在数值天气预报模式的基础上,加强整合已证实的技术,以量化极端洪水事件预测的不确定性

IF 6.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mitra Tanhapour , Jaber Soltani , Hadi Shakibian , Bahram Malekmohammadi , Kamila Hlavcova , Silvia Kohnova , Peter Valent
{"title":"在数值天气预报模式的基础上,加强整合已证实的技术,以量化极端洪水事件预测的不确定性","authors":"Mitra Tanhapour ,&nbsp;Jaber Soltani ,&nbsp;Hadi Shakibian ,&nbsp;Bahram Malekmohammadi ,&nbsp;Kamila Hlavcova ,&nbsp;Silvia Kohnova ,&nbsp;Peter Valent","doi":"10.1016/j.wace.2025.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> exceeded 0.95, and the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NRMSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48630,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Extremes","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100767"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The enhanced integration of proven techniques to quantify the uncertainty of forecasting extreme flood events based on numerical weather prediction models\",\"authors\":\"Mitra Tanhapour ,&nbsp;Jaber Soltani ,&nbsp;Hadi Shakibian ,&nbsp;Bahram Malekmohammadi ,&nbsp;Kamila Hlavcova ,&nbsp;Silvia Kohnova ,&nbsp;Peter Valent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wace.2025.100767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> exceeded 0.95, and the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NRMSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094725000258\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Extremes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094725000258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

做好水库入库预测是制定水库运行管理政策的重要前提之一。考虑到数值天气预报(NWP)模式的不确定性,本研究以一种新颖的方式结合成熟的技术,开发了一个综合框架,用于以次日时间步长(6小时间隔)预测基于事件的入流洪水。据此,提取了伊朗德兹河流域6次极端洪水事件的原始降水预报。利用分组数据处理方法(GMDH)和加权平均加权最小二乘回归(WA-WLSR)模型建立了多模式集成(MME)系统,对原始降水预报进行后处理。因此,我们提出了一种将Hydrologiska byr Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV)水文模型与长短期记忆(LSTM)网络(HBV-LSTM模型)相结合的方法来增强洪水预报。并对概率入流预测和确定性入流预测两种建模方法进行了对比分析。结果表明,利用WA-WLSR模型建立的MME模型的预测能力高于GMDH模型。因此,基于10 mm降水阈值,GMDH和WA-WLSR模型分别获得了最高的连续排名概率技能分数(CRPSS),分别为0.61和0.67。此外,HBV-LSTM模型和LSTM网络在生成流入洪水水文图方面都优于个体HBV模型。以HBV-LSTM模型作为最佳洪水预报方法,各洪水事件的NSE均超过0.95,NRMSE均低于0.09。结果表明,对于不同的洪水事件,使用HBV-LSTM方法的相对峰值误差的可变性为2 - 10%。我们的研究结果为确定水库运行的关键要素和加强洪水条件下的管理策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The enhanced integration of proven techniques to quantify the uncertainty of forecasting extreme flood events based on numerical weather prediction models
Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the NSE exceeded 0.95, and the NRMSE remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Climate Extremes
Weather and Climate Extremes Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Climate Extremes Target Audience: Academics Decision makers International development agencies Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Civil society Focus Areas: Research in weather and climate extremes Monitoring and early warning systems Assessment of vulnerability and impacts Developing and implementing intervention policies Effective risk management and adaptation practices Engagement of local communities in adopting coping strategies Information and communication strategies tailored to local and regional needs and circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信