反射干涉显微镜光学切片:软界面定量成像

IF 3.9 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cathie Ventalon, Oksana Kirichuk, Yotam Navon, Yan Chastagnier, Laurent Heux, Ralf P. Richter, Lionel Bureau and Delphine Débarre*, 
{"title":"反射干涉显微镜光学切片:软界面定量成像","authors":"Cathie Ventalon,&nbsp;Oksana Kirichuk,&nbsp;Yotam Navon,&nbsp;Yan Chastagnier,&nbsp;Laurent Heux,&nbsp;Ralf P. Richter,&nbsp;Lionel Bureau and Delphine Débarre*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c0085210.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Reflection interference contrast microscopy (RICM, also known as interference reflection microscopy) and related techniques have become of wide interest to the biophysical, soft matter, and biochemistry communities owing to their exquisite sensitivity for characterizing thin films or individual nanoscopic objects adsorbed onto surfaces, or for monitoring cell–substrate interactions. Over the recent years, striking progress has been made to improve the sensitivity and the quantitative analysis of RICM. Its use in more complex environments, with spurious reflections stemming from a variety of structures in the sample, remains however challenging. In this paper, we demonstrate two optical sectioning methods that effectively reduce such background and can be readily implemented in a conventional RICM setup: line confocal detection and structured illumination microscopy. We characterize experimentally the benefits to image quality and demonstrate the use of the methods for quantitative imaging of complex biological and biomimetic samples: cellular membranes, thin organic films, biofunctional surfaces. We then discuss the benefits of each method and provide guidelines to arbitrate between sectioning and signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, we provide a detailed description of our experimental setup and a home-written image acquisition and processing software that should allow the interested reader to duplicate such a setup on a home-built or commercial microscope.</p>","PeriodicalId":50,"journal":{"name":"Langmuir","volume":"41 15","pages":"10040–10051 10040–10051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical Sectioning for Reflection Interference Microscopy: Quantitative Imaging at Soft Interfaces\",\"authors\":\"Cathie Ventalon,&nbsp;Oksana Kirichuk,&nbsp;Yotam Navon,&nbsp;Yan Chastagnier,&nbsp;Laurent Heux,&nbsp;Ralf P. Richter,&nbsp;Lionel Bureau and Delphine Débarre*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c0085210.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Reflection interference contrast microscopy (RICM, also known as interference reflection microscopy) and related techniques have become of wide interest to the biophysical, soft matter, and biochemistry communities owing to their exquisite sensitivity for characterizing thin films or individual nanoscopic objects adsorbed onto surfaces, or for monitoring cell–substrate interactions. Over the recent years, striking progress has been made to improve the sensitivity and the quantitative analysis of RICM. Its use in more complex environments, with spurious reflections stemming from a variety of structures in the sample, remains however challenging. In this paper, we demonstrate two optical sectioning methods that effectively reduce such background and can be readily implemented in a conventional RICM setup: line confocal detection and structured illumination microscopy. We characterize experimentally the benefits to image quality and demonstrate the use of the methods for quantitative imaging of complex biological and biomimetic samples: cellular membranes, thin organic films, biofunctional surfaces. We then discuss the benefits of each method and provide guidelines to arbitrate between sectioning and signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, we provide a detailed description of our experimental setup and a home-written image acquisition and processing software that should allow the interested reader to duplicate such a setup on a home-built or commercial microscope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langmuir\",\"volume\":\"41 15\",\"pages\":\"10040–10051 10040–10051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langmuir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langmuir","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反射干涉对比显微镜(RICM,也称为干涉反射显微镜)和相关技术由于其在表征薄膜或吸附在表面上的单个纳米级物体或监测细胞-基质相互作用方面的灵敏度而引起了生物物理学、软物质和生物化学界的广泛兴趣。近年来,在提高RICM的敏感性和定量分析方面取得了显著进展。然而,它在更复杂的环境中的使用仍然具有挑战性,因为样品中的各种结构会产生虚假反射。在本文中,我们展示了两种光学切片方法,有效地减少了这种背景,可以很容易地在传统的RICM设置中实现:线共聚焦检测和结构照明显微镜。我们通过实验描述了图像质量的好处,并演示了复杂生物和仿生样品的定量成像方法的使用:细胞膜,薄有机膜,生物功能表面。然后我们讨论了每种方法的优点,并提供了在切片和信噪比之间进行仲裁的指导方针。最后,我们提供了我们的实验设置和一个家庭编写的图像采集和处理软件的详细描述,应该允许有兴趣的读者复制这样的设置在家用或商用显微镜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optical Sectioning for Reflection Interference Microscopy: Quantitative Imaging at Soft Interfaces

Optical Sectioning for Reflection Interference Microscopy: Quantitative Imaging at Soft Interfaces

Reflection interference contrast microscopy (RICM, also known as interference reflection microscopy) and related techniques have become of wide interest to the biophysical, soft matter, and biochemistry communities owing to their exquisite sensitivity for characterizing thin films or individual nanoscopic objects adsorbed onto surfaces, or for monitoring cell–substrate interactions. Over the recent years, striking progress has been made to improve the sensitivity and the quantitative analysis of RICM. Its use in more complex environments, with spurious reflections stemming from a variety of structures in the sample, remains however challenging. In this paper, we demonstrate two optical sectioning methods that effectively reduce such background and can be readily implemented in a conventional RICM setup: line confocal detection and structured illumination microscopy. We characterize experimentally the benefits to image quality and demonstrate the use of the methods for quantitative imaging of complex biological and biomimetic samples: cellular membranes, thin organic films, biofunctional surfaces. We then discuss the benefits of each method and provide guidelines to arbitrate between sectioning and signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, we provide a detailed description of our experimental setup and a home-written image acquisition and processing software that should allow the interested reader to duplicate such a setup on a home-built or commercial microscope.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Langmuir
Langmuir 化学-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
1464
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Langmuir is an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles in the following subject categories: Colloids: surfactants and self-assembly, dispersions, emulsions, foams Interfaces: adsorption, reactions, films, forces Biological Interfaces: biocolloids, biomolecular and biomimetic materials Materials: nano- and mesostructured materials, polymers, gels, liquid crystals Electrochemistry: interfacial charge transfer, charge transport, electrocatalysis, electrokinetic phenomena, bioelectrochemistry Devices and Applications: sensors, fluidics, patterning, catalysis, photonic crystals However, when high-impact, original work is submitted that does not fit within the above categories, decisions to accept or decline such papers will be based on one criteria: What Would Irving Do? Langmuir ranks #2 in citations out of 136 journals in the category of Physical Chemistry with 113,157 total citations. The journal received an Impact Factor of 4.384*. This journal is also indexed in the categories of Materials Science (ranked #1) and Multidisciplinary Chemistry (ranked #5).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信