利用混合深度学习和机器学习模型提前一天估算每日光伏发电量

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Tuba T. Ağır
{"title":"利用混合深度学习和机器学习模型提前一天估算每日光伏发电量","authors":"Tuba T. Ağır","doi":"10.1002/ese3.1994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, hybrid LSTM-SVM and hybrid LSTM-KNN models were developed to predict hourly PV power one day ahead. The performances of these hybrid models were compared with K-nearest neighbors (KNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and support vector machine (SVM) models. The input data of these models were pressure, cloudiness, humidity, temperature, and solar intensity, while the output data was the daily photovoltaic (PV) power one day ahead. The performances of the models were evaluated using mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The prediction accuracies of hybrid LSTM-KNN, LSTM, KNN, hybrid LSTM-SVM, and SVM were 98.72%, 95.8%, 90.25%, 76.3%, and 48.87%, respectively. Hybrid LSTM-KNN predicted the daily PV power of the day ahead with higher accuracy than LSTM, KNN, SVM, and hybrid LSTM-SVM. The effect of input variables on output variables was examined with sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analyses showed that the most important meteorological data affecting the daily PV power one day ahead was solar intensity with a rate of 95%.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 4","pages":"1478-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.1994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Daily Photovoltaic Power One Day Ahead With Hybrid Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"Tuba T. Ağır\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.1994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, hybrid LSTM-SVM and hybrid LSTM-KNN models were developed to predict hourly PV power one day ahead. The performances of these hybrid models were compared with K-nearest neighbors (KNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and support vector machine (SVM) models. The input data of these models were pressure, cloudiness, humidity, temperature, and solar intensity, while the output data was the daily photovoltaic (PV) power one day ahead. The performances of the models were evaluated using mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The prediction accuracies of hybrid LSTM-KNN, LSTM, KNN, hybrid LSTM-SVM, and SVM were 98.72%, 95.8%, 90.25%, 76.3%, and 48.87%, respectively. Hybrid LSTM-KNN predicted the daily PV power of the day ahead with higher accuracy than LSTM, KNN, SVM, and hybrid LSTM-SVM. The effect of input variables on output variables was examined with sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analyses showed that the most important meteorological data affecting the daily PV power one day ahead was solar intensity with a rate of 95%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"1478-1491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.1994\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1994\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用混合LSTM-SVM和混合LSTM-KNN模型预测一天前的每小时光伏功率。将这些混合模型的性能与k近邻(KNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和支持向量机(SVM)模型进行了比较。这些模型的输入数据是气压、云量、湿度、温度和太阳强度,输出数据是一天前的每日光伏(PV)功率。采用均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)和峰值信噪比(PSNR)对模型的性能进行评价。混合LSTM-KNN、LSTM、KNN、混合LSTM-SVM和SVM的预测准确率分别为98.72%、95.8%、90.25%、76.3%和48.87%。混合LSTM-KNN预测日前日光伏功率的准确率高于LSTM、KNN、SVM和混合LSTM-SVM。用敏感性分析检验了输入变量对输出变量的影响。敏感性分析表明,对前一天光伏日发电量影响最大的气象数据是太阳强度,影响率为95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimation of Daily Photovoltaic Power One Day Ahead With Hybrid Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models

Estimation of Daily Photovoltaic Power One Day Ahead With Hybrid Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models

In this study, hybrid LSTM-SVM and hybrid LSTM-KNN models were developed to predict hourly PV power one day ahead. The performances of these hybrid models were compared with K-nearest neighbors (KNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and support vector machine (SVM) models. The input data of these models were pressure, cloudiness, humidity, temperature, and solar intensity, while the output data was the daily photovoltaic (PV) power one day ahead. The performances of the models were evaluated using mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The prediction accuracies of hybrid LSTM-KNN, LSTM, KNN, hybrid LSTM-SVM, and SVM were 98.72%, 95.8%, 90.25%, 76.3%, and 48.87%, respectively. Hybrid LSTM-KNN predicted the daily PV power of the day ahead with higher accuracy than LSTM, KNN, SVM, and hybrid LSTM-SVM. The effect of input variables on output variables was examined with sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analyses showed that the most important meteorological data affecting the daily PV power one day ahead was solar intensity with a rate of 95%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信