消费者领域的恐惧管理理论:对死亡率显著性驱动的消费者反应的系统回顾和元分析

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jolien L. Arendsen, Britta C. Brugman, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, Marieke L. Fransen
{"title":"消费者领域的恐惧管理理论:对死亡率显著性驱动的消费者反应的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Jolien L. Arendsen,&nbsp;Britta C. Brugman,&nbsp;Guido M. van Koningsbruggen,&nbsp;Marieke L. Fransen","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine terror management theory (TMT) in the consumer behavior domain. TMT postulates that existential anxiety (i.e., mortality salience) drives people to invest in anxiety buffers, affecting many different behaviors, including consumer responses. Due to the broad nature of these responses, we distinguished three categories: “I want more” (e.g., more money, brands, and products), “protect my culture” (e.g., preferring domestic and old products to foreign and new ones), and “pro-social” responses (e.g., donating or sharing money). One hundred and twelve experiments were included in the systematic review, which revealed a large variety in the studied dependent variables, randomly studied moderating variables, and inconsistent outcomes. Seventy studies (with 125 effect sizes) were included in the meta-analysis, which yielded a small but positive overall effect size (<i>g</i> = 0.21) of mortality salience on consumer responses, with similar results across the three categories (<i>g</i> between 0.13 and 0.30). While research in the TMT consumer domain is very dispersed, the analyses provide some support for the mortality salience hypothesis. We recommend researchers to further explore why certain consumer responses are evoked by mortality salience and make use of preregistered and high-powered experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcs.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses\",\"authors\":\"Jolien L. Arendsen,&nbsp;Britta C. Brugman,&nbsp;Guido M. van Koningsbruggen,&nbsp;Marieke L. Fransen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine terror management theory (TMT) in the consumer behavior domain. TMT postulates that existential anxiety (i.e., mortality salience) drives people to invest in anxiety buffers, affecting many different behaviors, including consumer responses. Due to the broad nature of these responses, we distinguished three categories: “I want more” (e.g., more money, brands, and products), “protect my culture” (e.g., preferring domestic and old products to foreign and new ones), and “pro-social” responses (e.g., donating or sharing money). One hundred and twelve experiments were included in the systematic review, which revealed a large variety in the studied dependent variables, randomly studied moderating variables, and inconsistent outcomes. Seventy studies (with 125 effect sizes) were included in the meta-analysis, which yielded a small but positive overall effect size (<i>g</i> = 0.21) of mortality salience on consumer responses, with similar results across the three categories (<i>g</i> between 0.13 and 0.30). While research in the TMT consumer domain is very dispersed, the analyses provide some support for the mortality salience hypothesis. We recommend researchers to further explore why certain consumer responses are evoked by mortality salience and make use of preregistered and high-powered experiments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcs.70056\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用系统回顾和元分析的方法,对消费者行为领域的恐惧管理理论进行了研究。TMT假设存在焦虑(即死亡率显著性)驱使人们投资于焦虑缓冲,影响许多不同的行为,包括消费者的反应。由于这些反应的广泛性质,我们区分了三类:“我想要更多”(例如,更多的钱,品牌和产品),“保护我的文化”(例如,更喜欢国内和老产品而不是外国和新产品),以及“亲社会”反应(例如,捐赠或分享钱)。系统评价纳入了112个实验,结果显示研究的因变量、随机研究的调节变量种类繁多,结果不一致。荟萃分析包括70项研究(125个效应值),得出了死亡率显著性对消费者反应的小但积极的总体效应值(g = 0.21),三个类别的结果相似(g在0.13和0.30之间)。虽然在TMT消费者领域的研究非常分散,但这些分析为死亡率显著性假设提供了一些支持。我们建议研究人员进一步探索为什么某些消费者的反应是由死亡率显著性引起的,并利用预注册和高功率实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses

Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine terror management theory (TMT) in the consumer behavior domain. TMT postulates that existential anxiety (i.e., mortality salience) drives people to invest in anxiety buffers, affecting many different behaviors, including consumer responses. Due to the broad nature of these responses, we distinguished three categories: “I want more” (e.g., more money, brands, and products), “protect my culture” (e.g., preferring domestic and old products to foreign and new ones), and “pro-social” responses (e.g., donating or sharing money). One hundred and twelve experiments were included in the systematic review, which revealed a large variety in the studied dependent variables, randomly studied moderating variables, and inconsistent outcomes. Seventy studies (with 125 effect sizes) were included in the meta-analysis, which yielded a small but positive overall effect size (g = 0.21) of mortality salience on consumer responses, with similar results across the three categories (g between 0.13 and 0.30). While research in the TMT consumer domain is very dispersed, the analyses provide some support for the mortality salience hypothesis. We recommend researchers to further explore why certain consumer responses are evoked by mortality salience and make use of preregistered and high-powered experiments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信