采用调谐液柱阻尼器和调谐质量阻尼器的浮式海上风力发电机抑振性能比较

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Dongdong Han , Xin Li , Wenhua Wang , Xiaohui Su
{"title":"采用调谐液柱阻尼器和调谐质量阻尼器的浮式海上风力发电机抑振性能比较","authors":"Dongdong Han ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Wenhua Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Su","doi":"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are exposed to the combined effects of wind and waves for a long time, and the additional floating platform motion often leads to excessive vibrations in the tower structure, which in turn affects the safety and reliability of the whole system. Effective vibration suppression of these vibrations has always been a key issue in research. In this study, two of the most commonly used passive structural control devices used to mitigate vibration in FOWTs are considered: tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and tuned liquid column dampers (TLCDs). A comparative evaluation of their vibration mitigation performance applied to the FOWT is carried out. First, to implement the optimal design of parameters for the TMD and TLCD, simplified 3-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mathematical models for the FOWT with the TMD/TLCD are derived and established. The simplified mathematical model is further validated, and the optimal design and parameter study of the TMD and TLCD are investigated using the 5 MW barge FOWT as the benchmark research object. Evaluations and comparisons of the vibration control performance of TMD and TLCD are performed on the basis of fully coupled time domain analysis in OpenFAST, considering the FOWT in operational, nonoperational, and extreme conditions. The results reveal a significant difference in the performance of the TMD and TLCD for tower vibration suppression under various conditions, with more prominent performance under nonoperational and extreme conditions. In addition, the stroke limitation condition of the TMD has a greater influence on performance. The TMD with a large stroke has the most prominent performance, whereas TLCD effectively mitigates tower vibration under different conditions through small liquid column motion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19403,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Engineering","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 121285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vibration suppression performance comparison of floating offshore wind turbines using a tuned liquid column damper and a tuned mass damper\",\"authors\":\"Dongdong Han ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Wenhua Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are exposed to the combined effects of wind and waves for a long time, and the additional floating platform motion often leads to excessive vibrations in the tower structure, which in turn affects the safety and reliability of the whole system. Effective vibration suppression of these vibrations has always been a key issue in research. In this study, two of the most commonly used passive structural control devices used to mitigate vibration in FOWTs are considered: tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and tuned liquid column dampers (TLCDs). A comparative evaluation of their vibration mitigation performance applied to the FOWT is carried out. First, to implement the optimal design of parameters for the TMD and TLCD, simplified 3-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mathematical models for the FOWT with the TMD/TLCD are derived and established. The simplified mathematical model is further validated, and the optimal design and parameter study of the TMD and TLCD are investigated using the 5 MW barge FOWT as the benchmark research object. Evaluations and comparisons of the vibration control performance of TMD and TLCD are performed on the basis of fully coupled time domain analysis in OpenFAST, considering the FOWT in operational, nonoperational, and extreme conditions. The results reveal a significant difference in the performance of the TMD and TLCD for tower vibration suppression under various conditions, with more prominent performance under nonoperational and extreme conditions. In addition, the stroke limitation condition of the TMD has a greater influence on performance. The TMD with a large stroke has the most prominent performance, whereas TLCD effectively mitigates tower vibration under different conditions through small liquid column motion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Engineering\",\"volume\":\"330 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801825009989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801825009989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浮式海上风电机组长期处于风浪综合作用下,附加的浮式平台运动往往会导致塔架结构过度振动,进而影响整个系统的安全性和可靠性。有效抑制这些振动一直是研究的关键问题。在本研究中,考虑了用于减轻fowt振动的两种最常用的被动结构控制装置:调谐质量阻尼器(TMDs)和调谐液柱阻尼器(tlcd)。并对其减振性能进行了对比评价。首先,为了实现TMD和TLCD的参数优化设计,推导并建立了TMD/TLCD的简化三自由度数学模型。进一步验证了简化的数学模型,并以5mw驳船FOWT为基准研究对象,对TMD和TLCD的优化设计和参数研究进行了研究。基于OpenFAST的全耦合时域分析,对TMD和TLCD的振动控制性能进行了评估和比较,考虑了fot在工作、非工作和极端条件下的振动控制性能。结果表明,TMD和TLCD在不同工况下对塔架的抑振性能存在显著差异,在非工况和极端工况下的抑振性能更为突出。此外,TMD的行程限制条件对其性能影响较大。大冲程的TMD性能最为突出,而TLCD通过小的液柱运动可以有效地减轻不同工况下塔的振动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vibration suppression performance comparison of floating offshore wind turbines using a tuned liquid column damper and a tuned mass damper
Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are exposed to the combined effects of wind and waves for a long time, and the additional floating platform motion often leads to excessive vibrations in the tower structure, which in turn affects the safety and reliability of the whole system. Effective vibration suppression of these vibrations has always been a key issue in research. In this study, two of the most commonly used passive structural control devices used to mitigate vibration in FOWTs are considered: tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and tuned liquid column dampers (TLCDs). A comparative evaluation of their vibration mitigation performance applied to the FOWT is carried out. First, to implement the optimal design of parameters for the TMD and TLCD, simplified 3-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mathematical models for the FOWT with the TMD/TLCD are derived and established. The simplified mathematical model is further validated, and the optimal design and parameter study of the TMD and TLCD are investigated using the 5 MW barge FOWT as the benchmark research object. Evaluations and comparisons of the vibration control performance of TMD and TLCD are performed on the basis of fully coupled time domain analysis in OpenFAST, considering the FOWT in operational, nonoperational, and extreme conditions. The results reveal a significant difference in the performance of the TMD and TLCD for tower vibration suppression under various conditions, with more prominent performance under nonoperational and extreme conditions. In addition, the stroke limitation condition of the TMD has a greater influence on performance. The TMD with a large stroke has the most prominent performance, whereas TLCD effectively mitigates tower vibration under different conditions through small liquid column motion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Engineering
Ocean Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
34.00%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
8.1 months
期刊介绍: Ocean Engineering provides a medium for the publication of original research and development work in the field of ocean engineering. Ocean Engineering seeks papers in the following topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信