations might still be present decades after a trauma, but are not necessarily observable in subsequent generations. Our results also support a dissociation between reported PTSD symptoms and neural alterations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 109028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term affective and non-affective brain alterations across three generations following the genocide in Cambodia\",\"authors\":\"Emilie A. Caspar ,&nbsp;Guillaume P. Pech ,&nbsp;Pheak Ros\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The literature has largely indicated that trauma can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alterations in brain functioning. However, to what extent these alterations remain present decades after the traumatic event, and how the next generations may also suffer from them, remains unclear, especially in a non-Western culture. Uniquely, the present project focused on survivors of the Cambodian genocide and the subsequent two generations to determine whether brain alterations are observable approximately five decades after the traumatic event and in subsequent generations from the same society. Using portable electroencephalography (EEG), we used four experimental tasks—two targeting non-affective processing (i.e., sensory gating, oddball) and two targeting affective processing (i.e., emotion recognition, threat processing). Results indicated that although the rate of PTSD symptoms was similar across generations, the affective reaction to threat for the LPP and FMθ was primarily observed or intensified in the directly affected generation (i.e., G0), regardless of the presence of PTSD. We also observed that G0 exhibited reduced attenuation over standard tones in the oddball task for the N100 and a reduced sensory gating effect on the auditory P200. The present study underscores that affective and non-affective alterations might still be present decades after a trauma, but are not necessarily observable in subsequent generations. Our results also support a dissociation between reported PTSD symptoms and neural alterations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125000468\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125000468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献大多表明,创伤会导致创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和大脑功能的改变。然而,在创伤事件发生几十年后,这些变化在多大程度上仍然存在,以及下一代如何也会受到它们的影响,仍然不清楚,特别是在非西方文化中。独特的是,本项目侧重于柬埔寨种族灭绝的幸存者及其后的两代人,以确定在创伤事件发生约五十年后以及同一社会的后代中是否可以观察到大脑的变化。使用便携式脑电图(EEG),我们使用了四个实验任务-两个针对非情感处理(即感觉门控,古怪)和两个针对情感处理(即情绪识别,威胁处理)。结果表明,尽管PTSD症状的发生率在各代之间相似,但LPP和FMθ对威胁的情感反应主要在直接受影响的一代(即G0)观察到或增强,无论是否存在PTSD。我们还观察到,G0在N100的古怪任务中表现出比标准音调更低的衰减,在听觉P200上表现出更低的感觉门控效应。目前的研究强调,情感和非情感的改变可能在创伤后几十年仍然存在,但不一定在后代中观察到。我们的结果也支持报道的PTSD症状和神经改变之间的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term affective and non-affective brain alterations across three generations following the genocide in Cambodia
The literature has largely indicated that trauma can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alterations in brain functioning. However, to what extent these alterations remain present decades after the traumatic event, and how the next generations may also suffer from them, remains unclear, especially in a non-Western culture. Uniquely, the present project focused on survivors of the Cambodian genocide and the subsequent two generations to determine whether brain alterations are observable approximately five decades after the traumatic event and in subsequent generations from the same society. Using portable electroencephalography (EEG), we used four experimental tasks—two targeting non-affective processing (i.e., sensory gating, oddball) and two targeting affective processing (i.e., emotion recognition, threat processing). Results indicated that although the rate of PTSD symptoms was similar across generations, the affective reaction to threat for the LPP and FMθ was primarily observed or intensified in the directly affected generation (i.e., G0), regardless of the presence of PTSD. We also observed that G0 exhibited reduced attenuation over standard tones in the oddball task for the N100 and a reduced sensory gating effect on the auditory P200. The present study underscores that affective and non-affective alterations might still be present decades after a trauma, but are not necessarily observable in subsequent generations. Our results also support a dissociation between reported PTSD symptoms and neural alterations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信