克拉通下岩石圈地幔均匀性的证据

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Federico D. Munch, Paolo A. Sossi, Amir Khan
{"title":"克拉通下岩石圈地幔均匀性的证据","authors":"Federico D. Munch,&nbsp;Paolo A. Sossi,&nbsp;Amir Khan","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cratons are characterized by thick mantle roots that have experienced high degrees of partial melting, resulting in a cold, strong, and buoyant mantle compared to its oceanic counterpart. The extent of chemical variability within cratonic roots, the role of cratons in insulating the mantle over time and subsequent triggering of continental break-up, however, remains debated. To better understand the lithospheric and asthenospheric compositional variability of cratons, we combine phase equilibrium computations with the inversion of P-to-s and S-to-p receiver function waveforms and fundamental-mode Rayleigh wave dispersion data recorded at 53 globally distributed seismic stations in different tectonic settings with a focus on cratonic regions. Because existing binary basalt-harzburgite models are unable to account for the variability in Mg# (MgO/[MgO + FeO]) and Mg/Si ratios recorded in xenoliths from cratonic regions, we propose an extension of the binary model that is based on nominally pyroxenite, lherzolite and dunite. The retrieved mantle lithospheric compositions have elevated Mg# (∼90–93) compared to asthenospheric mantle (Mg# ∼89), consistent with their having undergone differing degrees of melt extraction at mean pressures of 3–4 GPa. There are no indications for systematic differences in mantle composition or thermal structure with craton age or location. Instead, we find that the potential temperature of the asthenosphere beneath cratons is roughly 50°C cooler than the surrounding ambient mantle. This suggests that the insulating (i.e., heating) effect of continents may not be as prominent as implied by dynamical studies simulating the exchange of heat and material across the mantle.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029649","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for Lithospheric Mantle Uniformity Beneath Cratons\",\"authors\":\"Federico D. Munch,&nbsp;Paolo A. Sossi,&nbsp;Amir Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cratons are characterized by thick mantle roots that have experienced high degrees of partial melting, resulting in a cold, strong, and buoyant mantle compared to its oceanic counterpart. The extent of chemical variability within cratonic roots, the role of cratons in insulating the mantle over time and subsequent triggering of continental break-up, however, remains debated. To better understand the lithospheric and asthenospheric compositional variability of cratons, we combine phase equilibrium computations with the inversion of P-to-s and S-to-p receiver function waveforms and fundamental-mode Rayleigh wave dispersion data recorded at 53 globally distributed seismic stations in different tectonic settings with a focus on cratonic regions. Because existing binary basalt-harzburgite models are unable to account for the variability in Mg# (MgO/[MgO + FeO]) and Mg/Si ratios recorded in xenoliths from cratonic regions, we propose an extension of the binary model that is based on nominally pyroxenite, lherzolite and dunite. The retrieved mantle lithospheric compositions have elevated Mg# (∼90–93) compared to asthenospheric mantle (Mg# ∼89), consistent with their having undergone differing degrees of melt extraction at mean pressures of 3–4 GPa. There are no indications for systematic differences in mantle composition or thermal structure with craton age or location. Instead, we find that the potential temperature of the asthenosphere beneath cratons is roughly 50°C cooler than the surrounding ambient mantle. This suggests that the insulating (i.e., heating) effect of continents may not be as prominent as implied by dynamical studies simulating the exchange of heat and material across the mantle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029649\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地壳的特点是地幔根部较厚,经历了高度的部分融化,与海洋地幔相比,地幔寒冷、坚固、浮力大。然而,关于板块根内部的化学变异程度、板块在长期隔绝地幔方面的作用以及随后引发大陆断裂的原因,仍然存在争议。为了更好地了解板块岩石圈和星体层成分的变异性,我们将相平衡计算与反演 P-to-s 和 S-to-p 接收函数波形和基模雷利波频散数据相结合,这些数据记录在不同构造背景下的 53 个全球分布的地震台站中,重点是板块区域。由于现有的二元玄武岩-黑云母模型无法解释来自板块构造地区的岩石中记录到的镁#(MgO/[MgO + FeO])和镁/硅比率的变化,我们提出了一个基于名义上的辉绿岩、黑云母和云英岩的二元模型的扩展。与星体层地幔(Mg# ∼89)相比,岩石圈地幔成分的 Mg#(∼90-93)较高,这与它们在 3-4 GPa 的平均压力下经历了不同程度的熔融萃取是一致的。没有迹象表明地幔成分或热结构随克拉通年龄或位置的变化而存在系统性差异。相反,我们发现克拉通下面的岩浆层的潜在温度比周围环境地幔的温度低大约 50°C。这表明,大陆的隔热(即加热)效应可能并不像模拟地幔热量和物质交换的动力学研究暗示的那样突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evidence for Lithospheric Mantle Uniformity Beneath Cratons

Evidence for Lithospheric Mantle Uniformity Beneath Cratons

Cratons are characterized by thick mantle roots that have experienced high degrees of partial melting, resulting in a cold, strong, and buoyant mantle compared to its oceanic counterpart. The extent of chemical variability within cratonic roots, the role of cratons in insulating the mantle over time and subsequent triggering of continental break-up, however, remains debated. To better understand the lithospheric and asthenospheric compositional variability of cratons, we combine phase equilibrium computations with the inversion of P-to-s and S-to-p receiver function waveforms and fundamental-mode Rayleigh wave dispersion data recorded at 53 globally distributed seismic stations in different tectonic settings with a focus on cratonic regions. Because existing binary basalt-harzburgite models are unable to account for the variability in Mg# (MgO/[MgO + FeO]) and Mg/Si ratios recorded in xenoliths from cratonic regions, we propose an extension of the binary model that is based on nominally pyroxenite, lherzolite and dunite. The retrieved mantle lithospheric compositions have elevated Mg# (∼90–93) compared to asthenospheric mantle (Mg# ∼89), consistent with their having undergone differing degrees of melt extraction at mean pressures of 3–4 GPa. There are no indications for systematic differences in mantle composition or thermal structure with craton age or location. Instead, we find that the potential temperature of the asthenosphere beneath cratons is roughly 50°C cooler than the surrounding ambient mantle. This suggests that the insulating (i.e., heating) effect of continents may not be as prominent as implied by dynamical studies simulating the exchange of heat and material across the mantle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信