幼儿骨折的可脱靴与石膏治疗

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ariane Boutin, Keith Colaco, Jennifer Stimec, Mark Camp, Unni Narayanan, Maala Bhatt, Naveen Poonai, Andrew R. Willan, Ramona Cook, Marie-Lyne Nault, Sasha Carsen, Kathy Boutis
{"title":"幼儿骨折的可脱靴与石膏治疗","authors":"Ariane Boutin, Keith Colaco, Jennifer Stimec, Mark Camp, Unni Narayanan, Maala Bhatt, Naveen Poonai, Andrew R. Willan, Ramona Cook, Marie-Lyne Nault, Sasha Carsen, Kathy Boutis","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceToddler’s fractures (TF) of the tibia are commonly treated with casts and fracture clinic follow-up. However, a prefabricated removable boot might be sufficient and reduce unnecessary follow-up.ObjectivesTo determine whether pain in children with TF treated with a removable boot is not worse than those managed with a circumferential cast at 4 weeks postinjury.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pragmatic, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted between October 2019 and February 2024 at 4 urban, tertiary care, pediatric Canadian emergency departments. Children aged between 9 months and 4 years with a radiograph-visible TF were eligible for inclusion.InterventionsPrefabricated walking boot for up to 3 weeks (removable at caregivers’ discretion) vs circumferential cast immobilization (site standard of care) for 3 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasureThe primary outcome was pain score, measured with the Evaluation Enfant Douleur (EVENDOL) scale (maximum score: 15). Additional outcomes included return to baseline activities, complications, parental satisfaction and care burden.ResultsIn 129 enrolled children, the mean (SD) age was 2.2 (0.8) years, and 56 children (43%) were female. Of these, 118 children (92%) completed the 4-week follow-up, and the boot (n = 64) vs cast (n = 54) groups demonstrated mean (SD) EVENDOL pain scores of 1.21 (1.54) and 1.76 (2.13), respectively (difference, −0.55; 95% CI, −1.23 to 0.13). The percentage of participants who returned to baseline activities “almost all of the time” was 49 of 64 children (77%) in the boot group and 22 of 54 (41%) in the cast group (difference, 36%; 95% CI, 9%-63%). Skin complications occurred in both groups (boot: 46 total complications [72%], with 5 stage 1 pressure sores; cast: 27 total complications (50%), with 1 pressure sore]; difference, 22%; 95% CI, −6% to 50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of caregivers who were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment (difference, 9%; 95% CI, −24% to 43%). Fewer caregivers reported bathing care burden (difference, −32%; 95% CI, −47% to −18%) and challenges with carrying the child (difference, −21%; 95% CI, −27% to −15%) in the boot vs cast group.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this multicenter randomized clinical trial examining the management of children with TF, a removable boot without physician follow-up was noninferior to circumferential casting with respect to pain recovery. While there was a clinically relevant but not statistically significant trend toward more skin complications in the boot group, there was no difference in caregiver satisfaction, and the boot strategy demonstrated reduced childcare-related challenges.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03971448?cond=NCT03971448&amp;amp;amp;rank=1\">NCT03971448</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removable Boot vs Casting of Toddler’s Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Ariane Boutin, Keith Colaco, Jennifer Stimec, Mark Camp, Unni Narayanan, Maala Bhatt, Naveen Poonai, Andrew R. Willan, Ramona Cook, Marie-Lyne Nault, Sasha Carsen, Kathy Boutis\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceToddler’s fractures (TF) of the tibia are commonly treated with casts and fracture clinic follow-up. However, a prefabricated removable boot might be sufficient and reduce unnecessary follow-up.ObjectivesTo determine whether pain in children with TF treated with a removable boot is not worse than those managed with a circumferential cast at 4 weeks postinjury.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pragmatic, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted between October 2019 and February 2024 at 4 urban, tertiary care, pediatric Canadian emergency departments. Children aged between 9 months and 4 years with a radiograph-visible TF were eligible for inclusion.InterventionsPrefabricated walking boot for up to 3 weeks (removable at caregivers’ discretion) vs circumferential cast immobilization (site standard of care) for 3 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasureThe primary outcome was pain score, measured with the Evaluation Enfant Douleur (EVENDOL) scale (maximum score: 15). Additional outcomes included return to baseline activities, complications, parental satisfaction and care burden.ResultsIn 129 enrolled children, the mean (SD) age was 2.2 (0.8) years, and 56 children (43%) were female. Of these, 118 children (92%) completed the 4-week follow-up, and the boot (n = 64) vs cast (n = 54) groups demonstrated mean (SD) EVENDOL pain scores of 1.21 (1.54) and 1.76 (2.13), respectively (difference, −0.55; 95% CI, −1.23 to 0.13). The percentage of participants who returned to baseline activities “almost all of the time” was 49 of 64 children (77%) in the boot group and 22 of 54 (41%) in the cast group (difference, 36%; 95% CI, 9%-63%). Skin complications occurred in both groups (boot: 46 total complications [72%], with 5 stage 1 pressure sores; cast: 27 total complications (50%), with 1 pressure sore]; difference, 22%; 95% CI, −6% to 50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of caregivers who were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment (difference, 9%; 95% CI, −24% to 43%). Fewer caregivers reported bathing care burden (difference, −32%; 95% CI, −47% to −18%) and challenges with carrying the child (difference, −21%; 95% CI, −27% to −15%) in the boot vs cast group.