Danni Su , Kun Yang , Zongqi Peng , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Xiaofang Yang , Lusha Ma , Jingcong Ma
{"title":"在东南亚大陆,农田对生态土地的侵占导致大量的碳排放","authors":"Danni Su , Kun Yang , Zongqi Peng , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Xiaofang Yang , Lusha Ma , Jingcong Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 10<sup>8</sup> t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 15.73 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 14.81 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from E&C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, offsetting 5.79 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 0.78 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, leading to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 5.83 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 2.87 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113505"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cropland encroachment on ecological land in Mainland Southeast Asia leads to massive carbon emissions\",\"authors\":\"Danni Su , Kun Yang , Zongqi Peng , Run Sun , Mingfeng Zhang , Xiaofang Yang , Lusha Ma , Jingcong Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 10<sup>8</sup> t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 15.73 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km<sup>2</sup> of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 14.81 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from E&C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, offsetting 5.79 × 10<sup>8</sup>t of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 0.78 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, leading to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 5.83 × 10<sup>8</sup>t and 2.87 × 10<sup>8</sup>t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cropland encroachment on ecological land in Mainland Southeast Asia leads to massive carbon emissions
Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) is essential to the global carbon cycle. Balancing cropland expansion and ecological land protection amid population and economic growth is urgent. This study simulated MSEA’s land use patterns under SSP1-RCP2.6, SSP2-RCP4.5, and SSP5-RCP8.5 using the PLUS model with data from 1992 to 2022. Based on historical and future land use data and carbon density data for each land use type, the spatial and temporal changes in the encroachment of cropland on ecological land (E&C) and the resulting carbon emissions were analysed using the carbon stock loss method. The results showed that cropland encroached on 100,413.27 km2 of ecological land in MSEA over 30 years, causing 27.44 × 108 t of CO2 emissions, which accounts for 17.46 % of the total greenhouse gas emissions (data source: Our World in Data) in MSEA during the same period. Among these, Myanmar and Vietnam are the main contributing countries. Taking 2012 as the node, the E&C in MSEA is categorised into the early stage (1992–2012) and the late stage (2012–2022). Earlier, 57,253.86 km2 of ecological land was encroached, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.29 × 108t and 15.73 × 108t of CO2 emissions. Later, cropland encroached on 54,549.09 km2 of ecological land, causing a carbon stock loss of 4.03 × 108t and 14.81 × 108t of CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions from E&C accounted for 19.01 % and 18.44 % of total greenhouse gas emissions in the early and late stage, respectively. The largest carbon stock loss is in forests and shrublands. Under SSP1-RCP2.6, converting cropland to ecological land increases carbon stocks by 1.58 × 108t, offsetting 5.79 × 108t of CO2 emissions. However, under SSP2-RCP4.5 and SSP5-RCP8.5, carbon stocks decreased by 1.59 × 108t and 0.78 × 108t, leading to CO2 emissions of 5.83 × 108t and 2.87 × 108t, respectively. MSEA countries should adopt SSP1-RCP2.6, manage cropland expansion, balance economic development with ecological preservation, and strengthen international cooperation to address climate change.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.