在绿色氢系统多目标优化中整合生命周期评估:文献综述和方法挑战

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Diego Larrahondo Chavez , Catherine Azzaro-Pantel , Florent Montignac , Alain Ruby
{"title":"在绿色氢系统多目标优化中整合生命周期评估:文献综述和方法挑战","authors":"Diego Larrahondo Chavez ,&nbsp;Catherine Azzaro-Pantel ,&nbsp;Florent Montignac ,&nbsp;Alain Ruby","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global demand for sustainable energy solutions intensifies, reducing the environmental impact of energy systems while maintaining cost-effectiveness has become imperative, particularly for emerging energy carriers like hydrogen. This article presents a comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective optimization (MOO) in the context of green hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) systems, focusing on key contributions from 2019 to 2023. The review categorizes the literature into three areas: (i) Recent LCA studies on green H<sub>2</sub> production, (ii) MOO studies that include LCA of renewable energy systems, (iii) Research integrating environmental criteria into MOO for green H<sub>2</sub> systems. The review highlights significant gaps, particularly the limited depth of environmental detail in LCAs integrated into MOO, compared to standalone environmental LCAs. Additionally, the analysis reveals a lack of end-of-life considerations across all study categories. In terms of optimization, most research adopts a bi-objective framework, typically focusing on economic performance and a single environmental metric (often CO<sub>2</sub> emissions), thereby constraining the development of more comprehensive, sustainable systems. The article concludes by offering recommendations: future LCAs of hydrogen systems should incorporate advanced optimization algorithms, broaden their scope to cradle-to-grave assessments, and utilize prospective methods for better anticipation of future environmental impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 115689"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating life cycle assessment in multi-objective optimization of green hydrogen systems: a review of literature and methodological challenges\",\"authors\":\"Diego Larrahondo Chavez ,&nbsp;Catherine Azzaro-Pantel ,&nbsp;Florent Montignac ,&nbsp;Alain Ruby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global demand for sustainable energy solutions intensifies, reducing the environmental impact of energy systems while maintaining cost-effectiveness has become imperative, particularly for emerging energy carriers like hydrogen. This article presents a comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective optimization (MOO) in the context of green hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) systems, focusing on key contributions from 2019 to 2023. The review categorizes the literature into three areas: (i) Recent LCA studies on green H<sub>2</sub> production, (ii) MOO studies that include LCA of renewable energy systems, (iii) Research integrating environmental criteria into MOO for green H<sub>2</sub> systems. The review highlights significant gaps, particularly the limited depth of environmental detail in LCAs integrated into MOO, compared to standalone environmental LCAs. Additionally, the analysis reveals a lack of end-of-life considerations across all study categories. In terms of optimization, most research adopts a bi-objective framework, typically focusing on economic performance and a single environmental metric (often CO<sub>2</sub> emissions), thereby constraining the development of more comprehensive, sustainable systems. The article concludes by offering recommendations: future LCAs of hydrogen systems should incorporate advanced optimization algorithms, broaden their scope to cradle-to-grave assessments, and utilize prospective methods for better anticipation of future environmental impacts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"217 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003624\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球对可持续能源解决方案的需求不断增加,在保持成本效益的同时减少能源系统对环境的影响已变得势在必行,尤其是对氢等新兴能源载体而言。本文全面回顾了绿色氢(H2)系统背景下的生命周期评估(LCA)和多目标优化(MOO),重点介绍了2019年至2023年期间的主要贡献。该综述将文献分为三个领域:(i)最近关于绿色H2生产的LCA研究,(ii)包括可再生能源系统LCA的MOO研究,(iii)将环境标准纳入绿色H2系统MOO的研究。该审查强调了重大差距,特别是与独立的环境lca相比,将lca纳入MOO的环境细节深度有限。此外,分析显示,在所有研究类别中都缺乏对生命末期的考虑。在优化方面,大多数研究采用双目标框架,通常侧重于经济绩效和单一环境指标(通常是二氧化碳排放),从而限制了更全面、可持续系统的发展。文章最后提出建议:未来氢系统的lca应纳入先进的优化算法,将其范围扩大到从摇篮到坟墓的评估,并利用前瞻性方法更好地预测未来的环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating life cycle assessment in multi-objective optimization of green hydrogen systems: a review of literature and methodological challenges
As global demand for sustainable energy solutions intensifies, reducing the environmental impact of energy systems while maintaining cost-effectiveness has become imperative, particularly for emerging energy carriers like hydrogen. This article presents a comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective optimization (MOO) in the context of green hydrogen (H2) systems, focusing on key contributions from 2019 to 2023. The review categorizes the literature into three areas: (i) Recent LCA studies on green H2 production, (ii) MOO studies that include LCA of renewable energy systems, (iii) Research integrating environmental criteria into MOO for green H2 systems. The review highlights significant gaps, particularly the limited depth of environmental detail in LCAs integrated into MOO, compared to standalone environmental LCAs. Additionally, the analysis reveals a lack of end-of-life considerations across all study categories. In terms of optimization, most research adopts a bi-objective framework, typically focusing on economic performance and a single environmental metric (often CO2 emissions), thereby constraining the development of more comprehensive, sustainable systems. The article concludes by offering recommendations: future LCAs of hydrogen systems should incorporate advanced optimization algorithms, broaden their scope to cradle-to-grave assessments, and utilize prospective methods for better anticipation of future environmental impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信