Safinaz M. Alshiakh , Abdullah S. Algarni , Ghadeer Doman , Ahmad Aalam , Roaa H. Alabbadi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯医护人员和普通民众的烧伤急救知识:横断面研究","authors":"Safinaz M. Alshiakh , Abdullah S. Algarni , Ghadeer Doman , Ahmad Aalam , Roaa H. Alabbadi","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Burns are among the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries. Prompt and effective first aid is crucial in mitigating the severity of burn injuries. This study assessed the current burn first aid knowledge level among healthcare workers and non-healthcare individuals in Saudi Arabia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of healthcare workers and the general population in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online questionnaire-based survey composed of two main parts: demographic characteristics of the participants and five case-scenario-based multiple-choice questions (scald burns, flame burns, contact burns, chemical burns, and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 748 participants were included in the study (355 healthcare workers with a response rate of 92.2 % and 393 general population). More than one-third (36.6 %) of the participants reported receiving formal training in first aid. However, this training covered first aid in burn injuries in 26.3 % of cases. Healthcare workers were more knowledgeable than the general population as regards scald burns (p < 0.001), flame burns (p = 0.028), contact burns (p < 0.001), and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns (p < 0.001). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only job category and history of receiving any training in first aid were significantly associated with insufficient knowledge about the management of burns among both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although healthcare workers demonstrated better knowledge than the general population regarding the 1st aid management for different burn scenarios, both groups’ knowledge levels require improvement. Thus, comprehensive health and safety education, with a specific focus on burn safety, is highly recommended for all healthcare workers and the general population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 107507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First aid knowledge for burn injuries among healthcare workers and the general population in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Safinaz M. Alshiakh , Abdullah S. Algarni , Ghadeer Doman , Ahmad Aalam , Roaa H. Alabbadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Burns are among the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries. Prompt and effective first aid is crucial in mitigating the severity of burn injuries. This study assessed the current burn first aid knowledge level among healthcare workers and non-healthcare individuals in Saudi Arabia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of healthcare workers and the general population in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online questionnaire-based survey composed of two main parts: demographic characteristics of the participants and five case-scenario-based multiple-choice questions (scald burns, flame burns, contact burns, chemical burns, and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 748 participants were included in the study (355 healthcare workers with a response rate of 92.2 % and 393 general population). More than one-third (36.6 %) of the participants reported receiving formal training in first aid. However, this training covered first aid in burn injuries in 26.3 % of cases. Healthcare workers were more knowledgeable than the general population as regards scald burns (p < 0.001), flame burns (p = 0.028), contact burns (p < 0.001), and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns (p < 0.001). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only job category and history of receiving any training in first aid were significantly associated with insufficient knowledge about the management of burns among both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although healthcare workers demonstrated better knowledge than the general population regarding the 1st aid management for different burn scenarios, both groups’ knowledge levels require improvement. Thus, comprehensive health and safety education, with a specific focus on burn safety, is highly recommended for all healthcare workers and the general population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 107507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925001366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925001366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
First aid knowledge for burn injuries among healthcare workers and the general population in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study
Burns are among the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries. Prompt and effective first aid is crucial in mitigating the severity of burn injuries. This study assessed the current burn first aid knowledge level among healthcare workers and non-healthcare individuals in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of healthcare workers and the general population in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online questionnaire-based survey composed of two main parts: demographic characteristics of the participants and five case-scenario-based multiple-choice questions (scald burns, flame burns, contact burns, chemical burns, and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns).
Results
A total of 748 participants were included in the study (355 healthcare workers with a response rate of 92.2 % and 393 general population). More than one-third (36.6 %) of the participants reported receiving formal training in first aid. However, this training covered first aid in burn injuries in 26.3 % of cases. Healthcare workers were more knowledgeable than the general population as regards scald burns (p < 0.001), flame burns (p = 0.028), contact burns (p < 0.001), and liquid petroleum gas cylinder burns (p < 0.001). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only job category and history of receiving any training in first aid were significantly associated with insufficient knowledge about the management of burns among both groups.
Conclusion
Although healthcare workers demonstrated better knowledge than the general population regarding the 1st aid management for different burn scenarios, both groups’ knowledge levels require improvement. Thus, comprehensive health and safety education, with a specific focus on burn safety, is highly recommended for all healthcare workers and the general population.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.