CrAssphage在人类粪便污染检测中的可靠性:跨区域MST标记物评估

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
D. Toribio-Avedillo , E. Ballesté , C. García-Aljaro , C. Stange , A. Tiehm , C. Sánchez-Cid , E. Mulogo , A. Nasser , R. Santos , K. Nemes , A.R. Blanch
{"title":"CrAssphage在人类粪便污染检测中的可靠性:跨区域MST标记物评估","authors":"D. Toribio-Avedillo ,&nbsp;E. Ballesté ,&nbsp;C. García-Aljaro ,&nbsp;C. Stange ,&nbsp;A. Tiehm ,&nbsp;C. Sánchez-Cid ,&nbsp;E. Mulogo ,&nbsp;A. Nasser ,&nbsp;R. Santos ,&nbsp;K. Nemes ,&nbsp;A.R. Blanch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial Source Tracking (MST) markers play a key role in identifying sources of fecal contamination, particularly human-associated pollution, which is critical for public health. This study investigates the distribution and reliability of three MST markers (crAssphage, HMBif, and HF183) across various environmental contexts in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Samples were obtained from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and rivers across different catchment areas, including sampling during extreme weather conditions such as heavy rainfall and drought. The concentrations of these MST markers were measured and compared with traditional fecal indicators.</div><div>The obtained results indicate that crAssphage showed consistently the highest prevalence and concentrations in all regions and sample types, demonstrating its robustness as a marker of human fecal contamination. Population density and climatic conditions significantly influenced marker levels, with the highest concentrations found in highly populated areas with moderate climates. The impact of extreme weather events was different for each condition: heavy rainfall resulted in elevated MST marker concentrations, likely due to sediment resuspension, while drought led to more inconsistent results.</div><div>Strong correlations were observed among the three MST markers and between these markers and conventional fecal indicators. This study underscores the value of crAssphage as a reliable and effective tool for tracking human fecal pollution and highlights the influence of environmental and climatic factors on MST marker behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125399"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability of CrAssphage in human fecal pollution detection: A cross-regional MST marker assessment\",\"authors\":\"D. Toribio-Avedillo ,&nbsp;E. Ballesté ,&nbsp;C. García-Aljaro ,&nbsp;C. Stange ,&nbsp;A. Tiehm ,&nbsp;C. Sánchez-Cid ,&nbsp;E. Mulogo ,&nbsp;A. Nasser ,&nbsp;R. Santos ,&nbsp;K. Nemes ,&nbsp;A.R. Blanch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Microbial Source Tracking (MST) markers play a key role in identifying sources of fecal contamination, particularly human-associated pollution, which is critical for public health. This study investigates the distribution and reliability of three MST markers (crAssphage, HMBif, and HF183) across various environmental contexts in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Samples were obtained from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and rivers across different catchment areas, including sampling during extreme weather conditions such as heavy rainfall and drought. The concentrations of these MST markers were measured and compared with traditional fecal indicators.</div><div>The obtained results indicate that crAssphage showed consistently the highest prevalence and concentrations in all regions and sample types, demonstrating its robustness as a marker of human fecal contamination. Population density and climatic conditions significantly influenced marker levels, with the highest concentrations found in highly populated areas with moderate climates. The impact of extreme weather events was different for each condition: heavy rainfall resulted in elevated MST marker concentrations, likely due to sediment resuspension, while drought led to more inconsistent results.</div><div>Strong correlations were observed among the three MST markers and between these markers and conventional fecal indicators. This study underscores the value of crAssphage as a reliable and effective tool for tracking human fecal pollution and highlights the influence of environmental and climatic factors on MST marker behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"382 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微生物源追踪(MST)标记在确定粪便污染源,特别是与人类有关的污染源方面发挥关键作用,这对公共卫生至关重要。本研究调查了三种MST标记(crAssphage、HMBif和HF183)在欧洲、亚洲和非洲不同环境背景下的分布和可靠性。样本来自不同集水区的污水处理厂和河流,包括在暴雨和干旱等极端天气条件下的采样。测量这些MST标记物的浓度,并与传统的粪便指标进行比较。所得结果表明,在所有地区和样品类型中,草包菌的患病率和浓度始终最高,表明其作为人类粪便污染标记物的稳稳性。人口密度和气候条件显著影响标志物水平,在人口密集、气候温和的地区,浓度最高。极端天气事件对每种情况的影响是不同的:强降雨导致MST标记物浓度升高,可能是由于沉积物再悬浮,而干旱导致的结果更加不一致。三种MST标记物之间以及这些标记物与常规粪便指标之间存在很强的相关性。本研究强调了草包作为跟踪人类粪便污染的可靠有效工具的价值,并强调了环境和气候因素对MST标记物行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The reliability of CrAssphage in human fecal pollution detection: A cross-regional MST marker assessment

The reliability of CrAssphage in human fecal pollution detection: A cross-regional MST marker assessment
Microbial Source Tracking (MST) markers play a key role in identifying sources of fecal contamination, particularly human-associated pollution, which is critical for public health. This study investigates the distribution and reliability of three MST markers (crAssphage, HMBif, and HF183) across various environmental contexts in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Samples were obtained from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and rivers across different catchment areas, including sampling during extreme weather conditions such as heavy rainfall and drought. The concentrations of these MST markers were measured and compared with traditional fecal indicators.
The obtained results indicate that crAssphage showed consistently the highest prevalence and concentrations in all regions and sample types, demonstrating its robustness as a marker of human fecal contamination. Population density and climatic conditions significantly influenced marker levels, with the highest concentrations found in highly populated areas with moderate climates. The impact of extreme weather events was different for each condition: heavy rainfall resulted in elevated MST marker concentrations, likely due to sediment resuspension, while drought led to more inconsistent results.
Strong correlations were observed among the three MST markers and between these markers and conventional fecal indicators. This study underscores the value of crAssphage as a reliable and effective tool for tracking human fecal pollution and highlights the influence of environmental and climatic factors on MST marker behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信