烧毁碳汇:欧盟的森林生物质政策如何削弱气候减缓效果

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
M. S. Booth, J. Giuntoli
{"title":"烧毁碳汇:欧盟的森林生物质政策如何削弱气候减缓效果","authors":"M. S. Booth,&nbsp;J. Giuntoli","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While burning wood for heat and electricity constitutes the largest source of renewable energy in the EU, forest biomass harvesting is weakening the EU's forest carbon sink, and some Member States have lost their net forest sink completely, including heavily forested countries like Estonia and Finland. A European Commission 2016 impact assessment for bioenergy under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive predicted the forest sink would shrink as biomass use increased, even if sustainability criteria were required. Nonetheless, the EU adopted criteria that consider “sustainable” forest biomass to have zero carbon emissions, rendering EU and UK treatment of biomass inconsistent with IPCC's Guidance for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Renewable energy incentives have increased biomass use for electricity generation 1100% since 1990, but residential heating, which is ungoverned by any criteria, still represents the largest use of wood for energy in the EU. Incentives for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which is intended to deliver “negative emissions,” will likely increase pressure on forests. Although IPCC Guidance is clear that BECCS fueled with forest biomass does not remove net CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere just because carbon has been stored belowground, EU and UK climate policies rely on large-scale deployment of BECCS to meet climate targets. Bioenergy use cuts across environmental, energy, and climate policy domains; thus, reversing the accelerating decline of the forest carbon sink will require significantly better integration of renewable energy policies with climate targets and ensuring that biomass policies are aligned with international emissions reporting. Policymakers can reduce pressure on forests by disqualifying forest biomass from counting toward renewable energy targets, reducing subsidies for wood-burning, and adopting forest management policies that prioritize carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Reducing biomass harvesting and reallocating the billions currently spent on bioenergy subsidies to solar, wind, and geothermal energy is essential for restoring forests and achieving climate targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burning Up the Carbon Sink: How the EU's Forest Biomass Policy Undermines Climate Mitigation\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Booth,&nbsp;J. Giuntoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While burning wood for heat and electricity constitutes the largest source of renewable energy in the EU, forest biomass harvesting is weakening the EU's forest carbon sink, and some Member States have lost their net forest sink completely, including heavily forested countries like Estonia and Finland. A European Commission 2016 impact assessment for bioenergy under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive predicted the forest sink would shrink as biomass use increased, even if sustainability criteria were required. Nonetheless, the EU adopted criteria that consider “sustainable” forest biomass to have zero carbon emissions, rendering EU and UK treatment of biomass inconsistent with IPCC's Guidance for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Renewable energy incentives have increased biomass use for electricity generation 1100% since 1990, but residential heating, which is ungoverned by any criteria, still represents the largest use of wood for energy in the EU. Incentives for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which is intended to deliver “negative emissions,” will likely increase pressure on forests. Although IPCC Guidance is clear that BECCS fueled with forest biomass does not remove net CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere just because carbon has been stored belowground, EU and UK climate policies rely on large-scale deployment of BECCS to meet climate targets. Bioenergy use cuts across environmental, energy, and climate policy domains; thus, reversing the accelerating decline of the forest carbon sink will require significantly better integration of renewable energy policies with climate targets and ensuring that biomass policies are aligned with international emissions reporting. Policymakers can reduce pressure on forests by disqualifying forest biomass from counting toward renewable energy targets, reducing subsidies for wood-burning, and adopting forest management policies that prioritize carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Reducing biomass harvesting and reallocating the billions currently spent on bioenergy subsidies to solar, wind, and geothermal energy is essential for restoring forests and achieving climate targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然燃烧木材供热和发电是欧盟最大的可再生能源来源,但森林生物质的采伐正在削弱欧盟的森林碳汇,一些成员国已经完全失去了森林净汇,包括爱沙尼亚和芬兰等森林茂密的国家。欧盟委员会 2016 年根据欧盟《可再生能源指令》对生物能源进行的影响评估预测,随着生物质使用量的增加,即使要求制定可持续性标准,森林碳汇也会减少。然而,欧盟采用的标准认为 "可持续 "森林生物质的碳排放量为零,这使得欧盟和英国对生物质的处理不符合 IPCC 的《国家温室气体清单指南》。自 1990 年以来,可再生能源激励措施已使生物质发电的使用量增加了 1100%,但不受任何标准约束的住宅供暖仍是欧盟最大的木材能源使用量。旨在实现 "负排放 "的碳捕集与封存(BECCS)生物能源激励措施可能会增加对森林的压力。尽管 IPCC 指南明确指出,以森林生物质为燃料的 BECCS 并不会因为碳已被储存在地下而从大气中清除净二氧化碳,但欧盟和英国的气候政策依赖大规模部署 BECCS 来实现气候目标。生物能源的使用涉及环境、能源和气候政策领域;因此,要扭转森林碳汇加速减少的趋势,就必须更好地将可再生能源政策与气候目标相结合,并确保生物质政策与国际排放报告相一致。政策制定者可以通过取消将森林生物质计入可再生能源目标的资格、减少对木材燃烧的补贴,以及采取优先考虑碳固存和生物多样性的森林管理政策来减少对森林的压力。减少生物质采伐,将目前用于生物能源补贴的数十亿资金重新分配给太阳能、风能和地热能,对于恢复森林和实现气候目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Burning Up the Carbon Sink: How the EU's Forest Biomass Policy Undermines Climate Mitigation

Burning Up the Carbon Sink: How the EU's Forest Biomass Policy Undermines Climate Mitigation

While burning wood for heat and electricity constitutes the largest source of renewable energy in the EU, forest biomass harvesting is weakening the EU's forest carbon sink, and some Member States have lost their net forest sink completely, including heavily forested countries like Estonia and Finland. A European Commission 2016 impact assessment for bioenergy under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive predicted the forest sink would shrink as biomass use increased, even if sustainability criteria were required. Nonetheless, the EU adopted criteria that consider “sustainable” forest biomass to have zero carbon emissions, rendering EU and UK treatment of biomass inconsistent with IPCC's Guidance for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Renewable energy incentives have increased biomass use for electricity generation 1100% since 1990, but residential heating, which is ungoverned by any criteria, still represents the largest use of wood for energy in the EU. Incentives for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which is intended to deliver “negative emissions,” will likely increase pressure on forests. Although IPCC Guidance is clear that BECCS fueled with forest biomass does not remove net CO2 from the atmosphere just because carbon has been stored belowground, EU and UK climate policies rely on large-scale deployment of BECCS to meet climate targets. Bioenergy use cuts across environmental, energy, and climate policy domains; thus, reversing the accelerating decline of the forest carbon sink will require significantly better integration of renewable energy policies with climate targets and ensuring that biomass policies are aligned with international emissions reporting. Policymakers can reduce pressure on forests by disqualifying forest biomass from counting toward renewable energy targets, reducing subsidies for wood-burning, and adopting forest management policies that prioritize carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Reducing biomass harvesting and reallocating the billions currently spent on bioenergy subsidies to solar, wind, and geothermal energy is essential for restoring forests and achieving climate targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信