体内软组织力学应变分布对预防压疮的确证:简化有限元分析与实验应变场的对比分析

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Alexandre Segain , Helene Pillet , Stefano Zappalá , Giuseppe Sciume , Pierre-Yves Rohan
{"title":"体内软组织力学应变分布对预防压疮的确证:简化有限元分析与实验应变场的对比分析","authors":"Alexandre Segain ,&nbsp;Helene Pillet ,&nbsp;Stefano Zappalá ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sciume ,&nbsp;Pierre-Yves Rohan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of <em>in vivo</em> strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate <em>in vivo</em> compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Segain ,&nbsp;Helene Pillet ,&nbsp;Stefano Zappalá ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sciume ,&nbsp;Pierre-Yves Rohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of <em>in vivo</em> strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate <em>in vivo</em> compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612500133X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612500133X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

压疮病因学的基础研究表明,生物软组织中机械应变的浓度对其发展至关重要。直接测量体内菌株与临床常规不相容。为了克服这个问题,生物力学界提出了几种有限元模型(FEM)来根据成像数据估计应变。然而,该模型预测的机械载荷与软组织应变分布之间的潜在关系尚未得到直接的实验验证,因此必须在进行任何临床评估之前获得此类验证证据。基于在N = 10名健康志愿者中获得的实验结果(zappal等人,2024),研究了本研究中提出的基于坐骨区域简化几何表示的有限元模型的建模假设的相关性(Macron等人,2020)。提出了一种方法来估计从可用的MRI掩模构建模型所需的不同参数。然后用有限元法估算了在体压缩应变和剪切应变。然后将所得应变与实验数据进行比较。结果表明,模型假设导致肌肉组织的压缩和剪切应变的总体高估,特别是坐骨结节直接下的肌肉组织。同样,该模型低估了脂肪组织中的应变(剪切应变的平均误差为−0.2)。这项研究强调了这样一个事实,即通常为肌肉组织(均匀软组织层)的几何建模所做的假设导致对峰值应变局部化的不正确估计。进一步的工作应该做,以改善肌肉组织的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields

Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields
Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of in vivo strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate in vivo compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信