{"title":"早产儿视网膜病变筛查的SCREENROP标准的验证:一个加拿大模型的考虑。","authors":"Felicia Tai,Yasmin Jindani,Amit Mukerji,Kourosh Sabri","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nReducing unnecessary retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screenings in neonates is important for minimizing morbidity associated with such examinations including pain for the child, anxiety in parents, and conserving healthcare resources. The Seminal Canadian Recommendations for Evidence-Based Examination of Neonates for Retinopathy of Prematurity (SCREEN-ROP) guidelines recommend only screening babies with birth weight (BW) <1200g or gestational age (GA) <30 weeks to prevent unnecessary screenings. This study aims to retrospectively test the sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP in a large urban Canadian setting for capturing babies requiring treatment for ROP.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nRetrospective accuracy analysis of revised diagnostic testing criteria.\r\n\r\nPARTICIPANTS\r\nAll babies born at McMaster Children Hospital from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 who: 1) received at least one ROP eye exam, or 2) received ROP treatment, were included.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nBirth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) at birth were collected from Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) and BORN Ontario, which stores all information on babies admitted to level 3 and level 2 Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), respectively. SCREEN-ROP criteria were applied to the cohort. Institutional ethics approval was obtained from Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (REB #13216-C) and CNN (REB #04-062).\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nSensitivity and specificity of the model was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Chi-squared test was used to compare the babies captured with SCREEN-ROP criteria versus prior criteria (GA <31 weeks or birth weight <1251g).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n823 unique babies were screened from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 of which 79 unique babies were treated for ROP. Applying the SCREEN-ROP criteria captured all 79 babies requiring ROP treatment while avoiding another 61 babies (7.41%) from being unnecessarily enrolled into ROP screening. Sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP criteria for capturing babies requiring ROP treatment was 100% (95% CI: 95.44% to 100%), and the specificity was 8.20% (95% CI: 6.33% to 10.41%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBy screening babies with BW <1200g or GA <30 weeks, 7.41% of babies would have been saved from unnecessary ROP screenings, and all babies requiring ROP treatment would have been captured with 100% sensitivity. Further validation in other large centers and countries may allow for broader implementation of SCREEN-ROP guidelines.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the SCREENROP Criteria for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening: A Canadian Model for Consideration.\",\"authors\":\"Felicia Tai,Yasmin Jindani,Amit Mukerji,Kourosh Sabri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nReducing unnecessary retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screenings in neonates is important for minimizing morbidity associated with such examinations including pain for the child, anxiety in parents, and conserving healthcare resources. The Seminal Canadian Recommendations for Evidence-Based Examination of Neonates for Retinopathy of Prematurity (SCREEN-ROP) guidelines recommend only screening babies with birth weight (BW) <1200g or gestational age (GA) <30 weeks to prevent unnecessary screenings. This study aims to retrospectively test the sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP in a large urban Canadian setting for capturing babies requiring treatment for ROP.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nRetrospective accuracy analysis of revised diagnostic testing criteria.\\r\\n\\r\\nPARTICIPANTS\\r\\nAll babies born at McMaster Children Hospital from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 who: 1) received at least one ROP eye exam, or 2) received ROP treatment, were included.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nBirth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) at birth were collected from Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) and BORN Ontario, which stores all information on babies admitted to level 3 and level 2 Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), respectively. SCREEN-ROP criteria were applied to the cohort. Institutional ethics approval was obtained from Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (REB #13216-C) and CNN (REB #04-062).\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\r\\nSensitivity and specificity of the model was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Chi-squared test was used to compare the babies captured with SCREEN-ROP criteria versus prior criteria (GA <31 weeks or birth weight <1251g).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n823 unique babies were screened from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 of which 79 unique babies were treated for ROP. Applying the SCREEN-ROP criteria captured all 79 babies requiring ROP treatment while avoiding another 61 babies (7.41%) from being unnecessarily enrolled into ROP screening. Sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP criteria for capturing babies requiring ROP treatment was 100% (95% CI: 95.44% to 100%), and the specificity was 8.20% (95% CI: 6.33% to 10.41%).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nBy screening babies with BW <1200g or GA <30 weeks, 7.41% of babies would have been saved from unnecessary ROP screenings, and all babies requiring ROP treatment would have been captured with 100% sensitivity. Further validation in other large centers and countries may allow for broader implementation of SCREEN-ROP guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the SCREENROP Criteria for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening: A Canadian Model for Consideration.
OBJECTIVE
Reducing unnecessary retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screenings in neonates is important for minimizing morbidity associated with such examinations including pain for the child, anxiety in parents, and conserving healthcare resources. The Seminal Canadian Recommendations for Evidence-Based Examination of Neonates for Retinopathy of Prematurity (SCREEN-ROP) guidelines recommend only screening babies with birth weight (BW) <1200g or gestational age (GA) <30 weeks to prevent unnecessary screenings. This study aims to retrospectively test the sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP in a large urban Canadian setting for capturing babies requiring treatment for ROP.
DESIGN
Retrospective accuracy analysis of revised diagnostic testing criteria.
PARTICIPANTS
All babies born at McMaster Children Hospital from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 who: 1) received at least one ROP eye exam, or 2) received ROP treatment, were included.
METHODS
Birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) at birth were collected from Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) and BORN Ontario, which stores all information on babies admitted to level 3 and level 2 Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), respectively. SCREEN-ROP criteria were applied to the cohort. Institutional ethics approval was obtained from Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (REB #13216-C) and CNN (REB #04-062).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Sensitivity and specificity of the model was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Chi-squared test was used to compare the babies captured with SCREEN-ROP criteria versus prior criteria (GA <31 weeks or birth weight <1251g).
RESULTS
823 unique babies were screened from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 of which 79 unique babies were treated for ROP. Applying the SCREEN-ROP criteria captured all 79 babies requiring ROP treatment while avoiding another 61 babies (7.41%) from being unnecessarily enrolled into ROP screening. Sensitivity of SCREEN-ROP criteria for capturing babies requiring ROP treatment was 100% (95% CI: 95.44% to 100%), and the specificity was 8.20% (95% CI: 6.33% to 10.41%).
CONCLUSIONS
By screening babies with BW <1200g or GA <30 weeks, 7.41% of babies would have been saved from unnecessary ROP screenings, and all babies requiring ROP treatment would have been captured with 100% sensitivity. Further validation in other large centers and countries may allow for broader implementation of SCREEN-ROP guidelines.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.