基于改进的 C-E-G-T 模型的地区发电低碳合理化评估

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaobao Yu, Wenjing Zhao, Gan Song, Jialong Jin
{"title":"基于改进的 C-E-G-T 模型的地区发电低碳合理化评估","authors":"Xiaobao Yu,&nbsp;Wenjing Zhao,&nbsp;Gan Song,&nbsp;Jialong Jin","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the background of the “double carbon” goal, the green transformation of energy and power is a focus of current research. To understand the current situation and issues in the development of the power generation structure in different regions of China, an evaluation index system was constructed from four aspects: power-social system availability, power-economic system synergy, power-environmental system sustainability, and power system stability. The low carbon rationality of the power generation structure in different regions was evaluated and comprehensive evaluation scores were calculated based on an improved C-E-G-T model. The results of the study were as follows. (1) The low-carbon rationality of power generation structure is better in the western region and worse in the central region. In particular, performance was consistently good in Qinghai, Yunnan, Ningxia, and other regions and was poor in Beijing, Shanghai, and other regions. (2) To ensure the reliability of the evaluation results and a high degree of differentiation, the optimal range of values for the α parameter was (0.3, 0.7) in this paper. This research lays a theoretical foundation for the optimization of the power generation structure in all regions of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 4","pages":"2031-2044"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Rationalization of Regional Power Generation Based on an Improved C-E-G-T Model\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobao Yu,&nbsp;Wenjing Zhao,&nbsp;Gan Song,&nbsp;Jialong Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Under the background of the “double carbon” goal, the green transformation of energy and power is a focus of current research. To understand the current situation and issues in the development of the power generation structure in different regions of China, an evaluation index system was constructed from four aspects: power-social system availability, power-economic system synergy, power-environmental system sustainability, and power system stability. The low carbon rationality of the power generation structure in different regions was evaluated and comprehensive evaluation scores were calculated based on an improved C-E-G-T model. The results of the study were as follows. (1) The low-carbon rationality of power generation structure is better in the western region and worse in the central region. In particular, performance was consistently good in Qinghai, Yunnan, Ningxia, and other regions and was poor in Beijing, Shanghai, and other regions. (2) To ensure the reliability of the evaluation results and a high degree of differentiation, the optimal range of values for the α parameter was (0.3, 0.7) in this paper. This research lays a theoretical foundation for the optimization of the power generation structure in all regions of China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"2031-2044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在“双碳”目标背景下,能源和电力的绿色转型是当前研究的热点。为了解中国不同地区发电结构发展的现状和问题,从电力-社会系统可用性、电力-经济系统协同性、电力-环境系统可持续性和电力系统稳定性四个方面构建了评价指标体系。基于改进的C-E-G-T模型,对不同地区发电结构的低碳合理性进行评价,并计算综合评价分数。研究结果如下:(1)发电结构的低碳合理性西部较好,中部较差。特别是青海、云南、宁夏等地区的表现一直比较好,北京、上海等地区的表现比较差。(2)为保证评价结果的可靠性和高度的差异性,本文选取α参数的最优取值范围为(0.3,0.7)。本研究为中国各地区的发电结构优化奠定了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Rationalization of Regional Power Generation Based on an Improved C-E-G-T Model

Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Rationalization of Regional Power Generation Based on an Improved C-E-G-T Model

Under the background of the “double carbon” goal, the green transformation of energy and power is a focus of current research. To understand the current situation and issues in the development of the power generation structure in different regions of China, an evaluation index system was constructed from four aspects: power-social system availability, power-economic system synergy, power-environmental system sustainability, and power system stability. The low carbon rationality of the power generation structure in different regions was evaluated and comprehensive evaluation scores were calculated based on an improved C-E-G-T model. The results of the study were as follows. (1) The low-carbon rationality of power generation structure is better in the western region and worse in the central region. In particular, performance was consistently good in Qinghai, Yunnan, Ningxia, and other regions and was poor in Beijing, Shanghai, and other regions. (2) To ensure the reliability of the evaluation results and a high degree of differentiation, the optimal range of values for the α parameter was (0.3, 0.7) in this paper. This research lays a theoretical foundation for the optimization of the power generation structure in all regions of China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信