大鼠骨再生诱导膜技术模型的优化与验证

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Renaud Siboni, Johan Sergheraert, Lea Thoraval, Christine Guillaume, Sophie C. Gangloff, Xavier Ohl, Julien Braux, Frédéric Velard
{"title":"大鼠骨再生诱导膜技术模型的优化与验证","authors":"Renaud Siboni,&nbsp;Johan Sergheraert,&nbsp;Lea Thoraval,&nbsp;Christine Guillaume,&nbsp;Sophie C. Gangloff,&nbsp;Xavier Ohl,&nbsp;Julien Braux,&nbsp;Frédéric Velard","doi":"10.1155/term/7357277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The induced membrane (IM) preclinical models have been described in small animals, but few studies have looked at bone regeneration achievement. The optimisation and validation of such a preclinical model, considering the results obtained after the use of biomaterials as a substitute for bone grafting, could lead to simplifying the surgical procedure and enhance the clinical results.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> An in vivo model of the IM technique was developed on the femur of Lewis rats after a 4-mm critical bone defect stabilised with an osteosynthesis plate. A first optimisation phase was performed by evaluating different osteotomy methods and two different osteosynthesis plate sizes. The efficiency of the model was evaluated by the failure rate obtained 6 weeks after the first operative time. Thereafter, bone regeneration was evaluated histologically and radiologically at 24 weeks to confirm the critical nature of the bone defect (negative control), the effectiveness of the IM with a syngeneic bone graft (positive control) and the possibility of using a biomaterial (GlassBone Noraker) in this model.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-three rats were included and underwent the first surgical step. Nineteen rats subsequently underwent the second surgical step. The results obtained led to select piezotomy as the best osteotomy technique and 1-mm-thick plates with 2.0-mm-diameter screws as osteosynthesis material. Twenty-four weeks after the second surgical step, solely the group with both surgical steps and a syngeneic bone graft showed complete ossification of the bone defect. In contrast, the group without a graft did not present a suitable ossification, which confirms the critical nature of the defect. IM produced an incomplete bone regeneration using GlassBone alone.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> A piezotome osteotomy with an osteosynthesis plate of sufficient stiffness is required for this two-stage bone regeneration model in rats. The 4-mm bone defect is critical for this model and suitable for biomaterial evaluation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/term/7357277","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation and Validation of an Induced Membrane Technique Model to Assess Bone Regeneration in Rats\",\"authors\":\"Renaud Siboni,&nbsp;Johan Sergheraert,&nbsp;Lea Thoraval,&nbsp;Christine Guillaume,&nbsp;Sophie C. Gangloff,&nbsp;Xavier Ohl,&nbsp;Julien Braux,&nbsp;Frédéric Velard\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/term/7357277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> The induced membrane (IM) preclinical models have been described in small animals, but few studies have looked at bone regeneration achievement. The optimisation and validation of such a preclinical model, considering the results obtained after the use of biomaterials as a substitute for bone grafting, could lead to simplifying the surgical procedure and enhance the clinical results.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> An in vivo model of the IM technique was developed on the femur of Lewis rats after a 4-mm critical bone defect stabilised with an osteosynthesis plate. A first optimisation phase was performed by evaluating different osteotomy methods and two different osteosynthesis plate sizes. The efficiency of the model was evaluated by the failure rate obtained 6 weeks after the first operative time. Thereafter, bone regeneration was evaluated histologically and radiologically at 24 weeks to confirm the critical nature of the bone defect (negative control), the effectiveness of the IM with a syngeneic bone graft (positive control) and the possibility of using a biomaterial (GlassBone Noraker) in this model.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-three rats were included and underwent the first surgical step. Nineteen rats subsequently underwent the second surgical step. The results obtained led to select piezotomy as the best osteotomy technique and 1-mm-thick plates with 2.0-mm-diameter screws as osteosynthesis material. Twenty-four weeks after the second surgical step, solely the group with both surgical steps and a syngeneic bone graft showed complete ossification of the bone defect. In contrast, the group without a graft did not present a suitable ossification, which confirms the critical nature of the defect. IM produced an incomplete bone regeneration using GlassBone alone.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> A piezotome osteotomy with an osteosynthesis plate of sufficient stiffness is required for this two-stage bone regeneration model in rats. The 4-mm bone defect is critical for this model and suitable for biomaterial evaluation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/term/7357277\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/term/7357277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/term/7357277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小动物诱导膜(IM)临床前模型已被描述,但很少有研究着眼于骨再生的成就。考虑到使用生物材料替代植骨后获得的结果,对这种临床前模型进行优化和验证,可以简化手术程序,提高临床效果。方法:以Lewis大鼠股骨为模型,采用骨合成板固定4mm的临界骨缺损,建立IM技术的体内模型。第一个优化阶段通过评估不同的截骨方法和两种不同的植骨钢板尺寸进行。以第一次手术后6周的失败率评价模型的有效性。随后,在24周时对骨再生进行组织学和影像学评估,以确认骨缺损的严重程度(阴性对照),IM与同源骨移植物的有效性(阳性对照)以及在该模型中使用生物材料(GlassBone Noraker)的可能性。结果:纳入63只大鼠,并进行了第一步手术。随后,19只大鼠进行了第二步手术。结果表明,最佳截骨方法是采用压骨术,植骨材料选用直径为2.0 mm的螺钉和厚度为1 mm的钢板。在第二次手术后24周,只有同时进行手术和同种骨移植的组显示骨缺损完全骨化。相比之下,没有移植的组没有出现合适的骨化,这证实了缺陷的关键性质。IM仅使用GlassBone就产生了不完全骨再生。结论:在大鼠的两阶段骨再生模型中,需要一个具有足够刚度的骨合成板的压电截骨术。4mm骨缺损对该模型至关重要,适合生物材料评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimisation and Validation of an Induced Membrane Technique Model to Assess Bone Regeneration in Rats

Optimisation and Validation of an Induced Membrane Technique Model to Assess Bone Regeneration in Rats

Background: The induced membrane (IM) preclinical models have been described in small animals, but few studies have looked at bone regeneration achievement. The optimisation and validation of such a preclinical model, considering the results obtained after the use of biomaterials as a substitute for bone grafting, could lead to simplifying the surgical procedure and enhance the clinical results.

Methods: An in vivo model of the IM technique was developed on the femur of Lewis rats after a 4-mm critical bone defect stabilised with an osteosynthesis plate. A first optimisation phase was performed by evaluating different osteotomy methods and two different osteosynthesis plate sizes. The efficiency of the model was evaluated by the failure rate obtained 6 weeks after the first operative time. Thereafter, bone regeneration was evaluated histologically and radiologically at 24 weeks to confirm the critical nature of the bone defect (negative control), the effectiveness of the IM with a syngeneic bone graft (positive control) and the possibility of using a biomaterial (GlassBone Noraker) in this model.

Results: Sixty-three rats were included and underwent the first surgical step. Nineteen rats subsequently underwent the second surgical step. The results obtained led to select piezotomy as the best osteotomy technique and 1-mm-thick plates with 2.0-mm-diameter screws as osteosynthesis material. Twenty-four weeks after the second surgical step, solely the group with both surgical steps and a syngeneic bone graft showed complete ossification of the bone defect. In contrast, the group without a graft did not present a suitable ossification, which confirms the critical nature of the defect. IM produced an incomplete bone regeneration using GlassBone alone.

Conclusions: A piezotome osteotomy with an osteosynthesis plate of sufficient stiffness is required for this two-stage bone regeneration model in rats. The 4-mm bone defect is critical for this model and suitable for biomaterial evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信