Shweta Kapur,Kwame S Sakyi,Joshua L Haworth,Prateek Lohia,Daniel J Goble
{"title":"社区居住成年人自我报告与基于绩效的平衡测量之间的不一致。","authors":"Shweta Kapur,Kwame S Sakyi,Joshua L Haworth,Prateek Lohia,Daniel J Goble","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMost population-based studies and clinical fall-risk screenings depend on self-reported balance information. This study investigated the congruency between self-reported balance information and performance-based balance measure (Romberg Test of Standing Balance on Firm and Compliant Support Surfaces, RTSBFCSS). It also explored predictors of congruency between these balance measures.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDesign: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 2001-2004 (latest data cycles with variables of interest). Participants: Nationally representative sample of 4939 adults (≥40 years). Procedures: The proportion of individuals who underestimated (self-reported no balance problem but failed RTSBFCSS) or overestimated (self-reported having a balance problem but passed RTSBFCSS) their balance problem was calculated. Predictors of congruency among balance measures were explored using multivariable regression.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe study included 4,939 adults (mean-age 56.0 years (0.3 SE), 51.2% females). Of all participants, 36.9% had evidence of balance problems on RTSBFCSS. About 70% of those with performance-based balance deficits reported no balance problems on the self-reported question. About 35.8% (95%CI:33.7%-38.1%) were incongruent among balance measures. Specifically, 25.8% (95%CI:23.9%-27.8%) under-estimated their balance issues, and 10.1% (95%CI:8.8%-11.5%) over-estimated their balance problems. Males had 4% reduction in odds of congruency among balance measures with every one-year increase in age compared to 3% reduction in the same for females (aOR=0.96; 95%CI:0.95-0.96; p-value<0.001 males; aOR=0.97; 95%CI:0.96-0.98; p-value<0.001 females).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAbout 7 in 10 adults with performance-based balance deficits were unaware of their condition. Sole reliance on self-reported information for balance screening may be inadequate. Results can help identify populations more likely to have discrepancies between balance measures.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incongruence between Self-report and Performance-based Measure of Balance in Community-Dwelling Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Shweta Kapur,Kwame S Sakyi,Joshua L Haworth,Prateek Lohia,Daniel J Goble\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nMost population-based studies and clinical fall-risk screenings depend on self-reported balance information. This study investigated the congruency between self-reported balance information and performance-based balance measure (Romberg Test of Standing Balance on Firm and Compliant Support Surfaces, RTSBFCSS). It also explored predictors of congruency between these balance measures.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nDesign: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 2001-2004 (latest data cycles with variables of interest). Participants: Nationally representative sample of 4939 adults (≥40 years). Procedures: The proportion of individuals who underestimated (self-reported no balance problem but failed RTSBFCSS) or overestimated (self-reported having a balance problem but passed RTSBFCSS) their balance problem was calculated. Predictors of congruency among balance measures were explored using multivariable regression.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe study included 4,939 adults (mean-age 56.0 years (0.3 SE), 51.2% females). Of all participants, 36.9% had evidence of balance problems on RTSBFCSS. About 70% of those with performance-based balance deficits reported no balance problems on the self-reported question. About 35.8% (95%CI:33.7%-38.1%) were incongruent among balance measures. Specifically, 25.8% (95%CI:23.9%-27.8%) under-estimated their balance issues, and 10.1% (95%CI:8.8%-11.5%) over-estimated their balance problems. Males had 4% reduction in odds of congruency among balance measures with every one-year increase in age compared to 3% reduction in the same for females (aOR=0.96; 95%CI:0.95-0.96; p-value<0.001 males; aOR=0.97; 95%CI:0.96-0.98; p-value<0.001 females).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAbout 7 in 10 adults with performance-based balance deficits were unaware of their condition. Sole reliance on self-reported information for balance screening may be inadequate. Results can help identify populations more likely to have discrepancies between balance measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大多数基于人群的研究和临床跌倒风险筛查依赖于自我报告的平衡信息。本研究调查了自我报告的平衡信息与基于性能的平衡测量(Romberg Test of Standing balance on Firm and Compliant Support Surfaces, RTSBFCSS)之间的一致性。它还探讨了这些平衡措施之间一致性的预测因素。方法设计:对2001-2004年全国健康与营养调查周期(最新数据周期,含感兴趣变量)进行二次分析。参与者:4939名成年人(≥40岁)的全国代表性样本。方法:计算低估(自我报告无平衡问题但RTSBFCSS不及格)或高估(自我报告有平衡问题但通过RTSBFCSS)其平衡问题的比例。运用多变量回归方法探讨平衡测度间一致性的预测因素。结果纳入4939例成人,平均年龄56.0岁(0.3 SE),女性51.2%。在所有参与者中,36.9%的人在RTSBFCSS上有平衡问题的证据。在那些表现平衡能力不足的学生中,约有70%的人在自我报告的问题上没有平衡问题。约35.8% (95%CI:33.7% ~ 38.1%)的平衡措施不一致。具体来说,25.8% (95%CI:23.9%-27.8%)低估了他们的平衡问题,10.1% (95%CI:8.8%-11.5%)高估了他们的平衡问题。男性年龄每增加一岁,平衡测量的一致性几率降低4%,而女性则降低3% (aOR=0.96;95%置信区间:0.95—-0.96;假定值< 0.001男性;aOR = 0.97;95%置信区间:0.96—-0.98;雌性p值< 0.001)。结论:大约7 / 10的表现平衡缺陷的成年人没有意识到自己的状况。仅依靠自我报告的信息进行平衡筛选可能是不够的。结果可以帮助确定更有可能在平衡测量之间存在差异的人群。
Incongruence between Self-report and Performance-based Measure of Balance in Community-Dwelling Adults.
BACKGROUND
Most population-based studies and clinical fall-risk screenings depend on self-reported balance information. This study investigated the congruency between self-reported balance information and performance-based balance measure (Romberg Test of Standing Balance on Firm and Compliant Support Surfaces, RTSBFCSS). It also explored predictors of congruency between these balance measures.
METHODS
Design: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 2001-2004 (latest data cycles with variables of interest). Participants: Nationally representative sample of 4939 adults (≥40 years). Procedures: The proportion of individuals who underestimated (self-reported no balance problem but failed RTSBFCSS) or overestimated (self-reported having a balance problem but passed RTSBFCSS) their balance problem was calculated. Predictors of congruency among balance measures were explored using multivariable regression.
RESULTS
The study included 4,939 adults (mean-age 56.0 years (0.3 SE), 51.2% females). Of all participants, 36.9% had evidence of balance problems on RTSBFCSS. About 70% of those with performance-based balance deficits reported no balance problems on the self-reported question. About 35.8% (95%CI:33.7%-38.1%) were incongruent among balance measures. Specifically, 25.8% (95%CI:23.9%-27.8%) under-estimated their balance issues, and 10.1% (95%CI:8.8%-11.5%) over-estimated their balance problems. Males had 4% reduction in odds of congruency among balance measures with every one-year increase in age compared to 3% reduction in the same for females (aOR=0.96; 95%CI:0.95-0.96; p-value<0.001 males; aOR=0.97; 95%CI:0.96-0.98; p-value<0.001 females).
CONCLUSIONS
About 7 in 10 adults with performance-based balance deficits were unaware of their condition. Sole reliance on self-reported information for balance screening may be inadequate. Results can help identify populations more likely to have discrepancies between balance measures.