Michael S. Williams , Eric D. Ebel , Kis Robertson-Hale , Sheryl L. Shaw , Bonnie W. Kissler
{"title":"美国屠宰场内和屠宰场之间肉鸡沙门氏菌血清型的差异","authors":"Michael S. Williams , Eric D. Ebel , Kis Robertson-Hale , Sheryl L. Shaw , Bonnie W. Kissler","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are more than 2500 serotypes of <em>Salmonella enterica</em>. One interesting feature of this bacterium is that regardless of whether samples are collected from food commodities, a single animal species, humans, or a specific environmental setting, only about 5 serotypes constitute 50% or more of all positive samples. Another interesting feature of <em>Salmonella</em> is that the most common serotypes are not consistent across time or broad geographic region. Examples of this phenomenon are that <em>Salmonella</em> Heidelberg was the third most common serotype found in United States human illness cases in 1996, but the 53rd most common serotype in 2022. An example of serotype-specific spatial clustering is the occurrence of <em>Salmonella</em> Weltevreden predominantly in continental Southeast Asia. Clustering in space and time presents opportunities to control more pathogenic serotypes. In this study, data from a seven-month survey of broiler chicken carcass production in the United States are used to assess how the occurrence of the dominant serotypes changes as carcasses move through the production process. Samples were collected at rehang and postchill, with the number of positive samples at each location being 2909 and 233, respectively. Different intervention strategies may impact specific serotypes differently. Additional analyses demonstrate how serotypes are clustered (or not) as a function of production volume and corporate ownership. Understanding how the occurrence of serotypes varies across the industry can provide insights into factors that lead to the clustering of specific serotypes and has the potential to help identify intervention strategies that effectively reduce the risk of human salmonellosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 6","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Salmonella Serotypes in Broiler Chickens Within and Between Slaughter Establishments in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Williams , Eric D. Ebel , Kis Robertson-Hale , Sheryl L. Shaw , Bonnie W. Kissler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There are more than 2500 serotypes of <em>Salmonella enterica</em>. One interesting feature of this bacterium is that regardless of whether samples are collected from food commodities, a single animal species, humans, or a specific environmental setting, only about 5 serotypes constitute 50% or more of all positive samples. Another interesting feature of <em>Salmonella</em> is that the most common serotypes are not consistent across time or broad geographic region. Examples of this phenomenon are that <em>Salmonella</em> Heidelberg was the third most common serotype found in United States human illness cases in 1996, but the 53rd most common serotype in 2022. An example of serotype-specific spatial clustering is the occurrence of <em>Salmonella</em> Weltevreden predominantly in continental Southeast Asia. Clustering in space and time presents opportunities to control more pathogenic serotypes. In this study, data from a seven-month survey of broiler chicken carcass production in the United States are used to assess how the occurrence of the dominant serotypes changes as carcasses move through the production process. Samples were collected at rehang and postchill, with the number of positive samples at each location being 2909 and 233, respectively. Different intervention strategies may impact specific serotypes differently. Additional analyses demonstrate how serotypes are clustered (or not) as a function of production volume and corporate ownership. Understanding how the occurrence of serotypes varies across the industry can provide insights into factors that lead to the clustering of specific serotypes and has the potential to help identify intervention strategies that effectively reduce the risk of human salmonellosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in Salmonella Serotypes in Broiler Chickens Within and Between Slaughter Establishments in the United States
There are more than 2500 serotypes of Salmonella enterica. One interesting feature of this bacterium is that regardless of whether samples are collected from food commodities, a single animal species, humans, or a specific environmental setting, only about 5 serotypes constitute 50% or more of all positive samples. Another interesting feature of Salmonella is that the most common serotypes are not consistent across time or broad geographic region. Examples of this phenomenon are that Salmonella Heidelberg was the third most common serotype found in United States human illness cases in 1996, but the 53rd most common serotype in 2022. An example of serotype-specific spatial clustering is the occurrence of Salmonella Weltevreden predominantly in continental Southeast Asia. Clustering in space and time presents opportunities to control more pathogenic serotypes. In this study, data from a seven-month survey of broiler chicken carcass production in the United States are used to assess how the occurrence of the dominant serotypes changes as carcasses move through the production process. Samples were collected at rehang and postchill, with the number of positive samples at each location being 2909 and 233, respectively. Different intervention strategies may impact specific serotypes differently. Additional analyses demonstrate how serotypes are clustered (or not) as a function of production volume and corporate ownership. Understanding how the occurrence of serotypes varies across the industry can provide insights into factors that lead to the clustering of specific serotypes and has the potential to help identify intervention strategies that effectively reduce the risk of human salmonellosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.