Alexandre Segain , Helene Pillet , Stefano Zappalá , Giuseppe Sciume , Pierre-Yves Rohan
{"title":"体内软组织力学应变分布对预防压疮的确证:简化有限元分析与实验应变场的对比分析","authors":"Alexandre Segain , Helene Pillet , Stefano Zappalá , Giuseppe Sciume , Pierre-Yves Rohan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of <em>in vivo</em> strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate <em>in vivo</em> compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Segain , Helene Pillet , Stefano Zappalá , Giuseppe Sciume , Pierre-Yves Rohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of <em>in vivo</em> strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate <em>in vivo</em> compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612500133X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612500133X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields
Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of in vivo strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate in vivo compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of −0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.