一份研究报告指出,公众支持普遍的二次审查判决

IF 4.6 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Paula Smith, Amanda Graham, Francis T. Cullen, Justin T. Pickett, Cheryl Lero Jonson, Kellie R. Hannan, Amanda Pompoco
{"title":"一份研究报告指出,公众支持普遍的二次审查判决","authors":"Paula Smith,&nbsp;Amanda Graham,&nbsp;Francis T. Cullen,&nbsp;Justin T. Pickett,&nbsp;Cheryl Lero Jonson,&nbsp;Kellie R. Hannan,&nbsp;Amanda Pompoco","doi":"10.1111/1745-9125.12391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on a 2023 national YouGov survey (<i>N</i> = 800), we explored public support for universal second look sentencing—the view that all incarcerated individuals, not just those who committed their crimes before they were age 25, should be eligible to have lengthy sentences revisited by judges after serving 15 to 20 years in prison. A majority of Americans supported a universal policy, with only 1 in 5 respondents opposed. Multivariate analyses showed that redeemability is not static but dynamic. It can be earned if incarcerated people signal their reformation by completing rehabilitation programs and receiving a positive recommendation from the warden. Support from the victim (or their family) also matters. Given the public's endorsement, second look sentencing may be a viable policy to address mass incarceration and the problem of extreme prison terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48385,"journal":{"name":"Criminology","volume":"63 1","pages":"280-293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-9125.12391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public support for universal second look sentencing, a research note\",\"authors\":\"Paula Smith,&nbsp;Amanda Graham,&nbsp;Francis T. Cullen,&nbsp;Justin T. Pickett,&nbsp;Cheryl Lero Jonson,&nbsp;Kellie R. Hannan,&nbsp;Amanda Pompoco\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1745-9125.12391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Based on a 2023 national YouGov survey (<i>N</i> = 800), we explored public support for universal second look sentencing—the view that all incarcerated individuals, not just those who committed their crimes before they were age 25, should be eligible to have lengthy sentences revisited by judges after serving 15 to 20 years in prison. A majority of Americans supported a universal policy, with only 1 in 5 respondents opposed. Multivariate analyses showed that redeemability is not static but dynamic. It can be earned if incarcerated people signal their reformation by completing rehabilitation programs and receiving a positive recommendation from the warden. Support from the victim (or their family) also matters. Given the public's endorsement, second look sentencing may be a viable policy to address mass incarceration and the problem of extreme prison terms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminology\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"280-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-9125.12391\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.12391\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.12391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据YouGov在2023年进行的一项全国调查(N = 800),我们调查了公众对普遍的二次判决的支持度——即所有被监禁的人,而不仅仅是那些在25岁之前犯罪的人,都应该有资格在服刑15至20年后被法官重审长期刑期。大多数美国人支持一项全民政策,只有五分之一的受访者反对。多变量分析表明,可赎回性不是静态的,而是动态的。如果被监禁的人通过完成改造计划并得到监狱长的积极推荐来表明他们的改造,就可以获得这种奖励。受害者(或其家人)的支持也很重要。鉴于公众的支持,事后判决可能是解决大规模监禁和极端刑期问题的可行政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public support for universal second look sentencing, a research note

Based on a 2023 national YouGov survey (N = 800), we explored public support for universal second look sentencing—the view that all incarcerated individuals, not just those who committed their crimes before they were age 25, should be eligible to have lengthy sentences revisited by judges after serving 15 to 20 years in prison. A majority of Americans supported a universal policy, with only 1 in 5 respondents opposed. Multivariate analyses showed that redeemability is not static but dynamic. It can be earned if incarcerated people signal their reformation by completing rehabilitation programs and receiving a positive recommendation from the warden. Support from the victim (or their family) also matters. Given the public's endorsement, second look sentencing may be a viable policy to address mass incarceration and the problem of extreme prison terms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology
Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Criminology is devoted to crime and deviant behavior. Disciplines covered in Criminology include: - sociology - psychology - design - systems analysis - decision theory Major emphasis is placed on empirical research and scientific methodology. Criminology"s content also includes articles which review the literature or deal with theoretical issues stated in the literature as well as suggestions for the types of investigation which might be carried out in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信