Shishir Damani, Eric Totten, Humza Butt, Bhavika Sharma, William J. Devenport, K. Todd Lowe
{"title":"光滑和粗糙墙面上的次对流压力波动比较","authors":"Shishir Damani, Eric Totten, Humza Butt, Bhavika Sharma, William J. Devenport, K. Todd Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sub-convective wall pressure fluctuations are compared for a smooth and rough surface with homogeneously distributed roughness elements. Limitations in measurement techniques make it challenging to measure the sub-convective pressure spectrum over smooth surfaces, and there are no general techniques for rough walls. The study presented here uses a recently developed approach to accurately measure the sub-convective pressure fluctuations, particularly at low-wavenumbers for a single flow condition for two surfaces. Correlations between different sensors suggest smaller scales in rough walls than in smooth walls. A significant expansion of the convective ridge is noticed. Normalizations of the wavenumber-frequency spectrum as <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>ϕ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup><mo>,</mo><mi>ω</mi><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> shows a near-exact collapse at the convective peak. The normalized spectral levels show a difference of about 25 dB in the sub-convective domain due to rough wall convective ridge behavior. The absolute sub-convective pressure spectrum levels relative to 20 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>Pa are about 30 dB below the convective pressure fluctuations for smooth walls. Rough wall measurements show absolute levels 15–20 dB higher than the smooth wall. A wavenumber-white behavior is observed at higher frequencies for smooth and rough walls. Both smooth and rough walls show a convection velocity dependent on frequency. The rough wall convective ridge width shows a frequency dependency, whereas the smooth wall convective ridge width collapses at all frequencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 109835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of sub-convective pressure fluctuations over a smooth and rough wall\",\"authors\":\"Shishir Damani, Eric Totten, Humza Butt, Bhavika Sharma, William J. Devenport, K. Todd Lowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sub-convective wall pressure fluctuations are compared for a smooth and rough surface with homogeneously distributed roughness elements. Limitations in measurement techniques make it challenging to measure the sub-convective pressure spectrum over smooth surfaces, and there are no general techniques for rough walls. The study presented here uses a recently developed approach to accurately measure the sub-convective pressure fluctuations, particularly at low-wavenumbers for a single flow condition for two surfaces. Correlations between different sensors suggest smaller scales in rough walls than in smooth walls. A significant expansion of the convective ridge is noticed. Normalizations of the wavenumber-frequency spectrum as <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>ϕ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup><mo>,</mo><mi>ω</mi><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup><msup><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> shows a near-exact collapse at the convective peak. The normalized spectral levels show a difference of about 25 dB in the sub-convective domain due to rough wall convective ridge behavior. The absolute sub-convective pressure spectrum levels relative to 20 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>Pa are about 30 dB below the convective pressure fluctuations for smooth walls. Rough wall measurements show absolute levels 15–20 dB higher than the smooth wall. A wavenumber-white behavior is observed at higher frequencies for smooth and rough walls. Both smooth and rough walls show a convection velocity dependent on frequency. The rough wall convective ridge width shows a frequency dependency, whereas the smooth wall convective ridge width collapses at all frequencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25000931\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25000931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of sub-convective pressure fluctuations over a smooth and rough wall
Sub-convective wall pressure fluctuations are compared for a smooth and rough surface with homogeneously distributed roughness elements. Limitations in measurement techniques make it challenging to measure the sub-convective pressure spectrum over smooth surfaces, and there are no general techniques for rough walls. The study presented here uses a recently developed approach to accurately measure the sub-convective pressure fluctuations, particularly at low-wavenumbers for a single flow condition for two surfaces. Correlations between different sensors suggest smaller scales in rough walls than in smooth walls. A significant expansion of the convective ridge is noticed. Normalizations of the wavenumber-frequency spectrum as shows a near-exact collapse at the convective peak. The normalized spectral levels show a difference of about 25 dB in the sub-convective domain due to rough wall convective ridge behavior. The absolute sub-convective pressure spectrum levels relative to 20 Pa are about 30 dB below the convective pressure fluctuations for smooth walls. Rough wall measurements show absolute levels 15–20 dB higher than the smooth wall. A wavenumber-white behavior is observed at higher frequencies for smooth and rough walls. Both smooth and rough walls show a convection velocity dependent on frequency. The rough wall convective ridge width shows a frequency dependency, whereas the smooth wall convective ridge width collapses at all frequencies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of convective heat transfer and fluid dynamics relevant to engineering or the environment, including multiphase and microscale flows.
Papers reporting the application of these disciplines to design and development, with emphasis on new technological fields, are also welcomed. Some of these new fields include microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.