Julija A. Cubins, Samantha Wells, Gregg A. Johnson, Russ W. Gesch
{"title":"将亚麻荠纳入玉米-大豆轮作的农艺和经济权衡","authors":"Julija A. Cubins, Samantha Wells, Gregg A. Johnson, Russ W. Gesch","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] account for much of the arable land in the Upper US Midwest during the summer. Land is left fallow in late autumn after harvest through early spring leaving valuable growing degree days unused. Temporal intensification is a concept that considers planting crops such as winter camelina (<i>Camelina sativa</i> L.) during these fallow periods. Winter camelina is a freeze-hardy winter annual oilseed that can provide an economic benefit to farmers the following spring. However, there are significant agronomic and economic trade-offs associated with integrating camelina into the corn–soybean rotation. The objectives were to assess the yield potential and seed quality of a corn–camelina–soybean rotation using (1) a range of corn hybrid maturities, (2) corn stover presence or absence, and (3) calculate the economic trade-offs compared with a typical corn–soybean rotation. This study was conducted over the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons at two locations in Minnesota. Corn and soybean seed yield was maximized in treatments where camelina performed poorly and vice versa. Late corn harvest and stover presence had a negative effect on camelina establishment and yield but were favorable to soybean production. Based on both the agronomic and economic analyses for the aggregated cropping system, treatments that began with 90- and 95-day relatively mature corn hybrids performed equally well, regardless of stover presence. This indicates there are multiple options to move forward with a corn–camelina–soybean cropping rotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agronomic and economic trade-offs of integrating camelina into the corn–soybean rotation\",\"authors\":\"Julija A. Cubins, Samantha Wells, Gregg A. Johnson, Russ W. Gesch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] account for much of the arable land in the Upper US Midwest during the summer. Land is left fallow in late autumn after harvest through early spring leaving valuable growing degree days unused. Temporal intensification is a concept that considers planting crops such as winter camelina (<i>Camelina sativa</i> L.) during these fallow periods. Winter camelina is a freeze-hardy winter annual oilseed that can provide an economic benefit to farmers the following spring. However, there are significant agronomic and economic trade-offs associated with integrating camelina into the corn–soybean rotation. The objectives were to assess the yield potential and seed quality of a corn–camelina–soybean rotation using (1) a range of corn hybrid maturities, (2) corn stover presence or absence, and (3) calculate the economic trade-offs compared with a typical corn–soybean rotation. This study was conducted over the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons at two locations in Minnesota. Corn and soybean seed yield was maximized in treatments where camelina performed poorly and vice versa. Late corn harvest and stover presence had a negative effect on camelina establishment and yield but were favorable to soybean production. Based on both the agronomic and economic analyses for the aggregated cropping system, treatments that began with 90- and 95-day relatively mature corn hybrids performed equally well, regardless of stover presence. This indicates there are multiple options to move forward with a corn–camelina–soybean cropping rotation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70055\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
玉米(Zea mays L.)和大豆(Glycine max (L.))稳定。在夏季,美国中西部北部的大部分可耕地都是由这些植物造成的。在收获后的深秋到早春,土地被休耕,留下宝贵的生长期未被利用。时间强化是一个概念,考虑在这些休耕期间种植诸如冬季亚麻荠(camelina sativa L.)之类的作物。冬季亚麻荠是一种耐寒的冬季一年生油籽,可以为农民提供第二年春天的经济效益。然而,将亚麻荠纳入玉米-大豆轮作中存在着重大的农艺和经济权衡。目的是评估玉米-亚麻荠-大豆轮作的产量潜力和种子质量,使用(1)一系列玉米杂交成熟度,(2)有无玉米秸秆,以及(3)与典型玉米-大豆轮作相比计算经济权衡。这项研究是在2019年和2020年的生长季节在明尼苏达州的两个地方进行的。在亚麻荠表现较差的处理中,玉米和大豆种子产量最高,反之亦然。玉米收获晚和秸秆存在对亚麻荠建立和产量有不利影响,但对大豆生产有利。根据综合种植制度的农艺和经济分析,无论秸秆是否存在,以90天和95天相对成熟的玉米杂交品种开始的处理效果同样好。这表明推进玉米-亚麻荠-大豆轮作有多种选择。
Agronomic and economic trade-offs of integrating camelina into the corn–soybean rotation
Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] account for much of the arable land in the Upper US Midwest during the summer. Land is left fallow in late autumn after harvest through early spring leaving valuable growing degree days unused. Temporal intensification is a concept that considers planting crops such as winter camelina (Camelina sativa L.) during these fallow periods. Winter camelina is a freeze-hardy winter annual oilseed that can provide an economic benefit to farmers the following spring. However, there are significant agronomic and economic trade-offs associated with integrating camelina into the corn–soybean rotation. The objectives were to assess the yield potential and seed quality of a corn–camelina–soybean rotation using (1) a range of corn hybrid maturities, (2) corn stover presence or absence, and (3) calculate the economic trade-offs compared with a typical corn–soybean rotation. This study was conducted over the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons at two locations in Minnesota. Corn and soybean seed yield was maximized in treatments where camelina performed poorly and vice versa. Late corn harvest and stover presence had a negative effect on camelina establishment and yield but were favorable to soybean production. Based on both the agronomic and economic analyses for the aggregated cropping system, treatments that began with 90- and 95-day relatively mature corn hybrids performed equally well, regardless of stover presence. This indicates there are multiple options to move forward with a corn–camelina–soybean cropping rotation.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.