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this multicenter randomized clinical trial examining the management of children with TF, a removable boot without physician follow-up was noninferior to circumferential casting with respect to pain recovery. While there was a clinically relevant but not statistically significant trend toward more skin complications in the boot group, there was no difference in caregiver satisfaction, and the boot strategy demonstrated reduced childcare-related challenges.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03971448?cond=NCT03971448&amp;amp;amp;rank=1\\\">NCT03971448</jats:ext-link>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0560\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:幼儿胫骨骨折(TF)通常采用石膏和骨折临床随访治疗。然而,一个预制的可移动的引导可能是足够的,并减少不必要的后续。目的探讨在损伤后4周,采用活动靴治疗的TF患儿的疼痛是否比采用环形石膏治疗的患儿更严重。设计、环境和参与者这项实用、多中心、评估盲、非劣效性随机临床试验于2019年10月至2024年2月在加拿大4个城市三级保健儿科急诊科进行。年龄在9个月至4岁之间且有x线可见的TF的儿童符合纳入条件。干预措施:自制步行靴长达3周(可自行拆卸)与周向石膏固定(部位标准护理)3周。主要结局和测量主要结局为疼痛评分,采用EVENDOL量表测量(最高评分:15分)。其他结果包括恢复基线活动、并发症、父母满意度和护理负担。结果129例入组儿童中,平均(SD)年龄为2.2(0.8)岁,女性56例(43%)。其中,118名儿童(92%)完成了为期4周的随访,boot组(n = 64)和cast组(n = 54)的平均(SD) EVENDOL疼痛评分分别为1.21(1.54)和1.76(2.13)(差异为- 0.55;95% CI,−1.23 ~ 0.13)。“几乎所有时间”回到基线活动的参与者的百分比是,靴子组的64名儿童中有49名(77%),而演员组的54名儿童中有22名(41%)(差异为36%;95% ci, 9%-63%)。两组患者均出现皮肤并发症(共46例(72%),其中5例出现1期压疮;铸型:总并发症27例(50%),压疮1例;差异,22%;95% CI, - 6% ~ 50%)。对治疗感到满意或非常满意的护理人员百分比差异无统计学意义(差异为9%;95% CI, - 24% ~ 43%)。较少的护理人员报告洗澡护理负担(差异为- 32%;95% CI, - 47%至- 18%)和携带孩子的挑战(差异,- 21%;95% CI, - 27%至- 15%)。结论和相关性在这项检查儿童TF治疗的多中心随机临床试验中,在疼痛恢复方面,无需医生随访的可拆卸靴不逊于周向铸造。虽然临床相关但统计上不显著的趋势是靴子组出现了更多的皮肤并发症,但护理人员满意度没有差异,而且靴子策略显示出减少了与儿童护理相关的挑战。临床试验注册号:NCT03971448
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removable Boot vs Casting of Toddler’s Fractures
ImportanceToddler’s fractures (TF) of the tibia are commonly treated with casts and fracture clinic follow-up. However, a prefabricated removable boot might be sufficient and reduce unnecessary follow-up.ObjectivesTo determine whether pain in children with TF treated with a removable boot is not worse than those managed with a circumferential cast at 4 weeks postinjury.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pragmatic, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted between October 2019 and February 2024 at 4 urban, tertiary care, pediatric Canadian emergency departments. Children aged between 9 months and 4 years with a radiograph-visible TF were eligible for inclusion.InterventionsPrefabricated walking boot for up to 3 weeks (removable at caregivers’ discretion) vs circumferential cast immobilization (site standard of care) for 3 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasureThe primary outcome was pain score, measured with the Evaluation Enfant Douleur (EVENDOL) scale (maximum score: 15). Additional outcomes included return to baseline activities, complications, parental satisfaction and care burden.ResultsIn 129 enrolled children, the mean (SD) age was 2.2 (0.8) years, and 56 children (43%) were female. Of these, 118 children (92%) completed the 4-week follow-up, and the boot (n = 64) vs cast (n = 54) groups demonstrated mean (SD) EVENDOL pain scores of 1.21 (1.54) and 1.76 (2.13), respectively (difference, −0.55; 95% CI, −1.23 to 0.13). The percentage of participants who returned to baseline activities “almost all of the time” was 49 of 64 children (77%) in the boot group and 22 of 54 (41%) in the cast group (difference, 36%; 95% CI, 9%-63%). Skin complications occurred in both groups (boot: 46 total complications [72%], with 5 stage 1 pressure sores; cast: 27 total complications (50%), with 1 pressure sore]; difference, 22%; 95% CI, −6% to 50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of caregivers who were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment (difference, 9%; 95% CI, −24% to 43%). Fewer caregivers reported bathing care burden (difference, −32%; 95% CI, −47% to −18%) and challenges with carrying the child (difference, −21%; 95% CI, −27% to −15%) in the boot vs cast group.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this multicenter randomized clinical trial examining the management of children with TF, a removable boot without physician follow-up was noninferior to circumferential casting with respect to pain recovery. While there was a clinically relevant but not statistically significant trend toward more skin complications in the boot group, there was no difference in caregiver satisfaction, and the boot strategy demonstrated reduced childcare-related challenges.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03971448
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信