环境和资源可持续性:拆除或改造旧牛棚的问题

Bosompem Ahunoabobirim Agya , Portia Agyemang , Kwame Anokye
{"title":"环境和资源可持续性:拆除或改造旧牛棚的问题","authors":"Bosompem Ahunoabobirim Agya ,&nbsp;Portia Agyemang ,&nbsp;Kwame Anokye","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study critically evaluates the sustainability of demolishing versus converting aging cattle sheds by synthesizing evidence from 23 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025. Employing a rapid review methodology combined with life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, and the triple bottom line framework, the research compares the environmental, economic, and socio-cultural impacts of each approach. Findings reveal that adaptive reuse substantially lowers greenhouse gas emissions, waste generation, and energy consumption while preserving cultural heritage and delivering long-term economic benefits despite higher initial investments. The study highlights the need for targeted policy incentives and robust assessment methods to guide sustainable rural infrastructure management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and resource sustainability: The question of demolition or conversion of old cattle sheds\",\"authors\":\"Bosompem Ahunoabobirim Agya ,&nbsp;Portia Agyemang ,&nbsp;Kwame Anokye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study critically evaluates the sustainability of demolishing versus converting aging cattle sheds by synthesizing evidence from 23 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025. Employing a rapid review methodology combined with life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, and the triple bottom line framework, the research compares the environmental, economic, and socio-cultural impacts of each approach. Findings reveal that adaptive reuse substantially lowers greenhouse gas emissions, waste generation, and energy consumption while preserving cultural heritage and delivering long-term economic benefits despite higher initial investments. The study highlights the need for targeted policy incentives and robust assessment methods to guide sustainable rural infrastructure management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过综合2010年至2025年间发表的23篇同行评议文章的证据,批判性地评估了拆除与改造老化牛棚的可持续性。该研究采用快速评估方法,结合生命周期评估、循环经济原则和三重底线框架,比较了每种方法的环境、经济和社会文化影响。研究结果表明,适应性再利用大大降低了温室气体排放、废物产生和能源消耗,同时保护了文化遗产,尽管初始投资较高,但仍能带来长期经济效益。该研究强调需要有针对性的政策激励和强有力的评估方法来指导可持续的农村基础设施管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental and resource sustainability: The question of demolition or conversion of old cattle sheds
This study critically evaluates the sustainability of demolishing versus converting aging cattle sheds by synthesizing evidence from 23 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025. Employing a rapid review methodology combined with life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, and the triple bottom line framework, the research compares the environmental, economic, and socio-cultural impacts of each approach. Findings reveal that adaptive reuse substantially lowers greenhouse gas emissions, waste generation, and energy consumption while preserving cultural heritage and delivering long-term economic benefits despite higher initial investments. The study highlights the need for targeted policy incentives and robust assessment methods to guide sustainable rural infrastructure management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信