晶体硅光伏组件渗滤液的水生毒性

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Brianna C. Tavolacci, Preeti Nain, Annick Anctil
{"title":"晶体硅光伏组件渗滤液的水生毒性","authors":"Brianna C. Tavolacci,&nbsp;Preeti Nain,&nbsp;Annick Anctil","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous ecotoxicological assessments of solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies vary considerably and focus solely on the active cell layer. A comprehensive evaluation of all possible sources of toxicity is required for proper disposal classification of waste materials. We evaluated the aquatic ecotoxicity of separated PV components from three crystalline silicon modules to crustacea, <em>Daphnia magna</em>. Modules were separated into three categories for testing: 1) powdered glass and cell, 2) encapsulation and back sheet polymers, and 3) junction box and cables. Batch leachates were used in bioassays and assessed for metal and microplastic leaching. The powder and polymers from two tested modules had little observed impact on daphnids, while the third showed significant toxicity with EC50s at 5% or less leachate. One junction box and cable mixture had significant toxicity with an EC50 of less than 10%. Upon metal analysis, Al and Ag leached in high concentrations upon metal analysis and were the primary suspects for ecotoxicological effects. Microplastics were not detected in powder or encapsulation and back sheet leachates, while there was evidence of hydrocarbon polymers in junction box and cable leachates. This work confirmed that metals in the active layer of solar modules are a primary source of concern, and potential microplastic leaching from junction boxes and cables should not be overlooked. Overall, the acute toxicity of silicon solar photovoltaics depends on the module type, components considered, and leachate exposure concentrations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125400"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aquatic toxicity of leachates from crystalline silicon photovoltaic components\",\"authors\":\"Brianna C. Tavolacci,&nbsp;Preeti Nain,&nbsp;Annick Anctil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous ecotoxicological assessments of solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies vary considerably and focus solely on the active cell layer. A comprehensive evaluation of all possible sources of toxicity is required for proper disposal classification of waste materials. We evaluated the aquatic ecotoxicity of separated PV components from three crystalline silicon modules to crustacea, <em>Daphnia magna</em>. Modules were separated into three categories for testing: 1) powdered glass and cell, 2) encapsulation and back sheet polymers, and 3) junction box and cables. Batch leachates were used in bioassays and assessed for metal and microplastic leaching. The powder and polymers from two tested modules had little observed impact on daphnids, while the third showed significant toxicity with EC50s at 5% or less leachate. One junction box and cable mixture had significant toxicity with an EC50 of less than 10%. Upon metal analysis, Al and Ag leached in high concentrations upon metal analysis and were the primary suspects for ecotoxicological effects. Microplastics were not detected in powder or encapsulation and back sheet leachates, while there was evidence of hydrocarbon polymers in junction box and cable leachates. This work confirmed that metals in the active layer of solar modules are a primary source of concern, and potential microplastic leaching from junction boxes and cables should not be overlooked. Overall, the acute toxicity of silicon solar photovoltaics depends on the module type, components considered, and leachate exposure concentrations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"382 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013763\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前对太阳能光伏(PV)技术的生态毒理学评估差异很大,并且只关注活性细胞层。需要对所有可能的毒性来源进行全面评价,以便对废料进行适当的处置和分类。我们评估了从三个晶体硅组件中分离出来的光伏组件对大水蚤的水生生态毒性。模块分为三类进行测试:1)粉末玻璃和电池,2)封装和背片聚合物,以及3)接线盒和电缆。间歇式渗滤液用于生物测定,并评估了金属和微塑料的浸出。来自两个测试模块的粉末和聚合物对水蚤的影响很小,而第三个模块显示出5%或更少的ec50的显著毒性。其中一种接线盒与电缆混合物毒性显著,EC50小于10%。在金属分析中,铝和银在金属分析中以高浓度浸出,是生态毒理学效应的主要嫌疑人。粉末或封装和背面片渗滤液中未检测到微塑料,而在接线盒和电缆渗滤液中有碳氢化合物聚合物的证据。这项工作证实,太阳能组件活性层中的金属是一个主要的担忧来源,从接线盒和电缆中潜在的微塑料浸出也不应被忽视。总的来说,硅太阳能光伏的急性毒性取决于组件类型,所考虑的组件和渗滤液暴露浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aquatic toxicity of leachates from crystalline silicon photovoltaic components
Previous ecotoxicological assessments of solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies vary considerably and focus solely on the active cell layer. A comprehensive evaluation of all possible sources of toxicity is required for proper disposal classification of waste materials. We evaluated the aquatic ecotoxicity of separated PV components from three crystalline silicon modules to crustacea, Daphnia magna. Modules were separated into three categories for testing: 1) powdered glass and cell, 2) encapsulation and back sheet polymers, and 3) junction box and cables. Batch leachates were used in bioassays and assessed for metal and microplastic leaching. The powder and polymers from two tested modules had little observed impact on daphnids, while the third showed significant toxicity with EC50s at 5% or less leachate. One junction box and cable mixture had significant toxicity with an EC50 of less than 10%. Upon metal analysis, Al and Ag leached in high concentrations upon metal analysis and were the primary suspects for ecotoxicological effects. Microplastics were not detected in powder or encapsulation and back sheet leachates, while there was evidence of hydrocarbon polymers in junction box and cable leachates. This work confirmed that metals in the active layer of solar modules are a primary source of concern, and potential microplastic leaching from junction boxes and cables should not be overlooked. Overall, the acute toxicity of silicon solar photovoltaics depends on the module type, components considered, and leachate exposure concentrations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信