用于增强生物柴油氧化稳定性的合成和天然抗氧化剂的技术经济评价

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Henry Kahimbi, Emmanuel Stephen Monge, Baraka Kichonge, Thomas Kivevele
{"title":"用于增强生物柴油氧化稳定性的合成和天然抗氧化剂的技术经济评价","authors":"Henry Kahimbi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Stephen Monge,&nbsp;Baraka Kichonge,&nbsp;Thomas Kivevele","doi":"10.1002/ese3.2071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The oxidation stability of biodiesel is a critical factor affecting its storage and performance, necessitating the use of antioxidants to enhance its shelf life and reliability. Both natural and synthetic antioxidants have proven effective in improving the oxidation stability of biodiesel, with numerous studies demonstrating their ability to extend the induction period and delay oxidative degradation. However, while the technical efficacy of these antioxidants is well-documented, the techno-economic analysis that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of using natural versus synthetic antioxidants remains unexplored. This creates uncertainty in selecting the most sustainable and economically viable antioxidant option. This study aimed to conduct a techno-economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of synthetic and natural antioxidants in stabilizing biodiesel. The study evaluated synthetic antioxidants, specifically hydrogenated methoxy eugenol, and natural antioxidants derived from the methanolic extract of wild loquat plants, along with a comparison to commonly used synthetic antioxidants. Comprehensive simulations and modeling were conducted using Aspen Plus® V10 commercial simulation software in a block-wise manner. The technical performance was assessed by considering the quantities and qualities of biodiesel, glycerol, and antioxidants. The synthetic antioxidant processes resulted in negative net present values and longer payback periods of 11.7 to 17.8 years, while natural antioxidants showed shorter payback periods ranging from 3.8 to 12 years. Natural antioxidants, particularly those extracted from clove wastes and wild loquat plant parts, demonstrated superior techno-economic performance with the lowest operating and raw materials costs, shortest payback period, highest internal rate of return (IRR), and best profitability. Therefore, natural antioxidants are the most economically viable option for biodiesel stabilization, outperforming synthetic antioxidants in terms of operating costs, payback period, IRR, and profitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 4","pages":"1622-1637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Evaluation of Synthetic and Natural Antioxidants Used for Enhancing Oxidation Stability of Biodiesel\",\"authors\":\"Henry Kahimbi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Stephen Monge,&nbsp;Baraka Kichonge,&nbsp;Thomas Kivevele\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.2071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The oxidation stability of biodiesel is a critical factor affecting its storage and performance, necessitating the use of antioxidants to enhance its shelf life and reliability. Both natural and synthetic antioxidants have proven effective in improving the oxidation stability of biodiesel, with numerous studies demonstrating their ability to extend the induction period and delay oxidative degradation. However, while the technical efficacy of these antioxidants is well-documented, the techno-economic analysis that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of using natural versus synthetic antioxidants remains unexplored. This creates uncertainty in selecting the most sustainable and economically viable antioxidant option. This study aimed to conduct a techno-economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of synthetic and natural antioxidants in stabilizing biodiesel. The study evaluated synthetic antioxidants, specifically hydrogenated methoxy eugenol, and natural antioxidants derived from the methanolic extract of wild loquat plants, along with a comparison to commonly used synthetic antioxidants. Comprehensive simulations and modeling were conducted using Aspen Plus® V10 commercial simulation software in a block-wise manner. The technical performance was assessed by considering the quantities and qualities of biodiesel, glycerol, and antioxidants. The synthetic antioxidant processes resulted in negative net present values and longer payback periods of 11.7 to 17.8 years, while natural antioxidants showed shorter payback periods ranging from 3.8 to 12 years. Natural antioxidants, particularly those extracted from clove wastes and wild loquat plant parts, demonstrated superior techno-economic performance with the lowest operating and raw materials costs, shortest payback period, highest internal rate of return (IRR), and best profitability. Therefore, natural antioxidants are the most economically viable option for biodiesel stabilization, outperforming synthetic antioxidants in terms of operating costs, payback period, IRR, and profitability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"1622-1637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2071\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物柴油的氧化稳定性是影响其储存和性能的一个关键因素,因此有必要使用抗氧化剂来提高其保质期和可靠性。大量研究证明,天然和合成抗氧化剂都能有效提高生物柴油的氧化稳定性,并能延长诱导期和延缓氧化降解。然而,虽然这些抗氧化剂的技术功效已得到充分证实,但评估使用天然抗氧化剂与合成抗氧化剂的成本效益的技术经济分析却仍未进行。这为选择最具可持续性和经济可行性的抗氧化剂方案带来了不确定性。本研究旨在进行技术经济分析,比较合成抗氧化剂和天然抗氧化剂在稳定生物柴油方面的成本效益。研究评估了合成抗氧化剂(特别是氢化甲氧基丁香酚)和从野生枇杷植物甲醇提取物中提取的天然抗氧化剂,并与常用的合成抗氧化剂进行了比较。使用 Aspen Plus® V10 商业模拟软件以分块方式进行了全面模拟和建模。通过考虑生物柴油、甘油和抗氧化剂的数量和质量,对技术性能进行了评估。合成抗氧化剂工艺的净现值为负值,投资回收期较长,为 11.7 至 17.8 年,而天然抗氧化剂的投资回收期较短,为 3.8 至 12 年。天然抗氧化剂,尤其是从丁香废料和野生枇杷植物部分中提取的抗氧化剂,表现出卓越的技术经济效益,运营成本和原材料成本最低,投资回收期最短,内部收益率(IRR)最高,盈利能力最强。因此,天然抗氧化剂是生物柴油稳定化最经济可行的选择,在运营成本、投资回收期、内部收益率和盈利能力方面均优于合成抗氧化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Synthetic and Natural Antioxidants Used for Enhancing Oxidation Stability of Biodiesel

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Synthetic and Natural Antioxidants Used for Enhancing Oxidation Stability of Biodiesel

The oxidation stability of biodiesel is a critical factor affecting its storage and performance, necessitating the use of antioxidants to enhance its shelf life and reliability. Both natural and synthetic antioxidants have proven effective in improving the oxidation stability of biodiesel, with numerous studies demonstrating their ability to extend the induction period and delay oxidative degradation. However, while the technical efficacy of these antioxidants is well-documented, the techno-economic analysis that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of using natural versus synthetic antioxidants remains unexplored. This creates uncertainty in selecting the most sustainable and economically viable antioxidant option. This study aimed to conduct a techno-economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of synthetic and natural antioxidants in stabilizing biodiesel. The study evaluated synthetic antioxidants, specifically hydrogenated methoxy eugenol, and natural antioxidants derived from the methanolic extract of wild loquat plants, along with a comparison to commonly used synthetic antioxidants. Comprehensive simulations and modeling were conducted using Aspen Plus® V10 commercial simulation software in a block-wise manner. The technical performance was assessed by considering the quantities and qualities of biodiesel, glycerol, and antioxidants. The synthetic antioxidant processes resulted in negative net present values and longer payback periods of 11.7 to 17.8 years, while natural antioxidants showed shorter payback periods ranging from 3.8 to 12 years. Natural antioxidants, particularly those extracted from clove wastes and wild loquat plant parts, demonstrated superior techno-economic performance with the lowest operating and raw materials costs, shortest payback period, highest internal rate of return (IRR), and best profitability. Therefore, natural antioxidants are the most economically viable option for biodiesel stabilization, outperforming synthetic antioxidants in terms of operating costs, payback period, IRR, and profitability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信