{"title":"碳拔河:在排放与汇之争中评估东江滨水区碳中和潜力","authors":"Mengni Zhang, Pingting Hu, Jingxian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban waterfronts occupy a pivotal position in the “carbon tug-of-war”, balancing the dual challenges of rising carbon emissions and declining sink capacities. This study investigates the Dongjiang waterfront in Dongguan City to assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon sources and sinks, employing the PLES (Production-Living-Ecological Spaces) framework, the STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology)<!--> <!-->model, grey relational analysis (GRA) method, and the GM (1,1) (Grey Model First-Order One-Variable) model. The findings reveal three key insights: (1) Shifting balance in the carbon struggle: From 2000 to 2022, carbon sink capacity declined by 47.6 %, while total emissions rose to 1.17 million tons, with per capita emissions reaching 5.30 tons, highlighting an increasing imbalance in the emissions-sink competition; (2) Nonlinear carbon sink dynamics: Contrary to a gradual decline, carbon sinks—particularly aquatic ecosystems—exhibit abrupt tipping points due to urbanization and industrial expansion. After an initial sharp drop, sink capacity temporarily stabilized before entering a phase of accelerated deterioration, reflecting intensifying ecological stress in the emissions-sinks battle; and (3) Spatial disparities & emission drivers: A significant proportion of emissions originates from urban-industrial areas, while rural areas contribute minimally to carbon sink. Key emission drivers include urbanization (+1.402 %), energy consumption (+0.095 %), and population density (+0.201 %), whereas waterfront ecological space helps mitigate emissions (−0.147 %). To address these multifaceted challenges, the study proposes the 5R framework—Reduction, Reuse, Recycling, Rethink, and Repair, integrating emissions reduction with ecological restoration as a strategy for sustainable waterfront development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113481"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon tug-of-war: Assessing Dongjiang waterfront’s carbon neutrality potential in the battle between emissions and sinks\",\"authors\":\"Mengni Zhang, Pingting Hu, Jingxian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban waterfronts occupy a pivotal position in the “carbon tug-of-war”, balancing the dual challenges of rising carbon emissions and declining sink capacities. This study investigates the Dongjiang waterfront in Dongguan City to assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon sources and sinks, employing the PLES (Production-Living-Ecological Spaces) framework, the STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology)<!--> <!-->model, grey relational analysis (GRA) method, and the GM (1,1) (Grey Model First-Order One-Variable) model. The findings reveal three key insights: (1) Shifting balance in the carbon struggle: From 2000 to 2022, carbon sink capacity declined by 47.6 %, while total emissions rose to 1.17 million tons, with per capita emissions reaching 5.30 tons, highlighting an increasing imbalance in the emissions-sink competition; (2) Nonlinear carbon sink dynamics: Contrary to a gradual decline, carbon sinks—particularly aquatic ecosystems—exhibit abrupt tipping points due to urbanization and industrial expansion. After an initial sharp drop, sink capacity temporarily stabilized before entering a phase of accelerated deterioration, reflecting intensifying ecological stress in the emissions-sinks battle; and (3) Spatial disparities & emission drivers: A significant proportion of emissions originates from urban-industrial areas, while rural areas contribute minimally to carbon sink. Key emission drivers include urbanization (+1.402 %), energy consumption (+0.095 %), and population density (+0.201 %), whereas waterfront ecological space helps mitigate emissions (−0.147 %). To address these multifaceted challenges, the study proposes the 5R framework—Reduction, Reuse, Recycling, Rethink, and Repair, integrating emissions reduction with ecological restoration as a strategy for sustainable waterfront development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500411X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500411X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The carbon tug-of-war: Assessing Dongjiang waterfront’s carbon neutrality potential in the battle between emissions and sinks
Urban waterfronts occupy a pivotal position in the “carbon tug-of-war”, balancing the dual challenges of rising carbon emissions and declining sink capacities. This study investigates the Dongjiang waterfront in Dongguan City to assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon sources and sinks, employing the PLES (Production-Living-Ecological Spaces) framework, the STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology) model, grey relational analysis (GRA) method, and the GM (1,1) (Grey Model First-Order One-Variable) model. The findings reveal three key insights: (1) Shifting balance in the carbon struggle: From 2000 to 2022, carbon sink capacity declined by 47.6 %, while total emissions rose to 1.17 million tons, with per capita emissions reaching 5.30 tons, highlighting an increasing imbalance in the emissions-sink competition; (2) Nonlinear carbon sink dynamics: Contrary to a gradual decline, carbon sinks—particularly aquatic ecosystems—exhibit abrupt tipping points due to urbanization and industrial expansion. After an initial sharp drop, sink capacity temporarily stabilized before entering a phase of accelerated deterioration, reflecting intensifying ecological stress in the emissions-sinks battle; and (3) Spatial disparities & emission drivers: A significant proportion of emissions originates from urban-industrial areas, while rural areas contribute minimally to carbon sink. Key emission drivers include urbanization (+1.402 %), energy consumption (+0.095 %), and population density (+0.201 %), whereas waterfront ecological space helps mitigate emissions (−0.147 %). To address these multifaceted challenges, the study proposes the 5R framework—Reduction, Reuse, Recycling, Rethink, and Repair, integrating emissions reduction with ecological restoration as a strategy for sustainable waterfront development.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.