反思皮肤科试验及其他试验中人群描述符的使用:将种族和人种与肤色区分开来

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Valerie M. Harvey, Jenna C. Lester, Tarannum Jaleel, Junko Takeshita, Amy J. McMichael, Yvette Miller-Monthrope, Nina G. Jablonski, Jade Lewis, Andrew F. Alexis, Stafford G. Brown, Cheryl M. Burgess, Angel S. Byrd, Suephy C. Chen, Caryn Cobb, Roxana Daneshjou, Seemal R. Desai, Candrice R. Heath, Chidubem A.V. Okeke, Hema Sundaram, Susan C. Taylor, Jonathan S. Weiss, Jane Y. Yoo, Valerie D. Callender
{"title":"反思皮肤科试验及其他试验中人群描述符的使用:将种族和人种与肤色区分开来","authors":"Valerie M. Harvey,&nbsp;Jenna C. Lester,&nbsp;Tarannum Jaleel,&nbsp;Junko Takeshita,&nbsp;Amy J. McMichael,&nbsp;Yvette Miller-Monthrope,&nbsp;Nina G. Jablonski,&nbsp;Jade Lewis,&nbsp;Andrew F. Alexis,&nbsp;Stafford G. Brown,&nbsp;Cheryl M. Burgess,&nbsp;Angel S. Byrd,&nbsp;Suephy C. Chen,&nbsp;Caryn Cobb,&nbsp;Roxana Daneshjou,&nbsp;Seemal R. Desai,&nbsp;Candrice R. Heath,&nbsp;Chidubem A.V. Okeke,&nbsp;Hema Sundaram,&nbsp;Susan C. Taylor,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Weiss,&nbsp;Jane Y. Yoo,&nbsp;Valerie D. Callender","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04219-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><b>Importance</b>: Race and ethnicity as population descriptors in research and clinical practice have often been a subject of debate, drawing heightened scrutiny in recent years. Criticism focuses on their oversimplification and misapplication, which fail to capture the complexity of human health and genetic diversity. There is growing recognition that these categories, rooted in outdated social constructs, do not accurately reflect biological differences. <b>Observations</b>: Historically, race and ethnicity have been used as proxies for genetic variation and skin color, despite the understanding that these constructs are not biologically defined. The Skin of Color Society’s second <i>Meeting the Challenge</i> Summit, attended by over 100 U.S. and international participants, highlighted several key themes: (1) the need for transparency in the rationale behind using population descriptors and decision-making processes; (2) recognizing the role of race and racism in dermatology; (3) exploring the intersection of dermatology, skin color, and cultural influences; (4) understanding the context of population descriptor usage; (5) developing improved, objective tools for classifying skin color; and (6) advancing research and creating guidelines. <b>Conclusions and Relevance</b>: There is an urgent need to reconsider the use of race and ethnicity as population descriptors in dermatology research. Current systems, which conflate social identity with biological markers, perpetuate health disparities and limit the accuracy of clinical data. Moving forward, more specific descriptors such as skin color, alongside socially determined factors, will be crucial in achieving meaningful diversity and inclusivity in clinical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the use of population descriptors in dermatology trials and beyond: disentangling race and ethnicity from skin color\",\"authors\":\"Valerie M. Harvey,&nbsp;Jenna C. Lester,&nbsp;Tarannum Jaleel,&nbsp;Junko Takeshita,&nbsp;Amy J. McMichael,&nbsp;Yvette Miller-Monthrope,&nbsp;Nina G. Jablonski,&nbsp;Jade Lewis,&nbsp;Andrew F. Alexis,&nbsp;Stafford G. Brown,&nbsp;Cheryl M. Burgess,&nbsp;Angel S. Byrd,&nbsp;Suephy C. Chen,&nbsp;Caryn Cobb,&nbsp;Roxana Daneshjou,&nbsp;Seemal R. Desai,&nbsp;Candrice R. Heath,&nbsp;Chidubem A.V. Okeke,&nbsp;Hema Sundaram,&nbsp;Susan C. Taylor,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Weiss,&nbsp;Jane Y. Yoo,&nbsp;Valerie D. Callender\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04219-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><b>Importance</b>: Race and ethnicity as population descriptors in research and clinical practice have often been a subject of debate, drawing heightened scrutiny in recent years. Criticism focuses on their oversimplification and misapplication, which fail to capture