制定和评估患者参与问卷(PEQ)

Stephanie Batio, Laura M. Curtis, Julia Yoshino Benavente, Stacy C. Bailey, Michael S. Wolf
{"title":"制定和评估患者参与问卷(PEQ)","authors":"Stephanie Batio,&nbsp;Laura M. Curtis,&nbsp;Julia Yoshino Benavente,&nbsp;Stacy C. Bailey,&nbsp;Michael S. Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to develop and evaluate the Patient Engagement Questionnaire (PEQ); a brief, remote assessment that captures both measures of health literacy and patient activation in the context of engagement in healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants in the COVID-19 &amp; Chronic Conditions cohort study completed a survey that included PEQ items, demographics, Newest Vital Sign, Consumer Health Activation Index, and patient-reported outcomes. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to conduct an item reduction process and assess fit. Spearman correlations and generalized linear regression models were performed to assess convergent and predictive validity. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios were used to determine cutoffs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>630 participants completed the survey. PEQ had 6 items loading onto one single factor, with good reliability (α = 0.76), and convergent validity with the NVS (<em>r</em> = 0.30, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and CHAI (<em>r</em> = 0.41, p &lt; 0.001). Higher PEQ scores were significantly associated with lower depression (<em>r</em> = −0.30, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and better physical function (<em>r</em> = 0.31, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Two categories emerged: limited (6–26, SSLR: 3.15) and adequate (26–30, SSLR: 0.53).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PEQ is a brief and easily administered tool designed to capture the intersect between health literacy and activation.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>The PEQ will help identify patients struggling with care engagement, aiding resource allocation to those most in need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and evaluation of the patient engagement questionnaire (PEQ)\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Batio,&nbsp;Laura M. Curtis,&nbsp;Julia Yoshino Benavente,&nbsp;Stacy C. Bailey,&nbsp;Michael S. Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to develop and evaluate the Patient Engagement Questionnaire (PEQ); a brief, remote assessment that captures both measures of health literacy and patient activation in the context of engagement in healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants in the COVID-19 &amp; Chronic Conditions cohort study completed a survey that included PEQ items, demographics, Newest Vital Sign, Consumer Health Activation Index, and patient-reported outcomes. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to conduct an item reduction process and assess fit. Spearman correlations and generalized linear regression models were performed to assess convergent and predictive validity. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios were used to determine cutoffs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>630 participants completed the survey. PEQ had 6 items loading onto one single factor, with good reliability (α = 0.76), and convergent validity with the NVS (<em>r</em> = 0.30, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and CHAI (<em>r</em> = 0.41, p &lt; 0.001). Higher PEQ scores were significantly associated with lower depression (<em>r</em> = −0.30, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and better physical function (<em>r</em> = 0.31, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Two categories emerged: limited (6–26, SSLR: 3.15) and adequate (26–30, SSLR: 0.53).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PEQ is a brief and easily administered tool designed to capture the intersect between health literacy and activation.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>The PEQ will help identify patients struggling with care engagement, aiding resource allocation to those most in need.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 COVID-19 & 慢性病队列研究的参与者完成了一项调查,其中包括 PEQ 项目、人口统计学、最新生命体征、消费者健康激活指数和患者报告结果。采用探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析对项目进行缩减并评估拟合度。斯皮尔曼相关性和广义线性回归模型用于评估收敛性和预测有效性。结果 630 名参与者完成了调查。PEQ 有 6 个项目,负载在一个因子上,具有良好的可靠性 (α = 0.76),与 NVS (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) 和 CHAI (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) 具有会聚有效性。PEQ 分数越高,抑郁程度越低(r = -0.30,p < 0.001),身体功能越好(r = 0.31,p < 0.01)。结论PEQ是一种简短且易于管理的工具,旨在捕捉健康素养与激活之间的交叉点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and evaluation of the patient engagement questionnaire (PEQ)

Objective

We sought to develop and evaluate the Patient Engagement Questionnaire (PEQ); a brief, remote assessment that captures both measures of health literacy and patient activation in the context of engagement in healthcare.

Methods

Participants in the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions cohort study completed a survey that included PEQ items, demographics, Newest Vital Sign, Consumer Health Activation Index, and patient-reported outcomes. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to conduct an item reduction process and assess fit. Spearman correlations and generalized linear regression models were performed to assess convergent and predictive validity. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios were used to determine cutoffs.

Results

630 participants completed the survey. PEQ had 6 items loading onto one single factor, with good reliability (α = 0.76), and convergent validity with the NVS (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) and CHAI (r = 0.41, p < 0.001). Higher PEQ scores were significantly associated with lower depression (r = −0.30, p < 0.001) and better physical function (r = 0.31, p < 0.01). Two categories emerged: limited (6–26, SSLR: 3.15) and adequate (26–30, SSLR: 0.53).

Conclusion

The PEQ is a brief and easily administered tool designed to capture the intersect between health literacy and activation.

Practice implications

The PEQ will help identify patients struggling with care engagement, aiding resource allocation to those most in need.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信