树木对气流分布的阻力影响的快速流体动力学模拟

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Ruibin Li , Yi Zhao , Liangzhu (Leon) Wang , Jianlei Niu , Xing Shi , Naiping Gao
{"title":"树木对气流分布的阻力影响的快速流体动力学模拟","authors":"Ruibin Li ,&nbsp;Yi Zhao ,&nbsp;Liangzhu (Leon) Wang ,&nbsp;Jianlei Niu ,&nbsp;Xing Shi ,&nbsp;Naiping Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trees are widely recognized for their effectiveness in regulating urban microclimates through shading, absorption and reflection of solar radiation, and transpiration. However, their drag effect on airflow may influence this regulatory capacity. Incorporating tree source terms related to leaf area density (LAD) and drag coefficient (<em>C<sub>d</sub></em>) into governing equations provides a balance between computational accuracy and efficiency when studying the drag effect of trees on airflow. Nevertheless, conventional simulation methods typically require significant computational time, limiting their practicality. In this study, tree source terms are integrated into the Fast Fluid Dynamics (FFD) method, and the computational performance of three FFD methods (i.e., SLFFD, NIPC, and NSPF) is evaluated for quickly predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow. Results indicate negligible differences between the predictions of FFD methods and conventional numerical simulation methods such as the Pressure-Implicit with Splitting of Operators (PISO) method. At the single tree canopy scale, the computational speeds of NIPC and NSPF methods are about 1.77 and 1.96 times faster than the PISO method, respectively, while the SLFFD method is about 1.50 times faster. When using the maximum time step size and a first-order discretization scheme, the computational speed of the SLFFD method increases to 4.13 times that of the PISO method. In larger computational domains, the improvement in computational speed provided by the FFD methods becomes even more pronounced. In conclusion, the FFD methods coupled with tree source terms significantly improve computational efficiency for predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 113039"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast fluid dynamics simulations of the drag effect of trees on airflow distributions\",\"authors\":\"Ruibin Li ,&nbsp;Yi Zhao ,&nbsp;Liangzhu (Leon) Wang ,&nbsp;Jianlei Niu ,&nbsp;Xing Shi ,&nbsp;Naiping Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Trees are widely recognized for their effectiveness in regulating urban microclimates through shading, absorption and reflection of solar radiation, and transpiration. However, their drag effect on airflow may influence this regulatory capacity. Incorporating tree source terms related to leaf area density (LAD) and drag coefficient (<em>C<sub>d</sub></em>) into governing equations provides a balance between computational accuracy and efficiency when studying the drag effect of trees on airflow. Nevertheless, conventional simulation methods typically require significant computational time, limiting their practicality. In this study, tree source terms are integrated into the Fast Fluid Dynamics (FFD) method, and the computational performance of three FFD methods (i.e., SLFFD, NIPC, and NSPF) is evaluated for quickly predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow. Results indicate negligible differences between the predictions of FFD methods and conventional numerical simulation methods such as the Pressure-Implicit with Splitting of Operators (PISO) method. At the single tree canopy scale, the computational speeds of NIPC and NSPF methods are about 1.77 and 1.96 times faster than the PISO method, respectively, while the SLFFD method is about 1.50 times faster. When using the maximum time step size and a first-order discretization scheme, the computational speed of the SLFFD method increases to 4.13 times that of the PISO method. In larger computational domains, the improvement in computational speed provided by the FFD methods becomes even more pronounced. In conclusion, the FFD methods coupled with tree source terms significantly improve computational efficiency for predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325005207\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325005207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

树木通过遮阳、吸收和反射太阳辐射以及蒸腾作用在调节城市小气候方面的有效性得到广泛认可。然而,它们对气流的阻力效应可能会影响这种调节能力。在研究树木对气流的阻力影响时,将与叶面积密度(LAD)和阻力系数(Cd)相关的树源项纳入控制方程可以在计算精度和效率之间取得平衡。然而,传统的模拟方法通常需要大量的计算时间,限制了它们的实用性。本研究将树木源项整合到快速流体动力学(FFD)方法中,并对SLFFD、NIPC和NSPF三种FFD方法的计算性能进行了评价,以快速预测树木对气流的阻力影响。结果表明,FFD方法的预测结果与传统数值模拟方法(如PISO方法)之间的差异可以忽略不计。在单树冠尺度下,NIPC和NSPF方法的计算速度分别比PISO方法快1.77倍和1.96倍,SLFFD方法快1.50倍。当使用最大时间步长和一阶离散化方案时,SLFFD方法的计算速度是PISO方法的4.13倍。在更大的计算领域,由FFD方法提供的计算速度的改进变得更加明显。综上所述,结合树木源项的FFD方法显著提高了预测树木对气流阻力影响的计算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast fluid dynamics simulations of the drag effect of trees on airflow distributions
Trees are widely recognized for their effectiveness in regulating urban microclimates through shading, absorption and reflection of solar radiation, and transpiration. However, their drag effect on airflow may influence this regulatory capacity. Incorporating tree source terms related to leaf area density (LAD) and drag coefficient (Cd) into governing equations provides a balance between computational accuracy and efficiency when studying the drag effect of trees on airflow. Nevertheless, conventional simulation methods typically require significant computational time, limiting their practicality. In this study, tree source terms are integrated into the Fast Fluid Dynamics (FFD) method, and the computational performance of three FFD methods (i.e., SLFFD, NIPC, and NSPF) is evaluated for quickly predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow. Results indicate negligible differences between the predictions of FFD methods and conventional numerical simulation methods such as the Pressure-Implicit with Splitting of Operators (PISO) method. At the single tree canopy scale, the computational speeds of NIPC and NSPF methods are about 1.77 and 1.96 times faster than the PISO method, respectively, while the SLFFD method is about 1.50 times faster. When using the maximum time step size and a first-order discretization scheme, the computational speed of the SLFFD method increases to 4.13 times that of the PISO method. In larger computational domains, the improvement in computational speed provided by the FFD methods becomes even more pronounced. In conclusion, the FFD methods coupled with tree source terms significantly improve computational efficiency for predicting the drag effect of trees on airflow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信