“规模依赖”的环境规制与空间劳动力配置

IF 5.5 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
ShiYi Chen , EnDong Liang , ChaoLiang Liu
{"title":"“规模依赖”的环境规制与空间劳动力配置","authors":"ShiYi Chen ,&nbsp;EnDong Liang ,&nbsp;ChaoLiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rich evidence shows that the large and more developed cities in China (as in many other countries) enforce stricter environmental regulations. On one hand, stringent regulations have negative impacts on the local labor market, leading to labor outflow into small cities with lower productivity and “dirtier” industrial structure. On the other hand, better environment quality (as a result of the regulations) is also an attraction for domestic immigrants. This paper is the first to use a quantitative spatial model to study the consequences of spatially “size-dependent” urban environmental policies. We find that higher aggregate productivity and fewer total emissions can be simultaneously achieved by reducing the existing “size-dependent” variation of environmental regulations in China. Moreover, to meet a given overall abatement target, urging the largest cities to further tighten the regulations may do the most damage to the economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Size-dependent” environmental regulations and spatial labor allocation\",\"authors\":\"ShiYi Chen ,&nbsp;EnDong Liang ,&nbsp;ChaoLiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rich evidence shows that the large and more developed cities in China (as in many other countries) enforce stricter environmental regulations. On one hand, stringent regulations have negative impacts on the local labor market, leading to labor outflow into small cities with lower productivity and “dirtier” industrial structure. On the other hand, better environment quality (as a result of the regulations) is also an attraction for domestic immigrants. This paper is the first to use a quantitative spatial model to study the consequences of spatially “size-dependent” urban environmental policies. We find that higher aggregate productivity and fewer total emissions can be simultaneously achieved by reducing the existing “size-dependent” variation of environmental regulations in China. Moreover, to meet a given overall abatement target, urging the largest cities to further tighten the regulations may do the most damage to the economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000427\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丰富的证据表明,中国(与许多其他国家一样)的大城市和较发达城市实施了更严格的环境法规。一方面,严格的法规会对当地劳动力市场产生负面影响,导致劳动力流向生产率较低、产业结构 "更脏 "的小城市。另一方面,较好的环境质量(法规的结果)也会吸引国内移民。本文首次使用定量空间模型来研究 "规模依赖型 "城市环境政策的后果。我们发现,通过减少中国现有的 "规模依赖型 "环境法规差异,可以同时实现更高的总体生产率和更少的排放总量。此外,为了实现给定的总体减排目标,敦促最大的城市进一步收紧法规可能会对经济造成最大的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Size-dependent” environmental regulations and spatial labor allocation
Rich evidence shows that the large and more developed cities in China (as in many other countries) enforce stricter environmental regulations. On one hand, stringent regulations have negative impacts on the local labor market, leading to labor outflow into small cities with lower productivity and “dirtier” industrial structure. On the other hand, better environment quality (as a result of the regulations) is also an attraction for domestic immigrants. This paper is the first to use a quantitative spatial model to study the consequences of spatially “size-dependent” urban environmental policies. We find that higher aggregate productivity and fewer total emissions can be simultaneously achieved by reducing the existing “size-dependent” variation of environmental regulations in China. Moreover, to meet a given overall abatement target, urging the largest cities to further tighten the regulations may do the most damage to the economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信