在东南亚大陆,农田对生态土地的侵占导致大量的碳排放

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Danni Su , Kun Yang , Zongqi Peng , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Xiaofang Yang , Lusha Ma , Jingcong Ma
{"title":"在东南亚大陆,农田对生态土地的侵占导致大量的碳排放","authors":"Danni Su ,&nbsp;Kun Yang ,&nbsp;Zongqi Peng ,&nbsp;Run Sun ,&nbsp;Mingfeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Yang ,&nbsp;Lusha Ma ,&nbsp;Jingcong Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&amp;C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 10<sup>8</sup> t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&amp;C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 15.73 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 14.81 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from E&amp;C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, offsetting 5.79 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 0.78 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, leading to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 5.83 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 2.87 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113505"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cropland encroachment on ecological land in Mainland Southeast Asia leads to massive carbon emissions\",\"authors\":\"Danni Su ,&nbsp;Kun Yang ,&nbsp;Zongqi Peng ,&nbsp;Run Sun ,&nbsp;Mingfeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Yang ,&nbsp;Lusha Ma ,&nbsp;Jingcong Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&amp;C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 10<sup>8</sup> t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&amp;C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 15.73 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 14.81 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from E&amp;C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, offsetting 5.79 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 0.78 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, leading to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 5.83 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 2.87 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东南亚大陆(MSEA)对全球碳循环至关重要。在人口和经济增长中平衡耕地扩张和生态土地保护是当务之急。利用1992 - 2022年的PLUS模型,模拟了SSP1-RCP2.6、SSP2-RCP4.5和SSP5-RCP8.5下MSEA的土地利用格局。基于历史和未来土地利用数据以及各类土地利用类型的碳密度数据,采用碳储量损失法分析了耕地对生态用地(E&;C)的侵蚀及其碳排放的时空变化。结果表明:30多年来,耕地蚕食了MSEA生态用地100413.27 km2,造成的CO2排放量为27.44 × 108 t,占同期MSEA温室气体排放总量(数据来源:Our World in data)的17.46%。其中,缅甸和越南是主要捐助国。以2012年为节点,将MSEA的E&;C分为前期(1992-2012)和后期(2012 - 2022)。前期生态用地被侵占57,253.86 km2,造成碳储量损失4.29 × 108t,二氧化碳排放量15.73 × 108t。耕地蚕食生态用地54549.09 km2,造成碳储量损失4.03 × 108t,二氧化碳排放量14.81 × 108t。E&;C在前期和后期的CO2排放量分别占温室气体排放总量的19.01%和18.44%。碳储量损失最大的是森林和灌丛。在SSP1-RCP2.6下,退耕还林增加了1.58 × 108t的碳储量,抵消了5.79 × 108t的CO2排放。而在SSP2-RCP4.5和SSP5-RCP8.5下,碳储量分别减少1.59 × 108t和0.78 × 108t,导致CO2排放量分别减少5.83 × 108t和2.87 × 108t。东南亚国家应采用SSP1-RCP2.6,管理耕地扩张,平衡经济发展与生态保护,加强应对气候变化国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cropland encroachment on ecological land in Mainland Southeast Asia leads to massive carbon emissions
Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km2 of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 108 t of CO2 emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km2 of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 108t and 15.73 × 108t of CO2 emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km2 of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 108t and 14.81 × 108t of CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions from E&C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 108t, offsetting 5.79 × 108t of CO2 emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 108t and 0.78 × 108t, leading to CO2 emissions of 5.83 × 108t and 2.87 × 108t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信