the complexity of human health and genetic diversity. There is growing recognition that these categories, rooted in outdated social constructs, do not accurately reflect biological differences. <b>Observations</b>: Historically, race and ethnicity have been used as proxies for genetic variation and skin color, despite the understanding that these constructs are not biologically defined. The Skin of Color Society’s second <i>Meeting the Challenge</i> Summit, attended by over 100 U.S. and international participants, highlighted several key themes: (1) the need for transparency in the rationale behind using population descriptors and decision-making processes; (2) recognizing the role of race and racism in dermatology; (3) exploring the intersection of dermatology, skin color, and cultural influences; (4) understanding the context of population descriptor usage; (5) developing improved, objective tools for classifying skin color; and (6) advancing research and creating guidelines. <b>Conclusions and Relevance</b>: There is an urgent need to reconsider the use of race and ethnicity as population descriptors in dermatology research. Current systems, which conflate social identity with biological markers, perpetuate health disparities and limit the accuracy of clinical data. Moving forward, more specific descriptors such as skin color, alongside socially determined factors, will be crucial in achieving meaningful diversity and inclusivity in clinical research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04219-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04219-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:种族和民族在研究和临床实践中作为人口描述符经常是一个有争议的话题,近年来引起了更严格的审查。批评的焦点是它们过于简单化和误用,未能捕捉到人类健康和遗传多样性的复杂性。越来越多的人认识到,这些根植于过时的社会结构的分类并不能准确地反映生物学上的差异。观察:历史上,种族和民族被用作遗传变异和肤色的代表,尽管人们理解这些结构不是生物学上定义的。有色人种协会的第二次会议挑战峰会,有100多名美国和国际参与者参加,强调了几个关键主题:(1)使用人口描述符和决策过程背后的基本原理需要透明度;(2)认识到种族和种族主义在皮肤病学中的作用;(3)探索皮肤病学、肤色和文化影响的交集;(4)理解种群描述符使用的语境;(5)开发改进的、客观的肤色分类工具;(6)推进研究和制定指导方针。结论和相关性:在皮肤病学研究中,迫切需要重新考虑种族和民族作为人群描述符的使用。目前的系统将社会身份与生物标记混为一谈,使健康差距永续存在,并限制了临床数据的准确性。展望未来,更具体的描述符,如肤色,以及社会决定因素,对于实现临床研究中有意义的多样性和包容性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking the use of population descriptors in dermatology trials and beyond: disentangling race and ethnicity from skin color

Importance: Race and ethnicity as population descriptors in research and clinical practice have often been a subject of debate, drawing heightened scrutiny in recent years. Criticism focuses on their oversimplification and misapplication, which fail to capture the complexity of human health and genetic diversity. There is growing recognition that these categories, rooted in outdated social constructs, do not accurately reflect biological differences. Observations: Historically, race and ethnicity have been used as proxies for genetic variation and skin color, despite the understanding that these constructs are not biologically defined. The Skin of Color Society’s second Meeting the Challenge Summit, attended by over 100 U.S. and international participants, highlighted several key themes: (1) the need for transparency in the rationale behind using population descriptors and decision-making processes; (2) recognizing the role of race and racism in dermatology; (3) exploring the intersection of dermatology, skin color, and cultural influences; (4) understanding the context of population descriptor usage; (5) developing improved, objective tools for classifying skin color; and (6) advancing research and creating guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: There is an urgent need to reconsider the use of race and ethnicity as population descriptors in dermatology research. Current systems, which conflate social identity with biological markers, perpetuate health disparities and limit the accuracy of clinical data. Moving forward, more specific descriptors such as skin color, alongside socially determined factors, will be crucial in achieving meaningful diversity and inclusivity in clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信