欧洲农业梯田的地质考古学:结构、恢复力和沉积物输送的含义

IF 1.4 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Antony G. Brown, Ben Pears, Sara Cucchiaro, Paolo Tarolli, Andreas Lang, Pengzhi Zhao, Kevin Walsh, Kristof Van Ost, Rosa-Maria Albert, Monica A. Eguiluz, Leonides Vokotopoulos, Georgia Tsartsidou, Allesandro Molinari, Anna Stagno, Sabina Ghislandi, Wei Wei, Daniel Fallu
{"title":"欧洲农业梯田的地质考古学:结构、恢复力和沉积物输送的含义","authors":"Antony G. Brown,&nbsp;Ben Pears,&nbsp;Sara Cucchiaro,&nbsp;Paolo Tarolli,&nbsp;Andreas Lang,&nbsp;Pengzhi Zhao,&nbsp;Kevin Walsh,&nbsp;Kristof Van Ost,&nbsp;Rosa-Maria Albert,&nbsp;Monica A. Eguiluz,&nbsp;Leonides Vokotopoulos,&nbsp;Georgia Tsartsidou,&nbsp;Allesandro Molinari,&nbsp;Anna Stagno,&nbsp;Sabina Ghislandi,&nbsp;Wei Wei,&nbsp;Daniel Fallu","doi":"10.1002/gea.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the primary purpose of agricultural terracing can be assumed to be food production, it has been suggested that a secondary purpose was the control of soil erosion. In this paper, we explore this thesis with multi-proxy data from the TerrACE project, which studied 20 sites in a latitudinal transect across Europe. These sites show that terrace construction was often related to previous slope instability or erosion and that terracing maintained greater soil depths than the surrounding slopes. In some cases, it seems likely that the observation of landsliding that lowered slope angles and produced an accumulation of fractured regolith may have led to opportunistic terracing. The almost universal occurrence of multiple-phase sequences revealed maintenance and re-use that protected buried soil organic carbon. Three case studies show; headwater sediment and carbon retention by terracing, how terracing could be resilient to severe regional environmental events (eruption of Thera) and, lastly, the modelling of failure and sediment supply from vineyard terraces. Although there is no doubt that terracing reduced soil loss from slopes, whether the perception of an erosion risk was part of the conscious reasons for terrace construction is far harder to ascertain, but cross-cultural awareness of these factors does seem to be likely.</p>","PeriodicalId":55117,"journal":{"name":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Geoarchaeology of Agricultural Terraces in Europe: Construction, Resilience and Implications for Sediment Delivery\",\"authors\":\"Antony G. Brown,&nbsp;Ben Pears,&nbsp;Sara Cucchiaro,&nbsp;Paolo Tarolli,&nbsp;Andreas Lang,&nbsp;Pengzhi Zhao,&nbsp;Kevin Walsh,&nbsp;Kristof Van Ost,&nbsp;Rosa-Maria Albert,&nbsp;Monica A. Eguiluz,&nbsp;Leonides Vokotopoulos,&nbsp;Georgia Tsartsidou,&nbsp;Allesandro Molinari,&nbsp;Anna Stagno,&nbsp;Sabina Ghislandi,&nbsp;Wei Wei,&nbsp;Daniel Fallu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gea.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the primary purpose of agricultural terracing can be assumed to be food production, it has been suggested that a secondary purpose was the control of soil erosion. In this paper, we explore this thesis with multi-proxy data from the TerrACE project, which studied 20 sites in a latitudinal transect across Europe. These sites show that terrace construction was often related to previous slope instability or erosion and that terracing maintained greater soil depths than the surrounding slopes. In some cases, it seems likely that the observation of landsliding that lowered slope angles and produced an accumulation of fractured regolith may have led to opportunistic terracing. The almost universal occurrence of multiple-phase sequences revealed maintenance and re-use that protected buried soil organic carbon. Three case studies show; headwater sediment and carbon retention by terracing, how terracing could be resilient to severe regional environmental events (eruption of Thera) and, lastly, the modelling of failure and sediment supply from vineyard terraces. Although there is no doubt that terracing reduced soil loss from slopes, whether the perception of an erosion risk was part of the conscious reasons for terrace construction is far harder to ascertain, but cross-cultural awareness of these factors does seem to be likely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然可以假定农业梯田的主要目的是粮食生产,但有人提出,次要目的是控制土壤侵蚀。在本文中,我们利用来自TerrACE项目的多代理数据来探讨这一观点,该项目研究了整个欧洲纬度样带的20个站点。这些遗址表明,梯田的建设通常与先前的边坡不稳定或侵蚀有关,梯田比周围的斜坡保持了更大的土壤深度。在某些情况下,观察到的滑坡降低了斜坡角度并产生了破碎的风化层的堆积,似乎可能导致了机会性梯田的形成。多相序列几乎普遍存在,揭示了埋藏土壤有机碳的维持和再利用。三个案例研究表明;梯田的源头沉积物和碳保留,梯田如何适应严重的区域环境事件(Thera火山喷发),最后,葡萄园梯田的破坏和沉积物供应模型。虽然毫无疑问梯田减少了斜坡上的土壤流失,但对侵蚀风险的感知是否是梯田建设的有意识原因的一部分却很难确定,但对这些因素的跨文化意识似乎是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Geoarchaeology of Agricultural Terraces in Europe: Construction, Resilience and Implications for Sediment Delivery

The Geoarchaeology of Agricultural Terraces in Europe: Construction, Resilience and Implications for Sediment Delivery

Although the primary purpose of agricultural terracing can be assumed to be food production, it has been suggested that a secondary purpose was the control of soil erosion. In this paper, we explore this thesis with multi-proxy data from the TerrACE project, which studied 20 sites in a latitudinal transect across Europe. These sites show that terrace construction was often related to previous slope instability or erosion and that terracing maintained greater soil depths than the surrounding slopes. In some cases, it seems likely that the observation of landsliding that lowered slope angles and produced an accumulation of fractured regolith may have led to opportunistic terracing. The almost universal occurrence of multiple-phase sequences revealed maintenance and re-use that protected buried soil organic carbon. Three case studies show; headwater sediment and carbon retention by terracing, how terracing could be resilient to severe regional environmental events (eruption of Thera) and, lastly, the modelling of failure and sediment supply from vineyard terraces. Although there is no doubt that terracing reduced soil loss from slopes, whether the perception of an erosion risk was part of the conscious reasons for terrace construction is far harder to ascertain, but cross-cultural awareness of these factors does seem to be likely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoarchaeology is an interdisciplinary journal published six times per year (in January, March, May, July, September and November). It presents the results of original research at the methodological and theoretical interface between archaeology and the geosciences and includes within its scope: interdisciplinary work focusing on understanding archaeological sites, their environmental context, and particularly site formation processes and how the analysis of sedimentary records can enhance our understanding of human activity in Quaternary environments. Manuscripts should examine the interrelationship between archaeology and the various disciplines within Quaternary science and the Earth Sciences more generally, including, for example: geology, geography, geomorphology, pedology, climatology, oceanography, geochemistry, geochronology, and geophysics. We also welcome papers that deal with the biological record of past human activity through the analysis of faunal and botanical remains and palaeoecological reconstructions that shed light on past human-environment interactions. The journal also welcomes manuscripts concerning the examination and geological context of human fossil remains as well as papers that employ analytical techniques to advance understanding of the composition and origin or material culture such as, for example, ceramics, metals, lithics, building stones, plasters, and cements. Such composition and provenance studies should be strongly grounded in their geological context through, for example, the systematic analysis of potential source materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信