Mitra Tanhapour , Jaber Soltani , Hadi Shakibian , Bahram Malekmohammadi , Kamila Hlavcova , Silvia Kohnova , Peter Valent
{"title":"在数值天气预报模式的基础上,加强整合已证实的技术,以量化极端洪水事件预测的不确定性","authors":"Mitra Tanhapour , Jaber Soltani , Hadi Shakibian , Bahram Malekmohammadi , Kamila Hlavcova , Silvia Kohnova , Peter Valent","doi":"10.1016/j.wace.2025.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> exceeded 0.95, and the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NRMSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48630,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Extremes","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100767"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The enhanced integration of proven techniques to quantify the uncertainty of forecasting extreme flood events based on numerical weather prediction models\",\"authors\":\"Mitra Tanhapour , Jaber Soltani , Hadi Shakibian , Bahram Malekmohammadi , Kamila Hlavcova , Silvia Kohnova , Peter Valent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wace.2025.100767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> exceeded 0.95, and the <span><math><mrow><mtext>NRMSE</mtext></mrow></math></span> remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094725000258\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Extremes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094725000258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The enhanced integration of proven techniques to quantify the uncertainty of forecasting extreme flood events based on numerical weather prediction models
Skillful forecasting of reservoir inflow is one of the main prerequisites for determining reservoir operation and management policies. This research incorporates proven techniques in a novel way to develop a comprehensive framework for forecasting event-based inflow floods with sub-daily time steps (6-h intervals), considering the uncertainty of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. Accordingly, raw precipitation forecasts were extracted for six extreme flood events in the Dez River basin, Iran. A Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) system was developed using the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Weighted Average-Weighted Least Square Regression (WA-WLSR) models to post-process raw precipitation forecasts. We thereupon proposed an approach that combined the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model with the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network (HBV-LSTM model) to enhance flood forecasting. Moreover, a comparative analysis was performed between the modeling approaches, i.e., probabilistic inflow forecasting and deterministic inflow forecasting. The results revealed that the forecasting skill of the MME model built using the WA-WLSR model was higher than that of the GMDH model. Accordingly, the highest Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS) of 0.61 and 0.67 were achieved by the GMDH and WA-WLSR models, respectively, based on a precipitation threshold of 10 mm. Additionally, both the HBV-LSTM model and the LSTM network outperformed the individual HBV model in producing inflow flood hydrographs. Based on the best flood forecasting approach, i.e., the HBV-LSTM model, the exceeded 0.95, and the remained below 0.09 for various flood events. The outcomes indicated a variability of 2–10 % in the relative peak error using the HBV-LSTM approach for different flood events. Our findings provide valuable insights for determining the key elements of reservoir operations and enhancing management strategies under flood conditions.
期刊介绍:
Weather and Climate Extremes
Target Audience:
Academics
Decision makers
International development agencies
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
Civil society
Focus Areas:
Research in weather and climate extremes
Monitoring and early warning systems
Assessment of vulnerability and impacts
Developing and implementing intervention policies
Effective risk management and adaptation practices
Engagement of local communities in adopting coping strategies
Information and communication strategies tailored to local and regional needs and circumstances