利用可解释的强迫融合改进可微分水文模型

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Kamlesh Sawadekar , Yalan Song , Ming Pan , Hylke Beck , Rachel McCrary , Paul Ullrich , Kathryn Lawson , Chaopeng Shen
{"title":"利用可解释的强迫融合改进可微分水文模型","authors":"Kamlesh Sawadekar ,&nbsp;Yalan Song ,&nbsp;Ming Pan ,&nbsp;Hylke Beck ,&nbsp;Rachel McCrary ,&nbsp;Paul Ullrich ,&nbsp;Kathryn Lawson ,&nbsp;Chaopeng Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atmospheric forcings for hydrologic models often contain significant errors, but traditional modifications only employ bias correction or distributional transformations based on rainfall measurements. Deep learning could fuse multiple datasets for improved hydrologic modeling, but is difficult to interpret. Here we introduce a “differentiable” data fusion framework where a neural network is pre-trained to provide parameters a process-based hydrologic model while a second network is trained to weigh multiple forcings (Daymet, NLDAS, and Maurer) for a fused precipitation input to the combined model. The fused precipitation data greatly improved streamflow simulation performance (both low flow and high flow, but especially high flow). Applying adaptive weights to a single forcing did not yield improvements. Overall, the fusion placed a higher weight on Daymet, and slightly lower weights on NLDAS and Maurer. NLDAS’s weights increased in the humid eastern US while Maurer’s increased in mountainous regions. The fused precipitation had similar means and large-magnitude event performance to Daymet. However, it exhibited higher correlation with station-based precipitation than any individual forcing or their simple average, and had close to the smallest bias for large storms. Pre-training the parameterization network based on the best-performing single forcing (Daymet) yielded better results than those based on the average of forcings. Overall, the differentiable hydrologic model offers a generic hydrology-informed fusion method to improve streamflow prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"659 ","pages":"Article 133320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving differentiable hydrologic modeling with interpretable forcing fusion\",\"authors\":\"Kamlesh Sawadekar ,&nbsp;Yalan Song ,&nbsp;Ming Pan ,&nbsp;Hylke Beck ,&nbsp;Rachel McCrary ,&nbsp;Paul Ullrich ,&nbsp;Kathryn Lawson ,&nbsp;Chaopeng Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Atmospheric forcings for hydrologic models often contain significant errors, but traditional modifications only employ bias correction or distributional transformations based on rainfall measurements. Deep learning could fuse multiple datasets for improved hydrologic modeling, but is difficult to interpret. Here we introduce a “differentiable” data fusion framework where a neural network is pre-trained to provide parameters a process-based hydrologic model while a second network is trained to weigh multiple forcings (Daymet, NLDAS, and Maurer) for a fused precipitation input to the combined model. The fused precipitation data greatly improved streamflow simulation performance (both low flow and high flow, but especially high flow). Applying adaptive weights to a single forcing did not yield improvements. Overall, the fusion placed a higher weight on Daymet, and slightly lower weights on NLDAS and Maurer. NLDAS’s weights increased in the humid eastern US while Maurer’s increased in mountainous regions. The fused precipitation had similar means and large-magnitude event performance to Daymet. However, it exhibited higher correlation with station-based precipitation than any individual forcing or their simple average, and had close to the smallest bias for large storms. Pre-training the parameterization network based on the best-performing single forcing (Daymet) yielded better results than those based on the average of forcings. Overall, the differentiable hydrologic model offers a generic hydrology-informed fusion method to improve streamflow prediction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"659 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425006584\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425006584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水文模式的大气强迫通常包含显著的误差,但传统的修正只采用偏差校正或基于降雨量测量的分布转换。深度学习可以融合多个数据集来改进水文建模,但很难解释。在这里,我们引入了一个“可微”数据融合框架,其中一个神经网络被预先训练以提供基于过程的水文模型参数,而另一个网络被训练以权衡多个强迫(Daymet、NLDAS和Maurer),以将融合的降水输入到组合模型中。融合后的降水数据极大地提高了径流模拟性能(无论是小流量还是大流量,尤其是大流量)。将自适应权重应用于单一强迫并没有产生改进。总的来说,融合对Daymet的权重更高,对NLDAS和Maurer的权重略低。NLDAS的权重在美国潮湿的东部地区增加,而Maurer的权重在山区增加。融合降水具有与Daymet相似的均值和大量级事件表现。然而,它与站基降水的相关性高于任何单个强迫或它们的简单平均值,并且对大风暴的偏差接近最小。基于最佳单一强迫(Daymet)的参数化网络的预训练效果优于基于强迫平均值的预训练。总的来说,可微水文模型提供了一种通用的水文信息融合方法,以改善径流预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving differentiable hydrologic modeling with interpretable forcing fusion
Atmospheric forcings for hydrologic models often contain significant errors, but traditional modifications only employ bias correction or distributional transformations based on rainfall measurements. Deep learning could fuse multiple datasets for improved hydrologic modeling, but is difficult to interpret. Here we introduce a “differentiable” data fusion framework where a neural network is pre-trained to provide parameters a process-based hydrologic model while a second network is trained to weigh multiple forcings (Daymet, NLDAS, and Maurer) for a fused precipitation input to the combined model. The fused precipitation data greatly improved streamflow simulation performance (both low flow and high flow, but especially high flow). Applying adaptive weights to a single forcing did not yield improvements. Overall, the fusion placed a higher weight on Daymet, and slightly lower weights on NLDAS and Maurer. NLDAS’s weights increased in the humid eastern US while Maurer’s increased in mountainous regions. The fused precipitation had similar means and large-magnitude event performance to Daymet. However, it exhibited higher correlation with station-based precipitation than any individual forcing or their simple average, and had close to the smallest bias for large storms. Pre-training the parameterization network based on the best-performing single forcing (Daymet) yielded better results than those based on the average of forcings. Overall, the differentiable hydrologic model offers a generic hydrology-informed fusion method to improve streamflow prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信