通过流式细胞术评估hiv感染者CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数的成本效益控制策略

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Selim Merdan , Yağmur Ekenoğlu Merdan , Okan Aydoğan
{"title":"通过流式细胞术评估hiv感染者CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数的成本效益控制策略","authors":"Selim Merdan ,&nbsp;Yağmur Ekenoğlu Merdan ,&nbsp;Okan Aydoğan","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Monitoring CD4+ <em>T</em> lymphocyte levels is a cornerstone in managing HIV infection, essential for assessing immune status and determining treatment strategies. However, the high cost of standard flow cytometry methods limits access to these diagnostic tools in low-income settings. This study evaluates a cost-effective alternative method (AM) with a simplified gating strategy and reduced antibody use compared to the standard method (SM), which is based on PanLeucogating (PLG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter study analyzed 1,001 HIV-positive patient samples in a central laboratory serving six hospitals in Istanbul. SM used four antibodies (CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8), while AM utilized only CD4/CD8. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a BD FACS Canto II system, and CD4⁺ T cell percentages were compared between methods using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A strong correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.993, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) was observed between AM and SM, with no statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.339). However, AM systematically reported lower CD4⁺ percentages, likely due to the absence of CD3-based gating and the use of FS/SS plots instead of CD45 for gating lymphocytes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With one of the largest datasets among similar studies, our findings suggest that AM, which uses 50 % fewer antibodies, is a cost-effective and viable alternative for CD4⁺ enumeration in HIV monitoring. However, further validation in diverse epidemiological settings and clinical impact assessments are required before widespread clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"112 4","pages":"Article 116851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a cost-effective gating strategy for CD4+ T lymphocyte enumeration in HIV-infected individuals via flow cytometry\",\"authors\":\"Selim Merdan ,&nbsp;Yağmur Ekenoğlu Merdan ,&nbsp;Okan Aydoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Monitoring CD4+ <em>T</em> lymphocyte levels is a cornerstone in managing HIV infection, essential for assessing immune status and determining treatment strategies. However, the high cost of standard flow cytometry methods limits access to these diagnostic tools in low-income settings. This study evaluates a cost-effective alternative method (AM) with a simplified gating strategy and reduced antibody use compared to the standard method (SM), which is based on PanLeucogating (PLG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter study analyzed 1,001 HIV-positive patient samples in a central laboratory serving six hospitals in Istanbul. SM used four antibodies (CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8), while AM utilized only CD4/CD8. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a BD FACS Canto II system, and CD4⁺ T cell percentages were compared between methods using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A strong correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.993, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) was observed between AM and SM, with no statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.339). However, AM systematically reported lower CD4⁺ percentages, likely due to the absence of CD3-based gating and the use of FS/SS plots instead of CD45 for gating lymphocytes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With one of the largest datasets among similar studies, our findings suggest that AM, which uses 50 % fewer antibodies, is a cost-effective and viable alternative for CD4⁺ enumeration in HIV monitoring. However, further validation in diverse epidemiological settings and clinical impact assessments are required before widespread clinical implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease\",\"volume\":\"112 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 116851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325001749\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325001749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监测CD4+ T淋巴细胞水平是管理HIV感染的基础,对于评估免疫状态和确定治疗策略至关重要。然而,标准流式细胞术方法的高成本限制了低收入地区使用这些诊断工具。本研究评估了一种具有成本效益的替代方法(AM),该方法具有简化的门控策略,与基于泛leucogating (PLG)的标准方法(SM)相比,减少了抗体的使用。方法本多中心研究分析了伊斯坦布尔6家医院中心实验室的1001例hiv阳性患者样本。SM使用四种抗体(CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8),而AM仅使用CD4/CD8。在BD FACS Canto II系统上进行流式细胞术分析,使用Pearson’s相关系数和Mann-Whitney U检验比较CD4 + T细胞百分比。结果sa强相关(r = 0.993, p <;AM与SM之间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.339)。然而,AM系统地报道了较低的CD4 +百分比,这可能是由于缺乏基于cd3的门控和使用FS/SS图而不是CD45来门控淋巴细胞。结论我们的研究结果是同类研究中最大的数据集之一,表明AM使用的抗体少50%,是一种具有成本效益的、可行的替代CD4 +计数的HIV监测方法。然而,在广泛的临床应用之前,需要在不同的流行病学环境中进行进一步的验证和临床影响评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a cost-effective gating strategy for CD4+ T lymphocyte enumeration in HIV-infected individuals via flow cytometry

Evaluation of a cost-effective gating strategy for CD4+ T lymphocyte enumeration in HIV-infected individuals via flow cytometry

Background

Monitoring CD4+ T lymphocyte levels is a cornerstone in managing HIV infection, essential for assessing immune status and determining treatment strategies. However, the high cost of standard flow cytometry methods limits access to these diagnostic tools in low-income settings. This study evaluates a cost-effective alternative method (AM) with a simplified gating strategy and reduced antibody use compared to the standard method (SM), which is based on PanLeucogating (PLG).

Methods

This multicenter study analyzed 1,001 HIV-positive patient samples in a central laboratory serving six hospitals in Istanbul. SM used four antibodies (CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8), while AM utilized only CD4/CD8. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a BD FACS Canto II system, and CD4⁺ T cell percentages were compared between methods using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

A strong correlation (r = 0.993, p < 0.001) was observed between AM and SM, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.339). However, AM systematically reported lower CD4⁺ percentages, likely due to the absence of CD3-based gating and the use of FS/SS plots instead of CD45 for gating lymphocytes.

Conclusion

With one of the largest datasets among similar studies, our findings suggest that AM, which uses 50 % fewer antibodies, is a cost-effective and viable alternative for CD4⁺ enumeration in HIV monitoring. However, further validation in diverse epidemiological settings and clinical impact assessments are required before widespread clinical implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信